孫繼峰 徐立功 譚金霞 楊曉東 宋銀行 周峰 韓太利



摘要了解我國蘿卜研究現狀,為相關科研工作者和管理決策者提供參考。基于文獻計量學分析方法,以《中國期刊全文數據庫》為數據來源,對1986—2016年我國有關蘿卜研究文獻的年份分布、研究領域、核心期刊、文獻主要產出單位、文章重要性、核心作者群分布、發表期刊等情況進行統計分析。結果表明,2016年蘿卜有效文獻量878篇,期刊263種;研究領域主要為蘿卜栽培、育種、生物技術等方面;確立了汪隆植等一批核心作者。近年來,有關蘿卜的文獻數量增加,但質量提升尚未跟上;有關大分子和組學等方面研究文獻相對較少;未來蘿卜研究的方向和重點應適當偏基礎性研究。
關鍵詞蘿卜;期刊;計量分析
中圖分類號S-058文獻標識碼
A文章編號0517-6611(2017)10-0206-04
Quantitative Analysis of Chinese Article of Raphanus sativus L. Based on CNKI
SUN Jifeng, XU Ligong, TAN Jinxia, HAN Taili* et al (Weifang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Weifang, Shandong 261071)
AbstractIn order to provide data support for horticulture researchers and administrative decision makers, the current status of Raphanus sativus was surveyed.Based on the analysis methods of document metrology,China Journal Fulltext Database of Chinese Academic Periodicals was viewed as the data sources,moreover,the year distribution,research field,main publishing units of literatures and the distribution situation of coreauthors groups of radish literatures published in China during 1986-2016 were analyzed statistically.The results showed that the research of Raphanus sativus obtained tremendous progress,there were more than 878 papers and 263 periodicals in 2016;The main research fields were breeding, cultivating and biotechnology, parts of core authors were determined,such as Wang Longzhi, etc.The number of Chinese horticultural papers published in journals has been increased in the past years, but the quality has not kept up with the quantity.The proportion of Raphanus sativus paper was smaller in the areas in basic research direction. In the future, more attentions should be paid to the problem of molecular and mics.
Key wordsRaphanus sativus;Journals;Quantitative analysis
蘿卜在我國栽培歷史悠久,是我國的第二大蔬菜作物[1]。隨著農業結構調整與外向型農業的發展,我國蘿卜生產面臨新的發展機遇,我國在世界蘿卜產業中的地位越來越重要,已成為世界第一蘿卜生產國[2]。近年來全國播種面積在120萬hm2左右[3]。
近年來,關于蘿卜的研究不斷增多,相應的以蘿卜為主題的文獻也在逐年增加,開展以蘿卜為題目的文獻計量分析,可以從側面深入了解蘿卜研究的發展概況。文獻計量學是對文獻進行定量研究的科學[4]。論文是科學研究成果的表現形式之一,論文數量和質量是科研產出能力以及科研活動活躍程度的重要標志之一[5]。利用文獻計量學的方法對某一研究領域的科研論文進行定量分析,是目前科研量化評價的重要方法之一,也越來越受到科學界的重視[6]?!?br>