陳際蘇

[摘要] 目的 探討銀杏達莫配合依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死的應激指標和神經功能變化。方法 方便選取該院2016年1月—2018年1月收治的90例急性腦梗死患者,根據不同治療方法分為兩組,對照組(n=45)給予依達拉奉治療,觀察組(n=45)在對照組基礎上接受銀杏達莫治療,對比兩組患者血清應激指標和神經遞質指標以及治療前后神經功能缺損程度和臨床療效。結果 觀察組IL-6、IL-10、CRP、AOPP、GSH-Px、ox-LDL、MDA、SOD分別為(72.73±3.90)pg/mL、(22.24±1.51)μg/L、(9.29±0.44)mg/L、(76.23±2.63)μmol/L、(40.29±5.17)mg/mL、(86.91±4.15)U/mL、(3.19±0.45)nmol/mL、(163.65±12.04)U/mL,明顯優于對照組(135.74±7.10)pg/mL、(40.07±1.67)μg/L、(15.58±1.13)mg/L、(93.84±3.05)μmol/L、(31.76±4.08)mg/mL、(94.49±5.04)U/mL、(5.55±0.31)nmol/mL、(126.23±10.68)U/mL,差異有統計學意義(t=12.179 2、13.035 3、14.795 6、9.332 4、8.688 3、7.788 4、18.971 7、15.597 0,P<0.05)。觀察組NSE、Glu、NAA、VAP、NGF、NTF、GABA、NPY分別為(12.24±1.51)μg/L、(72.73±2.90)μmol/L、(430.29±16.44)mmol/L、(8.23±1.63)ng/L、(90.29±2.17)pg/mL、(5.91±0.65)ng/mL、(9.19±0.75)μmol/L、(171.63±5.04)μg/L,明顯優于對照組(20.07±1.67)μg/L、(85.74±4.10)μmol/L、(376.58±13.13)mmol/L、(13.64±1.27)ng/L、(61.76±2.08)pg/mL、(3.49±0.44)ng/mL、(6.55±0.61)μmol/L、(184.55±5.68)μg/L,差異有統計學意義(t=13.329 6、7.378 4、7.124 6、7.563 0、6.670 3、10.682 2、8.318 8、11.413 4,P<0.05)。治療后觀察組NIHSS評分(12.24±1.51)分明顯低于對照組(19.57±1.67)分,差異有統計學意義(t=8.466 4,P<0.05)。兩組患者臨床療效對比95.56%vs82.22%差異有統計學意義(χ2=9.009 8,P<0.05)。 結論 銀杏達莫配合依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死可改善改善神經功能,因此值得臨床推廣。
[關鍵詞] 銀杏達莫;依達拉奉;急性腦梗死;應激指標;神經功能
[中圖分類號] R255? ? ? ? ? [文獻標識碼] A? ? ? ? ? [文章編號] 1674-0742(2019)05(c)-0138-03
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the stress and neurological changes of Yinxingdamo combined with edaravone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Methods Convenient select ninety patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital (January 2016 to January 2018) were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods. The control group (n=45) was treated with edaravone, and the observation group ( n=45) was treated on the basis of the control group with Yinxingdamo, and the serum stress index and neurotransmitter index of the two groups were compared with the degree of neurological deficit and clinical efficacy before and after treatment. Results The IL-6, IL-10, CRP, AOPP, GSH-Px, ox-LDL, MDA and SOD in the observation group were (72.73±3.90)pg/mL, (22.24±1.51)μg/L and (9.29±0.44)mg/L, (76.23±2.63)μmol/L, (40.29±5.17)mg/mL, (86.91±4.15)U/mL, (3.19±0.45)nmol/mL, (163.65±12.04)U/mL, significantly better than the control group (135.74±7.10)pg/mL, (40.07±1.67)μg/L, (15.58±1.13)mg/L, (93.84±3.05)μmol/L, (31.76±4.08)mg/mL, (94.49±5.04)U/mL, (5.55±0.31)nmol/mL, and (126.23±10.68)U/mL, the