徐凌靜


[摘要]目的 探討子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠的臨床效果。方法 選取2016年5月~2018年5月我院收治的70例剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠患者,根據(jù)入院時(shí)間分為觀察組與對(duì)照組,每組各35例。觀察組采用子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療,對(duì)照組采用子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并行經(jīng)陰道瘢痕妊娠物切除術(shù),比較兩組的手術(shù)相關(guān)指標(biāo)、手術(shù)成功率及不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率。結(jié)果 觀察組的血清人絨毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)轉(zhuǎn)陰時(shí)間為(22.32±2.36)d,病灶消失時(shí)間為(49.36±2.61)d,月經(jīng)恢復(fù)時(shí)間為(33.62±3.65)d,住院時(shí)間為(7.52±1.23)d,均短于對(duì)照組的(48.52±2.31)d、(69.56±3.82)d、(48.25±3.62)d、(15.22±1.39)d,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組的術(shù)中出血量為(33.69±2.31)ml,少于對(duì)照組的(71.23±6.69)ml,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組的手術(shù)成功率為94.29%,高于對(duì)照組的77.14%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率為2.96%,低于對(duì)照組的17.14%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論 子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠效果顯著,可減少術(shù)中出血量,加快患者康復(fù),減少術(shù)后并發(fā)癥,值得推廣。
[關(guān)鍵詞]子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞;宮腔鏡;剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠
[中圖分類號(hào)] R713 ? ? [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A ? ? [文章編號(hào)] 1674-4721(2019)9(b)-0104-03
Clinical effect of uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
XU Ling-jing
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fengcheng Mining Bureau General Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Fengcheng? ?331100, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effect of uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean section scar pregnancy. Methods A total of 70 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy from May 2016 to May 2018 in our hospital were selected. According to the admission time, they were divided into the observation group and the control group, 35 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopy, while the control group was treated with uterine artery embolization combined with transvaginal scar pregnancy resection. The operation related indicators, the success rate of operation and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The time of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) turning negative in the observation group was (22.32±2.36) d, the time of lesion disappearance was (49.36±2.61) d, the time of menstrual recovery was (33.62±3.65) d, and the time of hospitalization was (7.52±1.23) d, which were shorter than those in the control group ([48.52±2.31] d, [69.56±3.82] d, [48.25±3.62] d, [15.22±1.39]d), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was (33.69±2.31) ml, which was less than that in the control group ([71.23±6.69] ml), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The success rate of operation in the observation group was 94.29%, which was higher than 77.14% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 2.96%, which was lower than 17.14% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean section scar pregnancy has a significant effect, which can reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding, speed up the recovery of patients and reduce postoperative complications, and it is worthy of promotion.
