



摘要 目的:研究持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療對(duì)阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣綜合征(OSAHS)患者的臨床價(jià)值。方法:選取2019年8月至2022年8月泉州市第一醫(yī)院呼吸與危重癥醫(yī)學(xué)科收治的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征患者108例作為研究對(duì)象,按照隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為觀察組和對(duì)照組,每組54例。對(duì)照組給予常規(guī)保守性治療,觀察組給予持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療。采用蒙特利爾認(rèn)知評(píng)估量表(MOCA)評(píng)估2組患者的認(rèn)知情況,采用匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)(PSQI)表評(píng)估睡眠情況,對(duì)患者進(jìn)行多導(dǎo)睡眠監(jiān)測(cè)(PSG),并比較2組患者機(jī)體狀態(tài)及并發(fā)癥情況。結(jié)果:治療后,2組MOCA評(píng)分均有所上升,且觀察組MOCA評(píng)分顯著高于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(均Plt;0.05);治療后,觀察組PSQI評(píng)分顯著低于對(duì)照組,觀察組睡眠效率、夜間最低脈氧(LSaO2)指標(biāo)高于對(duì)照組,睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)、睡眠潛伏期、LSaO2低于90%的總時(shí)間/總睡眠檢測(cè)時(shí)間指標(biāo)均低于對(duì)照組,觀察組慢性咳嗽、性欲下降、抑郁癥、呼吸困難等不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。結(jié)論:采用持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療能有效改善OSAHS患者認(rèn)知功能及睡眠質(zhì)量,提高患者的睡眠效率,降低患者不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率,值得臨床推廣使用。
關(guān)鍵詞 持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療;阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征;睡眠質(zhì)量;認(rèn)知功能;并發(fā)癥
Clinical Value of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(CPAP) in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea SyndromeYOU Baoru,HUANG Songping,YE Xiaoyi
(Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Quanzhou First Hospital,Quanzhou 362000,China)
Abstract Objective:To study the clinical value of continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS).Methods:A total of 108 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome admitted to the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Quanzhou First Hospital from August 2019 to August 2022 were selected as research objects,and were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method,with 54 patients in each group.The control group was given conventional conservative treatment,and the observation group was given continuous positive airway pressure.Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MOCA) was used to assess the cognitive status of patients between 2 groups,and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI) scale was used to assess the sleep status.The patients were monitored by Polysomnography(PSG),and the body status and complications of the 2 groups were compared as well.Results:After treatment,the MOCA score of the 2 groups both increased,and the MOCA score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant(Pslt;0.05).After treatment,PSQI score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group,sleep efficiency and Lowest Oxygen Saturation(LSaO2) indexes of observation group were higher than those of the control group,Sleep apnea hypopnea index,sleep latency,total time of LSaO2 less than 90%/total sleep detection time were lower than the control group,and the incidence of chronic cough,decreased sexual desire,depression,dyspnea and other adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group,the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant(Pslt;0.05).Conclusion:Continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) therapy can effectively improve cognitive function and sleep quality,improve sleep efficiency and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with OSAHS,which is worthy of clinical promotion and use.
