T4 cervical esophageal cancer cured with modern chemoradiotherapy:A case report

Chia Ching Lee,Chong Ming Yeo,Wee Khoon Ng,Akash Verma,Jeremy CS Tey

Chia Ching Lee,Jeremy CS Tey,Department of Radiation Oncology,National University Cancer Institute,National University Hospital,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore 119228,Singapore

Chong Ming Yeo, Department of Medical Oncology,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore 308433,Singapore

Wee Khoon Ng, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore 308433,Singapore

Akash Verma,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore 308433,Singapore

Abstract

Key words:Esophageal cancer;Chemoradiotherapy;Fistula;Stenting;T4;Case report

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent advances in multidisciplinary treatments,the outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer invading into adjacent structures remain unsatisfactory[1,2].T4 disease portends a poor prognosis,particularly when it is complicated by a tracheoesophageal fistula(TEF)which can result from the disease or occur as a complication of treatment due to the resultant tumor necrosis and shrinkage[3].The incidence of malignant fistulas developing during chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer is reported to be 5% to 22%[4,5].Closure of malignant fistulas have been observed in 70% patients after treatment[3].

To date,there is no consensus on the optimal treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer complicated by a TEF[1].The two-common curative-intent treatment approaches are definitive chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection.However,treating clinicians may opt to switch the treatment intent from curative to palliative when a TEF forms during treatment,because TEF-associated treatment complications such as aspiration pneumonia and mediastinitis are associated with high morbidity and mortality[6,7].

Herein,we present a case of unresectable T4 cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SCC)complicated by a TEF during treatment,who completed treatment successfully with modern image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)and concurrent carboplatin-paclitaxel.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 67-year-old male ex-smoker was referred from primary care physician to Department of General Surgery of our hospital in March 2018 with worsening dysphagia.

History of present illness

Patient's symptoms started 3 mo ago,associated with weight loss of 7 kg over past 2 mo.

History of past illness

He did not have any past medical or surgical illness,except appendicectomy.

Personal and family history

His mother was diagnosed with cervix cancer.

Physical examination upon initial assessment

His blood pressure was 103/67 mmHg and heart rate 91 beats per minutes.His oxygen saturation was 98% on room air.He had thin built with the body weight of 48 kg.There were no cervical or supraclavicular nodes palpable.Abdomen was soft and non-tender.

Laboratory examinations

Hemoglobin level was 13.2 g/dL.Creatinine was 0.86 mg/dL with creatinine clearance of 57 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Endoscopic and imaging examinations

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an esophageal tumor with its proximal margin at 18 cm from incisors and biopsy showing SCC(Figure 1A).Positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET-CT)reported an intensely fluorodeoxyglucose-avid esophageal mass and peri-esophageal nodes,without evidence of distant metastases(Figure 2A).Bronchoscopy showed a 4 mm-length extrinsic compression of the upper trachea with no invasion seen(Figure 1B).

MULTIDISCIPLINARY EXPERT CONSULTATION

Upper gastrointestinal surgeon

The tumor was deemed unresectable as s urgery may result in functional deficits and impairment of quality of life due to the tumor location.

Medical oncology

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy was recommended.The proposed chemotherapeutic regimen was weekly carboplatin(area under curve 2 mg/mL per minute)and paclitaxel(50 mg/m2of body surface area)doublet combination.

Radiation oncology

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy was recommended.Image-guided IMRT to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was offered.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The final diagnosis of the present case was unresectable T4N1M0 cervical esophageal SCC.

TREATMENT

He was started on image-guided IMRT to a planned dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions(Figures 2B and 3A-C),with concurrent weekly carboplatin(area under curve 2 mg/mL per minute)and paclitaxel(50 mg/m2of body surface area).After 1 wk of treatment,he developed cough when swallowing.Cone-beam CT(Figure 2C)demonstrated a TEF confirmed with endoscopy(Figure 1C).Esophageal stenting was explored but deemed technically not feasible due to the close proximity to the upper esophageal sphincter,limiting the ability for safe esophageal stenting.Tracheal stent insertion was attempted twice.Ultimately a tracheal stent(Ultraflex 20 mm×60 mm)was inserted and sited 4 cm below the vocal cords,covering the fistula on the third attempt.

After 6 wk of treatment break,the patient resumed chemoradiotherapy after tracheal stenting was performed successfully.Restaging PET/CT prior to chemoradiotherapy confirmed no evidence of new disease.A percutaneous radiologically inserted gastrostomy(PRG)tube was inserted for nutrition support during this interim period while waiting for esophageal fistula to improve with time following the treatment.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)was not preferred because the tube will go through the esophageal cancer during the procedure with a risk of seeding at PEG stoma.Instead,a PRG was done to mitigate this risk.In addition to the radiation dose of 16.2 Gy delivered initially,he received another 45 Gy in 25 fractions uneventfully(Figure 2D).