[Key words] Uterine artery embolism; Hysteroscopy; Cesarean section scar pregnancy
瘢痕妊娠(scar pregnancy)是指有過(guò)剖宮產(chǎn)史的女性,在再次妊娠的時(shí)候,孕囊著床在子宮原瘢痕處,易導(dǎo)致陰道大量流血,晚期則可引發(fā)子宮破裂,是較難處理的異常妊娠,其兇險(xiǎn)程度不亞于意外妊娠,是產(chǎn)科醫(yī)生最頭痛的問(wèn)題之一[1-2]。產(chǎn)婦如在第一胎時(shí)選取剖宮產(chǎn),再次妊娠時(shí),需警惕瘢痕妊娠。產(chǎn)婦如出現(xiàn)瘢痕處疼痛、陰道流血等情況,應(yīng)立即到醫(yī)院檢查,及時(shí)干預(yù),以免發(fā)生子宮破裂或大出血。本病臨床治療以手術(shù)為主,隨著醫(yī)療技術(shù)的發(fā)展,手術(shù)選擇方式增多,子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療被逐漸廣泛應(yīng)用于臨床中,其具有創(chuàng)傷小、操作簡(jiǎn)便、恢復(fù)快等優(yōu)點(diǎn),得到患者及醫(yī)師的廣泛認(rèn)可。為進(jìn)一步探討其治療效果,本研究給予兩組患者不同手術(shù)方案干預(yù),對(duì)比分析手術(shù)結(jié)果,旨在為臨床治療提供更多參考,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1資料與方法
1.1一般資料
選取2016年5月~2018年5月我院收治的70例剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠患者,根據(jù)入院時(shí)間分為觀察組與對(duì)照組,每組各35例。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):無(wú)凝血功能障礙、傳染性疾病者;均自愿參與且知情同意者;未合并其他嚴(yán)重臟器疾病者。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):具有精神疾病史或認(rèn)知功能障礙者;依從性較差者;臨床資料不完善,中途退出者。觀察組中,年齡24~38歲,平均(29.12±2.11)歲。對(duì)照組中,年齡23~38歲,平均(29.18±2.33)歲。兩組的一般資料比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。本研究經(jīng)醫(yī)院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會(huì)審核批準(zhǔn)。
1.2方法
兩組患者均給予子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞治療,患者取平臥位,常規(guī)消毒鋪巾,于右腹股溝韌帶中點(diǎn)下0.5 cm處,且股動(dòng)脈搏動(dòng)最強(qiáng)處做穿刺點(diǎn),成功后將導(dǎo)管鞘送入,經(jīng)導(dǎo)管鞘將導(dǎo)管及導(dǎo)絲送至子宮動(dòng)脈處,將導(dǎo)絲撤出,注入造影劑,使用明膠海綿顆粒栓塞子宮動(dòng)脈,再次進(jìn)行造影,子宮動(dòng)脈及末梢消失,栓塞完成[3-4]。
對(duì)照組在子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞治療后,行經(jīng)陰道瘢痕妊娠物切除術(shù)。患者取膀胱截石位,常規(guī)消毒鋪巾,使用陰式拉鉤將陰道及宮頸充分暴露,使用宮頸鉗將宮頸前唇夾住下拉,暴露陰道前穹隆。將50 ml垂體后葉素鹽水注入陰道穹隆與膀胱宮頸間隙,將陰道前穹隆切開(kāi),上推膀胱,對(duì)組織進(jìn)行分析,暴露子宮下段,可見(jiàn)瘢痕組織膨出,于最突出部位,橫向?qū)⒉≡钋虚_(kāi),將妊娠組織完全剝出,清除凝血塊,使用紗布、電凝止血,無(wú)活動(dòng)性出血后,縫合切口,檢查切口無(wú)滲血,再次消毒,完成手術(shù)。觀察組在子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞治療后,給予宮腔鏡治療。患者取膀胱截石位,常規(guī)消毒鋪巾,宮腔鏡下定位,通過(guò)鉗夾將大部分組織胚胎清除,使用電切環(huán)對(duì)妊娠組織推刮,清除殘留病灶,病灶如向膀胱方向生長(zhǎng)并浸潤(rùn)至肌層者,可給予電切環(huán)進(jìn)行電切,對(duì)于出血點(diǎn)可采用鏡下電凝止血,或采用尿管水囊注入生理鹽水壓迫止血,術(shù)后24~45 h無(wú)明顯陰道出血后,即可拔出。兩組患者術(shù)后均給予常規(guī)抗感染治療。
1.3觀察指標(biāo)
記錄兩組患者的血清人絨毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)轉(zhuǎn)陰時(shí)間、病灶消失時(shí)間、月經(jīng)恢復(fù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間及術(shù)中出血量,同時(shí)統(tǒng)計(jì)兩組的手術(shù)成功率、術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率,其中術(shù)后并發(fā)癥主要為發(fā)熱、下腹部疼痛、腰骶部疼痛。
1.4統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS 19.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理,計(jì)量資料用均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(x±s)表示,兩組間比較采用t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料采用率表示,組間比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2結(jié)果
2.1兩組患者手術(shù)相關(guān)指標(biāo)的比較
觀察組的血β-HCG轉(zhuǎn)陰時(shí)間、病灶消失時(shí)間、月經(jīng)恢復(fù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間均短于對(duì)照組,且術(shù)中出血量少于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)(表1)。
