英文摘要

Abstracts

An?Analysis?of?the?Securitization?of?U.S.?Relations?with?China

DING?Di

Abstract：?National?security?has?always?been?a?core?issue?of?concern?to?the?United?States.?The?U.S.?government?has?increasingly?securitized?many?aspects?of?the?bilateral?relationship，?including?trade?links，?scientific?and?technological?collaboration，?and?cultural?exchange.?The?securitization?of?U.S.?relations?with?China?has?caused?the?United?States?to?fall?into?paradoxes?in?terms?of?its?identity?recognition，?policy?motivations，?and?choice?of?means?vis-à-vis?China.?Excessive?securitization?has?further?intensified?the?zero-sum?game?between?China?and?the?United?States，?while?pan-securitization?has?led?to?the?proliferation?of?various?new?security?risks?in?the?international?community?and?worsened?the?global?security?environment.?The?securitization?of?U.S.?relations?with?China?has?gradually?gone?to?extremes，?shaking?the?foundation?of?post-Cold?War?global?strategic?stability.?China?and?the?United?States?should?fully?understand?the?serious?consequences?of?out-of-control?securitization?and?put?Sino-U.S.?relations?back?on?a?controllable?route.

Keywords：?U.S.-China?competition，?securitization，?strategic stability，?security?interaction

The?Biden?Administration’s?High-Technology?Export?Control?Policy?Toward?China

HAN?Zhaoying?and?LIU?Jin

Abstract：?High-technology?export?control?stands?as?a?pivotal?policy?instrument?in?the?United?States’?strategy?to?contain?China’s?technological?advancements.?Since?assuming?office，?the?Biden?administration?has?introduced?new?dimensions?to?U.S.?export?control?policies，?featuring?precision?in?controlling?specific?items，?an?expanded?discretionary?authority?for?the?U.S.?Department?of?Commerce，?a?shift?from?unilateralism?towards?a?multilateral?export?control?alliance，?and?an?ideological?framing?of?the?rationale?behind?export?controls.?The?Biden?administration?underscores?the?decisive?importance?of?high-technology?competition，?not?only?due?to?its?inherent?innovation-accelerating?nature?but?also?as?China’s?technological?ascent?poses?challenges?to?U.S.?national?security?and?its?dominant?position?in?the?global?industrial?chain.?While?various?limiting?factors?impact?the?effectiveness?of?U.S.?technological?sanctions?against?China，?export?controls?still?exert?a?certain?degree?of?pressure?on?the?international?market?for?Chinese?high-technology?enterprises，?elevating?the?risk?of?disruption?within?the?global?industrial?chain.?In?response?to?the?escalating?U.S.?high-technology?export?control?policy，?China?should?proactively?construct?a?risk-prevention?system，?adopt?asymmetric?countermeasures，?and?leverage?its?rights?to?expand?international?technological?cooperation.

Keywords：?high-technology，?export?control，?U.S.-China?relations，?technology?competition

From?Complementarity?to?Competition：?An?Analysis?of?Sino-U.S.?Relationship?in?African?Infrastructure?Development

ZHOU?Jinyan?and?ZHOU?Yuyuan

Abstract：?Infrastructure?development?is?a?key?area?of?China-Africa?cooperation.?Since?China?proposed?the?Belt?and?Road?Initiative?（BRI），?some?Western?countries，?which?have?neglected?African?infrastructure?development?for?decades，?have?begun?to?alter?their?attitudes?and?proposed?global?infrastructure?initiatives，?such?as?Build?Back?Better?World?（B3W）?and?Partnership?for?Global?Infrastructure?and?Investment?（PGII）.?The?Western?initiatives?have?been?taken?as?countermeasures?against?China’s?BRI.?However，?U.S.?single-mined?focus?on?strategic?competition?tends?to?exaggerate?the?disparate?interests?and?dueling?narratives?between?;China?and?the?United?States?regarding?African?infrastructure?development.?While?Beijing?focuses?on?African?hard?infrastructure?construction，?Washington?values?such?soft?sides?as?rule-making.?The?“different?but?complementary”?relationship?has?been?recognized?and?affirmed?by?both?sides?during?the?period?when?the?United?States?adopted?engagement?and?integration?strategy?toward?China.?Since?Washington?identified?China?as?a?strategic?competitor，?infrastructure?has?been?regarded?as?a?tool?for?great?power?rivalry.?In?fact，?China?takes?African?infrastructure?as?a?development?issue?and?strives?to?meet?the?needs?of?African?countries.?The?two?powers?should?joint?hands?to?promote?infrastructure?development?in?Africa.