Keywords Continuous positive airway pressure therapy; Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; Sleep quality,Cognitive function; Complication
中圖分類(lèi)號(hào):R364.4;R338.63文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:Adoi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-7130.2023.06.072
目前,在高強(qiáng)度的工作壓力下,大多數(shù)的上班族都存在入睡困難、眠淺易醒等睡眠問(wèn)題,而睡眠呼吸類(lèi)疾病更會(huì)加重患者的睡眠障礙,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致機(jī)體出現(xiàn)各種系統(tǒng)性問(wèn)題[1]。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征(Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome,OSAHS)則是一種發(fā)病率達(dá)45%~74%的睡眠紊亂性疾病[2]。其病因不明,猜測(cè)可能與氣道組織病變或腦橋前段、腦干等呼吸中樞受損有關(guān)[3]。該病以夜間無(wú)規(guī)律性打鼾及鼾聲洪亮且伴呼吸暫停、記憶減退等作為特征性病理表現(xiàn),并隨著病情惡化會(huì)導(dǎo)致機(jī)體血壓、血糖、腦組織等多發(fā)性異常,甚至出現(xiàn)夜間猝死。近些年來(lái),OSAHS的治療方法隨著科技發(fā)展而進(jìn)步,臨床學(xué)者為解決患者睡眠低氧、睡眠質(zhì)量差、呼吸暫停等問(wèn)題,提出可對(duì)OSAHS患者進(jìn)行持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣(CPAP)治療,該治療系統(tǒng)最初應(yīng)用于處理新生兒純氧情況,旨在改善其換氣功能。而黃任祥等學(xué)者[4]對(duì)CPAP治療是否能改善成年OSAHS患者認(rèn)知功能、并發(fā)癥及睡眠情況提出了質(zhì)疑。本文選取我院收治的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征患者108例作為研究對(duì)象,分析持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療對(duì)阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣綜合征(OSAHS)患者的臨床價(jià)值,現(xiàn)將結(jié)果報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料 選取2019年8月至2022年8月泉州市第一醫(yī)院呼吸與危重癥醫(yī)學(xué)科收治的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征患者108例作為研究對(duì)象,按照隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為觀察組和對(duì)照組,每組54例。觀察組中男37例,女17例,年齡38-65歲,平均年齡(51.44±3.96)歲;體質(zhì)量指數(shù):22~29 kg/m2,平均體質(zhì)量指數(shù)(27.68±1.43)kg/m2;受教育年限:4~16年,平均受教育年限(10.77±3.41)年;呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)(24.04±5.48)次/h。對(duì)照組中男34例,女20例,年齡36~62歲,平均年齡(52.07±3.88)歲;體質(zhì)量指數(shù):21~29 kg/m2,平均體質(zhì)量指數(shù)(27.96±1.37)kg/m2;受教育年限:5~18年,平均受教育年限(10.81±3.32)年;呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)(27.11±5.29)次/h。一般資料經(jīng)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05),具有可比性。本研究經(jīng)過(guò)我院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)并經(jīng)患者及其家屬知情同意。
1.2 納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 1)所有患者均以入睡后出現(xiàn)呼吸暫停、記憶衰減、夜尿增多等癥狀入院就診并確診為阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征;2)已簽署同意書(shū)并積極配合本研究患者;3)呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)均超過(guò)5次/h;4)所有研究對(duì)象均成年。
1.3 排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 1)合并氣道嚴(yán)重類(lèi)疾病患者;2)合并其他呼吸系統(tǒng)疾病患者;3)近3個(gè)月有活血藥物治療史或抗感染藥物治療史。
1.4 干預(yù)方法
1.4.1 對(duì)照組給予常規(guī)保守性治療干預(yù) 由專(zhuān)業(yè)的康復(fù)治療師配合主治醫(yī)生為患者制定運(yùn)動(dòng)計(jì)劃,控制患者體質(zhì)量指數(shù),根據(jù)患者機(jī)體基礎(chǔ)性疾病針對(duì)性進(jìn)行降壓降脂等藥物治療,穩(wěn)定控制血壓血脂,避免進(jìn)一步惡化造成機(jī)體更大的損傷。
1.4.2 觀察組給予持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療 在對(duì)照組的基礎(chǔ)上采用全自動(dòng)持續(xù)正壓呼吸機(jī)(型號(hào):G3,天津怡和嘉業(yè)醫(yī)療科技有限公司,津械注準(zhǔn)20172540090)進(jìn)行治療,囑患者治療5~7 h/d,周末酌情進(jìn)行佩戴,持續(xù)治療60 d。
1.5 觀察指標(biāo) 1)采用蒙特利爾認(rèn)知評(píng)估量表(Montreal Cognitive Assessment,MOCA)[5]評(píng)估2組患者的認(rèn)知情況,對(duì)患者治療前后認(rèn)知功能情況進(jìn)行評(píng)估,該表由專(zhuān)業(yè)評(píng)估人員在評(píng)定室進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng),最高30分,分別檢測(cè)其定向力、記憶、思維等方面,分高則認(rèn)知功能損傷程度低;2)采用匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index,PSQI)[6]表評(píng)估睡眠情況,該表對(duì)睡眠障礙患者敏感度高,主要分為患者自評(píng)與評(píng)估人員測(cè)評(píng),按0~3級(jí)進(jìn)行等級(jí)計(jì)分?jǐn)?shù)算,對(duì)睡眠相關(guān)事件、藥物、效率等各方面進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)估,最終值與睡眠障礙程度呈負(fù)相關(guān);3)對(duì)患者進(jìn)行多導(dǎo)睡眠監(jiān)測(cè)(Polysomnography,PSG),受檢前1 