2.2兩組手術(shù)成功率的比較
觀察組的手術(shù)成功率為94.29%(33/35),其中2例失敗者均為術(shù)中發(fā)生難以控制的出血,均中轉(zhuǎn)開(kāi)腹手術(shù)治療。對(duì)照組的手術(shù)成功率為77.14%(27/35),8例失敗者中,大出血5例,子宮穿孔2例,膀胱損傷1例,均中轉(zhuǎn)腹腔鏡或開(kāi)腹手術(shù)治療。兩組患者的手術(shù)治療成功率比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=4.200,P=0.040)。
2.3兩組不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率的比較
觀察組的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)(表2)。
3討論
剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠病因較為復(fù)雜,目前認(rèn)為,其主要發(fā)病因素為子宮缺損引起,即剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后子宮切口部位未完全愈合,存在缺陷,受精卵著床并種植于此處,蛻膜化不足,導(dǎo)致滋養(yǎng)細(xì)胞可直接侵入基層,易發(fā)生子宮破裂[5-7]。剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠無(wú)明顯臨床表現(xiàn),易出現(xiàn)誤診,患者如未得到及時(shí)治療,極易引發(fā)大出血,危及患者生命。本病臨床常用的治療措施有介入治療、腹腔鏡或腹部病灶切除等,但受到治療周期、并發(fā)癥及費(fèi)用高等因素的影響,治療效果不理想。隨著微創(chuàng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,聯(lián)合治療逐漸子臨床中被推廣[8-10]。
子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)在剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠治療中具有獨(dú)特的優(yōu)點(diǎn),可顯著減少術(shù)中出血量,加快妊娠組織死亡[11-13]。但其存在栓塞后綜合征,即術(shù)后易出現(xiàn)組織壞死、感染等并發(fā)癥,影響預(yù)后[14-16]。宮腔鏡手術(shù)通過(guò)利用人體自然通道,無(wú)手術(shù)切口,可直視下處理病灶,減少殘留發(fā)生,被廣泛地應(yīng)用于臨床中,且患者對(duì)宮腔鏡手術(shù)接受度較高,術(shù)后恢復(fù)快,疼痛較小,可加快患者康復(fù),改善預(yù)后。本研究結(jié)果顯示,觀察組的血β-HCG轉(zhuǎn)陰時(shí)間、病灶消失時(shí)間、月經(jīng)恢復(fù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間均短于對(duì)照組,且術(shù)中出血量少于對(duì)照組(P<0.05),提示子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療可減少術(shù)中出血量,降低對(duì)機(jī)體的損傷,加快機(jī)體恢復(fù),進(jìn)而縮短住院時(shí)間。先給予患者子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù),對(duì)病灶進(jìn)行初步處理,再經(jīng)過(guò)宮腔鏡切除病灶,無(wú)需切口,能夠盡最大可能地降低對(duì)機(jī)體的損傷,進(jìn)而改善預(yù)后。本研究結(jié)果顯示,觀察組的手術(shù)成功率高于對(duì)照組,且并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05),提示子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療具有較高的成功率,且術(shù)后并發(fā)癥較低,具有顯著的臨床應(yīng)用效果。分析其原因,與手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷小,術(shù)野清晰密切相關(guān)。醫(yī)師通過(guò)宮腔鏡,可全面探查患者病灶,及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)異常情況,并給予干預(yù),提升手術(shù)成功率。同時(shí),宮腔鏡手術(shù)通過(guò)自然通道,對(duì)機(jī)體創(chuàng)傷小,術(shù)中出血量較少,術(shù)后恢復(fù)快,因此并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率較低。宮腔鏡手術(shù)可最大限度地保留子宮完整性,使用環(huán)形電極及時(shí)清除病灶,定點(diǎn)電凝止血,能夠有效減少盲目刮宮引發(fā)的大出血,可避免子宮內(nèi)膜損傷,降低宮腔粘連發(fā)生率,還可對(duì)子宮瘢痕局部缺陷進(jìn)行修正,預(yù)防復(fù)發(fā)。本研究仍存在不足之處,如選取樣本較少,研究時(shí)間較短等,需進(jìn)一步改進(jìn)。同時(shí)研究中發(fā)現(xiàn),部分患者治療期間多伴有不同程度的心理壓力,導(dǎo)致機(jī)體應(yīng)激反應(yīng)增高,手術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)提升,在今后的工作中,需強(qiáng)化心理干預(yù),降低患者心理壓力,消除負(fù)性情緒,同時(shí)不斷學(xué)習(xí),提升自身知識(shí)技能水平,以便為患者提供更多幫助。
綜上所述,子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞并宮腔鏡治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠效果顯著,可減少術(shù)中出血量,加快患者康復(fù),減少術(shù)后并發(fā)癥,值得推廣。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]莫堅(jiān),黃建邕,黃英梅.選擇性子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)聯(lián)合宮腔鏡手術(shù)治療外生型剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后子宮瘢痕妊娠的臨床分析[J].臨床和實(shí)驗(yàn)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2017,16(8):800-803.