Keywords：?China，?the?United?States，?Africa，?infrastructure，?complementarity，?competition

The?“Justice?Deficit”?of?the?International?Order?and?China’s?Plan

YOU?Qiming

Abstract：?A?resurgent?China?emphasizes?the?need?to?promote?the?development?of?the?existing?international?order?in?a?more?just?and?reasonable?direction.?Justice?involves?two?core?issues：?equal?treatment?and?fair?distribution，?including?two?main?types：?consequential?justice?and?procedural?justice，?which?provide?important?legitimacy?support?for?the?stable?operation?of?the?international?order.?Although?the?existing?international?order?has?made?progress?in?both?dimensions，?it?still?has?a?“consequential?justice?deficit”?and?“procedural?justice?deficit.”?China?has?its?own?“view?of?justice”?in?the?international?order，?which?mainly?emphasizes?the?cornerstone role?of?national?sovereignty，?attaches?great?importance?to?upholding?the?central?status?of?the?United?Nations?by?adhering?to?the?real?multilateralism，?leans?toward?the?"common?but?differentiated"?principle?for?distribution，?and?build?a?"community?with?a?shared?future?for?mankind."?To?promote?the?reform?of?the?existing?international?order?in?a?more?just?and?reasonable?direction，?China?should?realize?Chinese-style?modernization，?adhere?to?the?guideline?of?action?of?consultation，?co-construction，?inclusiveness?and?sharing，?and?creatively?disseminate?China’s?“international?order?narrative.”

Keywords：?international?order，?international?justice，?justice?deficit，?Chinese?concept?of?justice，?The?community?with?a?shared?future?for?mankind

Euroscepticism?in?Central?and?Eastern?Europe?and?the?Future?of?European?Integration

WANG?Hongyi

Abstract：?This?paper?selects?seven?political?parties?with?Euroscepticism?tendency?in?the?post-2015?ruling?parties?or?ruling?coalitions?in?the?CEE?region?as?case?studies，?and?proposes?a?theoretical?framework?centered?on?economic?Euroscepticism，?cultural?Euroscepticism，?and?sovereignty?Euroscepticism.?Under?this?framework，?Euroscepticism?in?the?CEE?region?can?be?classified?into?three?types：?a?multiple?hybrid?model?based?on?"culture-economy-sovereignty，"?a?dual?hybrid?model?based?on?"culture-sovereignty，"?and?the?single?model?of?cultural?Euroscepticism.?Among?them，?cultural?Euroscepticism?is?a?common?feature???Euro-sceptic?political?parties?in?Central?and?Eastern?Europe，?and?this?feature?is?all?closely?related?to?the?traditional?Christian?culture.?Overall，?CEE?Eurosceptic?parties’?complaints?and?criticism?toward?EU?policies?fully?expose?the?rift?between?Eastern?and?Western?Europe?in?terms?of?historical?memory?and?values，?which?constrains?the?future?development?of?the?EU?in?terms?of?integration?in?the?sociocultural?and?political?spheres.

Keywords：?Central?and?Eastern?Europe，?Euroscepticism，?EU，?European?integration

The?Perceptions?and?Realities?of?Political?and?Social?Preferences?among?Russian?Youth

ZHANG?Huimin

Abstract：?Against?the?backdrop?of?global?geopolitical?turbulence?and?continual?adjustments?in?Russia’s?domestic?policies，?the?perspectives?of?Russian?young?individuals?on?social?and?political?developments?warrant?attention.?This?article?categorizes?Russian?youth?by?generations?and?employs?data?gathered?by?the?Russian?Public?Opinion?Research?Center?from?58?consecutive?monthly?polls?conducted?since?July?2018?to?examine?the?distinctive?features?of?Russian?youth?concerning?political?and?social?preferences.?The?study?reveals?that?generational?disparities?in?the?evaluation?of?the?federal?presidency?and?foreign?policy?in?Russian?society?have?become?more?pronounced?since?2020.?The?youngest?“stable?generation”?in?present-day?Russian?society?tends?to?exhibit?a?balanced?approach?to?federal?and?local?public?affairs.?In?general，?young?Russian?adults?do?not?emerge?as?the?most?critically-minded?group?in?Russian?society.?The?“stable?generation”?maintains?a?more?moderate?stance?toward?economic?and?social?affairs?compared?to?the?older?“reform?generation”?and?“millennials.”?The?political?and?social?preferences?of?the?Russian?populace?are?more?shaped?by?the?societal?changes?they?have?undergone?than?by?their?life?stage.?The?foundational?perspectives?on?public?affairs?from?previous?generations?of?Russians?persist?within?the?youth?demographic.