Figure 1 Endoscopic and imaging examinations.A and B:Esophageal tumor on esophagogastroduodenocopy(A)and airway evaluation on bronchoscopy(B)where an extrinsic compression of trachea(arrow)was observed at initial diagnosis;C:A tracheoesophageal fistula(arrow)seen on esophagogastroduodenocopy after first week of chemoradiotherapy;D:Tracheal stent in place on bronchoscopy at 6-mo post-chemoradiotherapy;E:Complete tumor response with closure of fistula(arrow)evident on esophagogastroduodenocopy at 6-mo post-chemoradiotherapy.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Three months after completion of chemoradiotherapy,he developed an esophageal stricture that required esophageal stenting and dilatation.Complete response of esophageal cancer and closure of TEF was seen on post-treatment endoscopy and CT(Figures 1D,E and 2E,F).The patient remains cancer-free at two year on follow-up.The timeline of the events is summarized in Figure 4.

DISCUSSION

We presented a case of successful treatment of unresectable T4N1M0 cervical esophageal SCC complicated by a TEF during chemoradiotherapy,after which clinical complete response was achieved with the closure of TEF after treatment with modern image-guided IMRT and concurrent carboplatin-paclitaxel as a novel chemotherapeutic regimen.Image guidance played an important role in this case as it permitted early detection of TEF and subsequent close monitoring of TEF-associated complications throughout the treatment course.

T4 esophageal cancer associated with fistula formation often presents a clinical therapeutic dilemma.Most clinicians tend to propose palliative rather than curative intent treatment.As a result of the absence of high-quality evidence,there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy of T4 esophageal cancer complicated by a fistula.Despite lacking randomized controlled trials,neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy are the two commonly practiced treatment approaches.Two prospective phase 2 studies supported the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with T4 esophageal cancer,with reported 1-year overall survival of 68% to 83%,and pathological complete response rate of 8% to 20% and R0 resection rate of 92% to 95%[7,8].Whereas another two prospective trials and retrospective studies examining the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy using 5-Fluorouracil(5FU)-cisplatin doublet in patients with T4 disease or unresectable regional nodal metastases reported 1-year OS ranging between 30% and 56%[5,6,9,10].Recently,the introduction of 5FUcisplatin-docetaxel triplet in phase 2 trials has shown further improvement in 1-year OS to 66%-78%[4,11].

Given the tumor location in the cervical esophagus in this case,it was deemed unresectable due to the potential functional deficits and impairment in quality of life.Hence definitive chemoradiotherapy approach was recommended.Instead of the conventional 5FU-cisplatin combination,weekly carboplatin(area under curve 2 mg/mL per minute)and paclitaxel(50 mg/m2of body surface area)was chosen for this patient due to its comparably tolerable side-effect profile.The efficacy basis of this chemotherapy regimen was extrapolated from the landmark CROSS trial which reported a survival benefit for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by definitive surgery with an impressive pathological complete response rate of 49% in the patients of SCC histology subtype in patients with locally-advanced cancer of esophagus or esophagogastric junction[12].Of note,CROSS trial has excluded T4 tumors.In light of the excellent treatment response in this patient,weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel which has not been evaluated in the previous studies on T4 esophageal cancer should be considered as a potential novel chemotherapeutic regimen as part of definitive chemoradiotherapy treatment in this population.

The utilization of modern radiation techniques has a clear role in improving the therapeutic ratio in cancer treatment.For instance,the implementation of IMRT in the treatment of esophageal cancers has allowed for greater dose conformality to the target volumes and avoidance of organs at risk such as the spinal cord,lungs and heart.In addition,image guided radiation therapy has allowed for precise target localization during the delivery of radiation.For patients with radiosensitive histology like SCC treated with this potentially effective chemotherapy regimen where excellent tumor response is anticipated,image-guided radiation therapy should be considered as an important adjunct to monitor for any radiologically detectable complications,such as fistula formation.

Malignant TEF is an undesirable complication and usually require endoscopic interventions.Literature suggests that stenting both trachea and esophagus conferred superior outcomes including better quality of life and possibly survival benefit compared to stenting either trachea or esophagus alone[13-16].However,the role of double stenting(concomitant esophageal and tracheal stents)remains questionable.The suitability of esophageal and/or tracheal stenting should be evaluated by experienced endoscopists.

Figure 2 Radiographic findings of the tumor.A:Positron emission tomography-computed tomography(CT)at initial diagnosis;B-D:Cone-beam CT on first fraction(B),fifth fraction where tumor response was evident with the development of tracheoesophageal fistula(arrow)(C),and final fraction of radiotherapy when fistula was closed(D);E:Contrasted CT imaging at 6-mo post-chemoradiotherapy showing complete response;F:Contrasted CT imaging at 15-mo post-chemoradiotherapy showing no recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion,a successful curative treatment of esophageal cancer complicated by a TEF necessitates a multidisciplinary approach with various supportive interventions.While the optimal treatment regimen is not well-established,definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy using image-guided IMRT and novel carboplatin-paclitaxel is an effective treatment option.

Figure 3 Radiation plan using intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique.A:Axial view;B:Coronal view;and C:Sagittal view.

Figure 4 Timeline of events.IMRT:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy.