陳炳星



【摘要】 目的:研究可視喉鏡對急診氣管插管患者局部刺激及機體應激的控制作用。方法:選取2017年10月-2018年12月本院收治的78例急診氣管插管患者為研究對象。將其根據干預方式的不同分為常規喉鏡組(對照組)39例和可視喉鏡組(觀察組)39例。比較兩組插管時間、一次插管成功率、喉鏡顯露分級、喉痙攣發生率、不同時間的應激激素及血流動力學指標。結果:觀察組插管時間短于對照組,一次插管成功率高于對照組,喉痙攣發生率低于對照組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組喉鏡顯露分級構成顯著優于對照組(P<0.05)。插管后1、5 min,觀察組應激激素、血流動力學指標均低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論:可視喉鏡對急診氣管插管患者局部刺激及機體應激的控制作用較好,在急診氣管插管患者中的應用價值較高。
【關鍵詞】 可視喉鏡 急診 氣管插管 局部刺激 機體應激
[Abstract] Objective: To study the control effect of visual laryngoscope on local stimulation and body stress in patients with emergency endotracheal intubation. Method: A total of 78 patients with emergency endotracheal intubation admitted to our hospital from October 2017 to December 2018 were selected as the study subjects. According to the different intervention methods, they were divided into conventional laryngoscope group (the control group ) 39 cases and visual laryngoscope group (the observation group) 39 cases. The time of intubation, success rate of primary intubation, laryngoscope exposure stage, incidence of laryngospasm, stress hormones and hemodynamic indexes at different times were compared between the two groups. Result: The intubation time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, the success rate of primary intubation was higher than that of the control group, the incidence of laryngospasm was lower than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The laryngoscope exposure stage compositions of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05). 1 and 5 min after intubation, the stress hormones and hemodynamic indexes in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Visual laryngoscope can control local stimulation and body stress in patients with emergency endotracheal intubation, and its application value in patients with emergency endotracheal intubation is high.
[Key words] Visual laryngoscope Emergency Endotracheal intubation Local stimulation Body stressFirst-authors address: Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Chinadoi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2020.18.033
氣管插管的時效性要求較高,而氣管插管過程中面臨的難點與重點是機體不良應激的控制,除咽喉部位的局部刺激外,機體整體應激也是控制與評估的重點。可視喉鏡是在可視條件下進行氣管插管的方式,其更有利于操作的順利進行[1-2]。臨床中與急診氣管插管相關的研究中,關于可視喉鏡的應用是近年來的研究熱點[3],但是關于其對患者局部刺激及機體應激的細致影響作用存在較大欠缺。因此,本研究就可視喉鏡對急診氣管插管患者局部刺激及機體應激的控制作用進行觀察與探究,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料 選取2017年10月-2018年12月本院收治的78例急診氣管插管患者為研究對象。納入標準:(1)年齡20~75歲;(2)急診患者;(3)符合氣管插管指征。排除標準:(1)喉頭嚴重水腫;(2)喉頭急性炎癥;(3)認知障礙;(4)呼吸道感染;(5)頸椎病變。將其根據干預方式的不同分為常規喉鏡組(對照組)39例和可視喉鏡組(觀察組)39例。該研究已經醫院倫理學委員會批準。
[7] Xu M,Li X X,Guo X Y,et al.Shikani Optical Stylet versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cervical Spondylosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2017,130(3):297-302.
[8] Smereka J,Madziala M,Dunder D,et al.Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial[J].Eur J Pediatr,2019,178(6):937-945.
[9]劉春紅,羅一凡,王鵬,等.可視喉鏡、可視硬性光棒及普通喉鏡在鼾癥患者氣管插管中的應用效果比較[J].廣西醫科大學學報,2019,36(5):830-833.
[10]張培紅,宋春紅.纖維支氣管鏡聯合可視喉鏡在急診口底間隙感染患者麻醉氣管插管中的應用價值[J].上海醫學,2019,42(2):84-87.
[11]張麗媛,叢旭暉,孫銘陽,等.可視喉鏡與直接喉鏡在雙腔支氣管插管中的應用[J].臨床麻醉學雜志,2018,34(1):25-28.
[12]趙基鵬,熊添,樊宏,等.HC可視喉鏡與Macintosh喉鏡在VivaSight雙腔支氣管插管中的比較[J].中國醫師雜志,2018,20(10):1579-1581.
[13]甄漢華,黃美順,鄧艷云,等.纖支鏡引導下經鼻氣管插管與經口可視喉鏡下氣管插管的比較[J].深圳中西醫結合雜志,2018,28(6):24-26.
[14]朱玉梅,夏晶,湯海俊,等.直接喉鏡、光棒和視可尼可視喉鏡在老年患者氣管插管中的應用比較[J].臨床麻醉學雜志,2018,34(4):395-396.
[15]黃愛知,張靜,劉芳.可視喉鏡下插胃管在重癥監護病房氣管插管患者中的應用效果[J].廣西醫學,2018,40(21):2625-2627.
[16]吳卓熙,楊保仲.普通喉鏡、可視喉鏡和便攜視頻在外科手術麻醉氣管插管中的應用比較[J].中國醫學創新,2016,13(9):26-29.
[17]陳平,方克.可視喉鏡在院前急救氣管插管術中的應用[J].現代實用醫學,2017,29(3):363-364.
[18]梁俊雄,黃錦聯,張偉良,等.HC可視喉鏡在院外急救困難氣道氣管插管中的臨床應用研究[J].現代中西醫結合雜志,2017,26(16):1802-1804.
[19]林思銘.Glidescope可視喉鏡與普通喉鏡在急診危重癥氣管插管中應用效果比較[J].黑龍江醫藥,2017,30(2):447-449.
[20]毛志浩,凌桂強.可視喉鏡與直接喉鏡在頸椎損傷患者急診插管中的應用效果比較[J].中國基層醫藥,2017,24(3):454-456.
[21]沈丹,劉春蘭,儲勤軍.可視喉鏡在急診氣管插管術中的臨床應用價值及安全性探析[J].河南醫學研究,2017,26(12):2179-2180.
[22]沈黎紅,趙斌江,關雷,等.Shikani可視喉鏡與McCoy喉鏡用于老年患者全身麻醉氣管插管的比較研究[J].中國內鏡雜志,2017,23(3):20-24.
(收稿日期:2019-11-21) (本文編輯:姬思雨)