Keywords：?Russian?youth，?political?preferences，?social?attitudes，?intergenerational?differences

The?United?States’?Blue?Pacific?Partnership：?Motivations，?Characteristics，?and?Impacts

ZHOU?Shixin

Abstract：?Introduced?by?the?Pacific?Island?Forum?in?2017，?the?concept?of?the?“Blue?Pacific”?underscores?regional?identity?and?national?strategic?autonomy.?In?June?2022，?the?United?States，?in?collaboration?with?four?allies，?established?the?Blue?Pacific?Partnership，?despite?the?absence?of?a?true?Pacific?island?country.?Consequently，?the?United?States initiated?the?Pacific?Partnership?to?strengthen?its?ties?with?Pacific?island?nations.?Presently，?the?United?States?perceives?a?significant?rise?in?the?importance?of?the?Pacific?region?within?its?global?geopolitical?strategy.?To?assert?regional?dominance，?the?United?States?has?allocated?increased?resources，?garnered?support?from?allied?nations，?and?sought?to?enhance?connections?with?Pacific?island?countries.?This?dynamic?has?become?a?crucial?variable?influencing?the?situation?in?the?Pacific?region.?While?Pacific?island?countries?maintain?close?collaboration?with?the?United?States?and?its?allies，?they?are?reluctant?to?be?drawn?into?the?geopolitical?competition?among?major?powers.?Looking?ahead，?the?United?States?anticipates?unconditional?cooperation?from?Pacific?island?countries，?but?the?ability?to?uphold?regional?security?and?development?remains?uncertain?due?to?challenges?faced?by?the?United?States?and?its?allies?in?fulfilling?commitments.?The?competitive?nature?of?the?Blue?Pacific?Partnership?may?impact?China’s?relationships?with?regional?countries.?Therefore，?China?should?continue?constructive?engagement?with?Pacific?island?nations，?fostering?a?positive?regional?environment.

Keywords：?Blue?Pacific?Partnership，?Pacific?Partnership，?Indo-Pacific?strategy，?Pacific?Island?Forum

Transformation?and?Adjustment：?New?Zealand’s?“Pacific?Reset”?Policy

TANG?Jie

Abstract：?Against?the?backdrop?of?intensified?climate?change?and?geopolitical?games，?Pacific?island?countries?have?transitioned?from?being?relatively?unnoticed?to?becoming?a?focal?point?of?international?attention.?Simultaneously，?the?regional?influence?of?New?Zealand?has?experienced?a?degree?of?weakening?due?to?the?enhanced?strategic?autonomy?of?Pacific?Island?countries.?In?March?2018，?the?New?Zealand?Labour?coalition?government?introduced?the?“Pacific?Reset”?policy，?built?upon?the?principles?of?friendship，?understanding，?reciprocity，?collective?ambition，?and?sustainability.?The?objective?is?to?establish?a?stable，?prosperous，?and?resilient?Pacific，?restoring?the?roles?of?regional?leaders?and?partners.?To?actualize?the?“Pacific?Reset”?policy，?the?New?Zealand?government?has?continuously?bolstered?political?and?diplomatic?connections，?increased?military?and?security?investments，?broadened?economic?and?cultural?influence，?and?deepened?efforts?in?climate?and?other?forms?of?social?governance.?However，?New?Zealand?still?needs?to?navigate?challenges?related?to?reconciling?divergent?interests，?maintaining?long-term?strategic?stability，?and?avoiding?geopolitical?games?to?enhance?the?efficacy?of?the?“Pacific?Reset”?policy.?In?the?context?of?China-New?Zealand?relations，?both?nations?must?work?to?sidestep?the?pitfalls?of?geopolitical?maneuvering.?Leveraging?the?“Blue?Pacific?2050?Strategy”?as?an?opportunity，?they?should?establish?cooperative?mechanisms?through?bilateral?and?multilateral?platforms?in?a?pragmatic?manner，?grounded?in?mutual?respect?and?a?commitment?to?mutual?benefit.?Overcoming?external?interference?remains?crucial?for?advancing?the?development?of?bilateral?relations.

Keywords：?New?Zealand，?“Pacific?Reset”?policy，?Pacific?region，?China-New?Zealand?relations