[2]王遠(yuǎn)航,韓宇寧,劉佳,等.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)后經(jīng)陰道與經(jīng)宮腔鏡治療外生型剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠臨床療效分析[J].現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展,2017,17(6):1086-1089.
[3]剛君,高萬(wàn)里,宋風(fēng)麗,等.選擇性子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)聯(lián)合宮腔鏡手術(shù)治療外生型剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后子宮瘢痕妊娠的療效觀察[J].醫(yī)學(xué)臨床研究,2017,34(7):1390-1392.
[4]王捷文,李紅雨.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)結(jié)合宮腔鏡清宮和甲氨蝶呤結(jié)合宮腔鏡清宮治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠療效對(duì)比[J].中國(guó)臨床醫(yī)生雜志,2017,45(6):105-106.
[5]陳為,黃立萍,車?yán)ぬm,等.宮腔鏡手術(shù)與子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠的臨床療效比較[J].實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2018, 34(14):2333-2335.
[6]李燕,王娟,馬俊旗.宮腔鏡聯(lián)合子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)治療剖宮產(chǎn)切口瘢痕妊娠患者的效果及安全性[J].河北醫(yī)藥,2017, 39(15):2314-2316.
[7]張坤,田藝,左俠.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)聯(lián)合宮腔鏡手術(shù)治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕部位妊娠的臨床療效[J].陜西醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2017, 46(12):1662-1663,1665.
[8]Hong Y,Guo Q,Pu Y,et al.Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy:a retrospective study[J].Medicine,2017,96(30):e7687.
[9]李瑛,羅軍.藥物預(yù)處理與子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)對(duì)宮腔鏡下清宮術(shù)治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠療效的影響[J].國(guó)際婦產(chǎn)科學(xué)雜志,2018,45(4):401-404.
[10]韓艷,張俊娣,楊露.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)對(duì)剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠清宮效果的影響及安全性[J].中國(guó)計(jì)劃生育和婦產(chǎn)科,2017,9(2):29-32.
[11]邢慧敏,梁軍,耿曉,等.宮腹腔鏡聯(lián)合手術(shù)在剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠治療中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].解放軍醫(yī)藥雜志,2016,28(9):90-92.
[12]張艷麗.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞聯(lián)合宮腔鏡手術(shù)治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠的效果觀察[J].河南醫(yī)學(xué)研究,2018,27(5):909-910.
[13]王素華.剖宮產(chǎn)切口瘢痕妊娠患者采用宮腔鏡及子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)聯(lián)合治療的效果及安全性分析[J].中國(guó)內(nèi)鏡雜志,2016,22(9):84-87.
[14]任冉.剖宮產(chǎn)切口瘢痕妊娠患者行宮腔鏡聯(lián)合子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞術(shù)治療的臨床療效觀察[J].中國(guó)婦幼保健,2016,31(23):4992-4995.
[15]許丹,高成珍,薛金玲.子宮動(dòng)脈栓塞聯(lián)合宮腔鏡治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕部位妊娠的臨床研究[J].南通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版),2016,36(5):482-484.
[16]羅輝,姚愛(ài)香,張豐萍.子宮動(dòng)脈灌注化療栓塞聯(lián)合宮腔鏡清宮治療剖宮產(chǎn)瘢痕妊娠[J].中國(guó)微創(chuàng)外科雜志,2014, 14(6):568-569.
(收稿日期:2019-03-14? 本文編輯:祁海文)