王忠輝
【摘要】 目的 分析對膽總管結石患者給予內鏡下乳頭括約肌小切開(SEST)聯合球囊擴張術(EPBD)治療的臨床應用效果。方法 180例膽總管結石患者, 采用隨機分組法分為聯合組和對比組, 各90例。聯合組患者采用內鏡下SEST聯合EPBD治療, 對比組患者采用內鏡下乳頭括約肌切開術(EST)治療。觀察比較兩組患者首次結石取出成功率、機械碎石器使用率;術后觀察高淀粉酶血癥、急性胰腺炎、出血、穿孔等近期并發癥發生情況。結果 兩組患者首次結石取出成功率比較差異無統計學意義
(P>0.05);聯合組患者機械碎石器使用率為14.4%, 明顯低于對比組的28.9%, 差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);聯合組近期并發癥發生率為16.7%, 低于對比組的28.9%, 差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 膽總管結石采用內鏡下SEST聯合EPBD治療的臨床效果顯著, 術后并發癥較少, 值得臨床推廣和應用。
【關鍵詞】 乳頭括約肌小切開;球囊擴張術;膽總管結石
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.29.002
【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the clinical application effect of small endoscopic sphincterotomy (SEST) combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) in the treatment of common bile duct stones. Methods A total of 180 common bile duct stones patients were divided by random grouping method into combination group and control group, with 90 cases in each group. The combination group was treated with endoscopic SEST and EPBD, and the control group was treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Observation and comparison were made on success rate of first stone removal and utilization rate of mechanical lithotripsy between two groups. Observation were made on occurrence of postoperative complications of amylase, acute pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. Results Both groups had no statistically significant difference in success rate of first stone removal (P>0.05). The combination group had obviously lower utilization rate of mechanical lithotripsy as 14.4% than 28.9% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The combination group had lower incidence of recent complications as 16.7% than 28.9% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic SEST and EPBD shows remarkable clinical effect for common bile duct stones with less postoperative complications, and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
【Key words】 Small endoscopic sphincterotomy; Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation; Common bile duct stones
膽總管結石是肝膽外科常見的疾病之一, 患者臨床表現為腹痛、發熱、黃疸等。手術取石是臨床治療膽總管結石最直接有效的方法, 以往主要采用EST治療, 操作簡單, 但是創傷性強, 術后并發癥較多, 影響整體手術效果。針對這一現狀, 內鏡逆行胰膽管造影術(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP )應運而生, 以其微創、簡便、安全性高等優點[1], 逐漸了取代傳統開放手術。內鏡手術有EPBD、SEST兩種術式, 各有優缺點。本院對膽總管結石患者實施SEST、EPBD聯合治療, 取得了較為滿意的治療效果, 現報告如下。
1 資料與方法
1. 1 一般資料 選擇2015年1月~2016年8月本院收治的180例(已排除插管不成功者7例)膽總管結石患者為研究對象。按照隨機分組法將患者分為聯合組和對比組, 每組90例。兩組患者性別、年齡、總膽紅素水平、合并乳頭憩室、結石直徑等一般資料比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。見表1……