d所有受檢人員停用刺激性較大的治療藥物,監(jiān)測(cè)當(dāng)晚采用便攜式睡眠呼吸監(jiān)測(cè)儀(型號(hào):PSM 100A,思瀾科技(成都)有限公司,川械注準(zhǔn)20162070145)檢測(cè)其睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)、睡眠潛伏期及其效率、夜間最低脈氧(Lowest Oxygen Saturation,LSaO2)及LSaO2低于90%的總時(shí)間/總睡眠檢測(cè)時(shí)間(Lowest Oxygen Saturation is Less Than 90%of Total Sleep Time,TS90%);4)比較2組患者機(jī)體狀態(tài)及并發(fā)癥情況,OSAHS患者常因其反復(fù)發(fā)作性導(dǎo)致機(jī)體常處于低氧狀態(tài),極易誘發(fā)慢性咳嗽、性欲下降、抑郁癥呼吸困難等并發(fā)癥。
1.6 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法 采用SPSS 22.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,計(jì)量數(shù)據(jù)以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(±s)表示,采用配對(duì)t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料用百分比(%)表示,采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以Plt;0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 2組患者M(jìn)OCA評(píng)分比較 治療后,2組MOCA評(píng)分均呈現(xiàn)直線上升趨勢(shì),且觀察組顯著高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
2.2 2組患者干預(yù)前后PSQI評(píng)分比較 治療后,觀察組PSQI評(píng)分顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。見(jiàn)表2。
2.3 2組患者干預(yù)前后PSG數(shù)據(jù)比較 治療后,觀察組睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)、睡眠潛伏期、TS90%指標(biāo)均低于對(duì)照組,其睡眠效率、LSaO2指標(biāo)高于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(均Plt;0.05)。見(jiàn)表3。
2.4 2組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率比較 護(hù)理干預(yù)后,觀察組慢性咳嗽、性欲下降、抑郁癥、呼吸困難等發(fā)生率顯著低于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(均Plt;0.05)。見(jiàn)表4。
3 討論
面對(duì)OSAHS患者的上漲趨勢(shì),臨床醫(yī)療人員將藥物治療、手術(shù)治療、通氣治療等多種手段全面應(yīng)用于診治OSAHS患者[7]。目前CPAP治療已經(jīng)逐漸發(fā)展成為OSAHS患者的首要治療手段,有效緩解患者病情發(fā)展,改善機(jī)體狀態(tài)。
CPAP對(duì)改善患者的機(jī)體含氧情況有一定療效,本文研究結(jié)果也顯示經(jīng)治療后觀察組睡眠效率、LSaO2指標(biāo)高于對(duì)照組,其睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)、睡眠潛伏期、TS90%指標(biāo)均低于對(duì)照組。說(shuō)明CPAP治療能顯著改善患者PSG指數(shù)。而PSG指數(shù)是目前我國(guó)診斷OSAHS患者的參考性指標(biāo),其中睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)是臨床常用于判斷患者呼吸暫停嚴(yán)重程度的重要指標(biāo),對(duì)于檢測(cè)OSAHS病情有指導(dǎo)意義[8]。同時(shí),結(jié)果也表明治療后觀察組認(rèn)知評(píng)估值高于對(duì)照組;治療后,2組睡眠質(zhì)量評(píng)分明顯降低,其中觀察組PSQI評(píng)分最低。顯示出CPAP治療對(duì)改善患者的睡眠質(zhì)量有顯著效果,進(jìn)一步肯定了CPAP對(duì)OSAHS患者的治療意義。
綜上所述,采用CPAP治療能改善OSAHS患者認(rèn)知功能及睡眠質(zhì)量,對(duì)其預(yù)后有積極作用。
利益沖突聲明:無(wú)。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]王楠,單麗娜.Rho激酶在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征象關(guān)肺動(dòng)脈高壓患者中的作用研究[J].臨床內(nèi)科雜志,2022,39(2):123-124.
[2]張麗霞.持續(xù)性正壓通氣治療對(duì)阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣綜合征患者視網(wǎng)膜神經(jīng)纖[J].現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療,2020(S01):149-150.
[3]谷亮,吳波.持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣治療依從性對(duì)妊娠合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣綜合征患者妊娠結(jié)局的影響[J].臨床內(nèi)科雜志,2021,38(8):522-525.
[4]梁彩銀,黎鳳美,黃任祥.經(jīng)鼻持續(xù)氣道正壓通氣對(duì)重度OSAHS患者腎損傷標(biāo)志物水平的影響[J].臨床肺科雜志,2020,25(5):689-692.
[5]韓健,尹琪華.蒙特利爾認(rèn)知評(píng)估量表在癲(癇)認(rèn)知功能障礙患者中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].中國(guó)臨床神經(jīng)科學(xué),2013,21(1):75-80.
[6]賀麗,王慧,白忠秀,等.42例女性IBS患者匹茲堡睡眠質(zhì)量指數(shù)評(píng)分調(diào)查分析[J].山東醫(yī)藥,2011,51(19):88-89.
[7]王亮,孟靜,楊超,等.呼吸機(jī)雙水平氣道正壓通氣治療重疊綜合征合并呼吸衰竭的療效評(píng)估[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)裝備,2021,18(1):90-94.
[8]李晨洋,許華俊,李馨儀,等.基于REDCap的CPAP干預(yù)對(duì)OSAHS患者認(rèn)知功能影響隨訪系統(tǒng)的建立和應(yīng)用[J].中國(guó)循證心血管醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2022,14(6):650-653.