









【摘要】為探究腿型碰撞器標(biāo)定試驗(yàn)的工作原理,詳細(xì)對比了先進(jìn)行人腿型碰撞器(aPLI)與柔性腿型碰撞器(FlexPLI)在結(jié)構(gòu)上的差異,總結(jié)了腿型碰撞器動態(tài)標(biāo)定和靜態(tài)標(biāo)定限值確定的方法分別為混合組群均值估計法和三點(diǎn)彎曲撓度試驗(yàn)法,歸納并比較了2種腿型碰撞器在動、靜態(tài)標(biāo)定限值上存在的顯著差異,在此基礎(chǔ)上剖析了這些差異的內(nèi)在原因,動態(tài)標(biāo)定限值差異的主要原因是aPLI增加了模擬人體上肢的質(zhì)量模塊,靜態(tài)標(biāo)定限值差異的主要原因是aPLI腿部和膝部結(jié)構(gòu)改變。
主題詞:先進(jìn)行人腿型碰撞器 柔性腿型碰撞器 動態(tài)標(biāo)定限值 靜態(tài)標(biāo)定限值
中圖分類號:U467.1+4" "文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼:A" "DOI: 10.19620/j.cnki.1000-3703.20230551
Research on Calibration Limit of aPLI in Comparison with FlexPLI
for Pedestrian Protection
Yang Rui1, Sun Limei2, Zeng Xiangyi1, Liu Wei1
(1. CATARC Automotive Test Center (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300; 2. Tianjin Tianzhuo Robot Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300)
【Abstract】In order to explore the working principle of legform impactor calibration test, this paper compared in detail the structural differences between advanced Pedestrian Legform Impactor (aPLI) and Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (FlexPLI), summarized the methods for determining of dynamic calibration limits and static calibration limits of legform impactor as the mixed group mean estimation method and the three-point bending deflection test method respectively. The paper also summarized and compared the significant differences between dynamic calibration limits and static calibration limits of the two types of legform impactor, and analyzed the immanent cause for these differences. The main cause for the difference in dynamic calibration limits was the addition of mass module to simulate human upper limbs in aPLI, while the main cause for the difference in static calibration limit was the structural changes in the leg structure and knee structure of aPLI.
Key words: aPLI, FlexPLI, Dynamic calibration limit, Static calibration limit
1 前言
車輛的行人保護(hù)技術(shù)已發(fā)展多年,用于評價行人腿部傷害的腿型碰撞器的力學(xué)性能逐漸趨近人體的生物力學(xué)性能[1]。目前,此類碰撞器主要包括柔性腿型碰撞器(Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor,F(xiàn)lexPLI)和先進(jìn)行人腿型碰撞器(advanced Pedestrian Legform Impactor,aPLI)。二者分別為第二代和第三代腿型碰撞器,在結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計上存在較大差異。相比較而言,aPLI的生物逼真性更佳,對車輛行人保護(hù)安全性能的要求也更高,故在更加嚴(yán)格的中國新車評價規(guī)程(China-New Car Assessment Program,C-NCAP)中取代FlexPLI,而FlexPLI未來將主要用于面向車輛準(zhǔn)入的強(qiáng)制性檢驗(yàn)國家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
腿型碰撞器是結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜、工藝精細(xì)、精確度高的高速碰撞類設(shè)備,需要定期進(jìn)行標(biāo)定測試,以保證其性能滿足車輛試驗(yàn)所需的精度要求。aPLI在結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計、材料工藝及內(nèi)部電路等方面與FlexPLI相比均存在較大提升,同時也相應(yīng)提高了日常維護(hù)的難度,對其標(biāo)定測試的要求也更高。……