Linguistic features of third parties’ interruption in medical interruption

李陽

Abstract：With the rise of interruption study in medical interaction， scholars home and abroad pay more and more attention on it. However， the study mostly focuses on doctors and patients， and the third party is often neglected. In China， medical conversation involving third party is common， so the study of third party in China is significant. This dissertation intends to explore linguistic features of third parties interruption.

Key words：third party； interruption； medical conversation

1. Introduction

Based on Zimmerman and Wests （1975） definition， this paper defines interruption as follows： the interrupter intrudes the current speaker's turn-taking structure， which occurs at non-turn construction units， leading that the speaker does not express a complete turn or meanings. In the following， the author intends to illustrate these features.

2. Phonetic features

2.1 Rushing speed

Rushing speed means that the speed of speaking suddenly increases. The combination of “more than” symbols indicates that the talk between them is compressed.

Example 1：

醫生：幾點磕的？

病人：晚上8點了吧。

陪同：應該。

醫生：晚上是吧？

陪同：40分鐘前把差不多。

When doctor inquire the injured time to make a diagnosis， patients and third party answer the doctors question simultaneously. After their answers， the doctor intends to further confirmation of injury time. Third party make a hurry interruption by making a rushing speed.

2.2 Stretching speed

Stretching speed means that the speed of speaking suddenly decreases， symbolizing the “less than” marks. They can indicate a stretch of talk is slowed.

Example 2：

陪同：那您看這個結果是什么。

醫生：尿的這個里邊兒，里邊兒有個潛血。一般有兩種可能。第一種可能是有腎結石，另一種可能就是泌尿性感染。

陪同：泌尿性，泌尿性感染。

Third party aims to inquire diagnosis results. In line 3， detailed explanation is given by the doctor. Before the doctor gives the second possible findings， third party gives his reasoning to interrupt marked by the “less than” marks.

3. Lexical features

3.1 Minimal response

When third party interrupts others， some minimal response such as那， 那個 are used. However， in different situations， these words function differently.

3.1.1 Anaphora

Anaphora refers to the same entity as a prior linguistic expression refers to.

Example 3：

醫生：所以這個需要檢查。

醫生：照個CT把。

陪同：那能照出來眼睛么？

The doctor suggests that patient should do a check to confirm under CT check. In the line 3， the third party interrupt the doctor by using the minimal word “那”.

3.1.2 Cataphoric reference

Cataphoric reference means that the same entity happens in the later expression.

Example 4：

陪同：那就寫那個周一的日子吧，反正周六日。

醫生：它是自動生成的時間，只能是從今天開始。

第三方：那，第三針是不是周一打？

Third party and doctor are discussing the time of injection. When the doctor corrects the accurate injection time， third party interrupts at the line 3 to by using the deixis “那”， which refers “第三針”.

3.2 Social deixis

Social deixis means that information of concerning social identities of participants or the social identities of participants or the social relationship between them.

3.2.1 Ordinary address

Ordinary address commonly is used in third parties interrupting patients. In the data， second personal pronounce“你” is used.

Example 5：

患者：這個藥不吃了嗎？

醫生：吃。你一天

患者：那：

陪同：你別問了我們知道。

患者：哦。

The patient initiates a question whether the medicine needs taking and doctor answers. Additionally， when the patient intends to inquiry more questions， third party interrupts by the usage of “你”.

3.2.2 Honorifics

Different from the previous one， honorifics are used to refer doctors. When third party interrupts doctors， second personal honorific “您” is used to show his respect.

Example 6：

病人：就是咱那（打斷）。

醫生：把吃這些藥，這次可能就是過敏，有點過敏，但是沒事。

陪同：那您是想說那個。

The doctor indicates that patient may be allergic to drugs， third party interrupts with incomplete meanings by using the second honorific “您”.

4. Structural features

Structural features connect with grammar. In medical conversation， interruptions function closely relates with grammatical clauses.

4.1 Declarative clause

Thompson （2008） refers that statement are most naturally expressed by declarative clauses.

Example 7：

醫生：惡心吐嗎？

病人：不惡心吐。

第三方：她原來吧，一直說她有那個腸子有氣兒。

醫生：腸梗阻啊？

When the doctor asks whether the patient has nausea， third party takes the floor to state. Such interruption is stated in the form of declarative clause.

4.2 Interrogative clause

As Thompson noted （2008）， questions are raised in the form of imperative clause.

Example 8：

陪同：那就寫那個周一的日子吧。

醫生：它那是自動生成的時間，只能是從今天開始。

第三方：那，那個第三針是不是周一打？

Third party intends to negotiate the injection time at Monday but the doctor shows that injection time is started from today. Third party interrupts. The initiated interruption is in the form of interrogative clause.

5. Summary

This chapter is mainly based on qualitative research， which combines terms and detailed examples. After the discussion， linguistic features are three aspects： phonetic features， lexical features and structural features. In the first aspect， features include rushing speed and stretching speed； lexical ones are concerned with minimal response and social deixis； the last are declaration clause， imperative clause.

【References】

[1] Roter， D. （2006）. Foreword.In Heritage， J. & Maynard， D. W. （eds.）. Communication in medical care： Interaction between primary care physician and patients （pp. 214-247）. Cambridge： Cambridge University Press.

[2] Sacks， H.， E.A. Schegloff.， & G. Jefferson. （1974） A Simplest Systematics for the organization Turn-taking in Conversation. Language in society， 596-753.

[3] Schegloff， E. A. （2000）. Accounts of Conduct in Interaction： Interruption， Overlap， and Turn-Taking. Handbook of Sociological Theory.

[4] 梁 婷. 美國醫生和患者對話的會話分析[D]. 長春： 吉林大學， 2007.

[5] 劉曉佳. 第三方在陳述病情時所起的作用[D]. 太原： 山西大學碩士論文， 2011.