difference was statistically significant (t=12.179 2, 13.035 3, 14.795 6, 9.332 4, 8.688 3, 7.788 4, 18.971 7, 15.597 0, P<0.05). The NSE, Glu, NAA, VAP, NGF, NTF, GABA, and NPY of the observation group were (12.24±1.51)μg/L, (72.73±2.90)μmol/L, (430.29±16.44)mmol/L, and (8.23±1.63)ng/L, (90.29±2.17)pg/mL,(5.91±0.65)ng/mL, (9.19±0.75)μmol/L, (171.63±5.04)μg/L, significantly better than the control group (20.07±1.67) μg/L, (85.74±4.10)μmol/L, (376.58±13.13)mmol/L, (13.64±1.27)ng/L, (61.76±2.08)pg/mL, (3.49±0.44)ng/mL, (6.55±0.61) μmol/L and (184.55±5.68)μg/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=13.329 6, 7.378 4, 7.124 6, 7.563 0, 6.670 3, 10.682 2, 8.318 8, 11.443 4, P<0.05). After treatment, the NIHSS score of the observation group was (12.24±1.51)points, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.57±1.67)points. The difference was statistically significant (t=8.466 4, P<0.05). The clinical efficacy of the two groups was significantly different from 95.56% vs 82.22%, which was statistically significant (χ2=9.009 8, P<0.05). Conclusion Yinxingdamo combined with edaravone can improve the improvement of neurological function in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
[參考文獻]
[1]? 楊成.銀杏達莫聯合依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死的臨床療效觀察[J].實用心腦肺血管病雜志,2016,24(4):97-99.
[2]? 李志峰.依達拉奉與銀杏達莫對2型糖尿病并發急性腦梗死的治療效果[J].深圳中西醫結合雜志,2018,28(15):50-52.
[3]? 任俊龍.觀察銀杏達莫聯合依達拉奉治療老年腦梗死患者的臨床效果[J].中國醫藥指南,2018,16(12):110.
[4]? 葉超雄,周敏華,何劍鋒.補陽還五湯加減佐治氣虛血瘀型腦卒中療效及成本分析[J].光明中醫,2018,33(4):493-496.
[5]? 李向彧.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫輔助治療急性腦梗死患者療效觀察[J].山西醫藥雜志,2018,47(3):309-311.
[6]? 張惠卿,張曉敏,董喜英.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫治療急性腦梗死的臨床療效[J].臨床合理用藥雜志,2017,10(21):49-50.
[7]? 高躍強.銀杏達莫聯合依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死的臨床療效及其對患者炎癥因子的影響[J].神經損傷與功能重建,2017,12(1):93-94.
[8]? 夏克志.淺析銀杏達莫聯合依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死的臨床療效及安全性[J].中國現代藥物應用,2016,10(20):18-19.
[9]? 林鵬,高偉,丘賀,等.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫治療2型糖尿病合并急性腦梗塞的臨床效果分析[J].現代生物醫學進展,2016,16(29):5677-5680.
[10]? 嚴燁,冷狂風,陳文麗.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫對缺血性腦卒中患者血清白細胞介素6和腫瘤壞死因子α水平的影響[J].中國醫院用藥評價與分析,2016,16(9):1169-1171.
[11]? 王世君,曾兆云,徐青青,等.天丹通絡膠囊聯合銀杏達莫和依達拉奉治療急性腦梗死的臨床研究[J].現代藥物與臨床,2016,31(9):1342-1346.
[12]? 鄭宋元.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫治療急性腦梗死的療效觀察[J].現代診斷與治療,2016,27(17):3191-3193.
[13]? 牛強.依達拉奉聯合銀杏達莫治療腦梗死的臨床療效[J].中國實用神經疾病雜志,2016,19(8):11-13.
(收稿日期:2019-02-23)