999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide:A report of two cases

2019-04-22 06:27:44JingSuLiJunZhengXinQuanLiu
World Journal of Clinical Cases 2019年22期

Jing Su, Li-Jun Zheng, Xin-Quan Liu

Jing Su, Xin-Quan Liu, Department of Ophthalmology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China

Li-Jun Zheng, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China

Abstract

Key words: Crystalline lens; Intravitreal injection; Triamcinolone acetonide; Iatrogenic injury; Case report

INTRODUCTION

Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a type of glucocorticoid with long-lasting effects,which can inhibit cellular immunity, reduce inflammation and maintain the permeability of blood capillaries.It can also maintain the blood-retina barrier, limit fibrin exudation and inhibit the angiogenesis growth factor to prevent the formation of new blood vessels.Based on these features, TA is administered by intravitreal injection to treat vitreoretinal diseases at a local therapeutic and sustainable concentration.Although injection of Ozurdex has become the main treatment for macular edema in recent years[1], TA injection is an effective and inexpensive treatment and is still used in developing countries or regions.Recent research has indicated that intravitreal injection of TA is an efficient approach in the treatment of a variety of proliferative, edematous, neovascular and inflammatory ocular disorders[2-4].Despite the efficacy of intravitreal TA injection, attention should be paid to its associated complications.These complications may be caused by the injection procedure or the side-effects of the corticosteroid.Long-term complications, such as cataract development and secondary glaucoma especially in the case of repeated injection, are attributed to the side effects of the corticosteroid.Immediate complications, such as conjunctival hemorrhage, retinal pigment epithelium tears,retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage and endophthalmitis, are due to the injection procedure.Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury is a rare complication of intravitreal TA injection, which occurs due to contact or penetration of the lens by the needle tip.We report two cases of iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of TA.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

Case 1:A 62-year-old woman with a 5 mo history of central retinal vein occlusion in the right eye complained of severe vision impairment.

Case 2:A 65-year-old man with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion in his right eye for 2 mo complained of visual deformity.

History of present illness

In Case 1, the patient had received retinal photocoagulation therapy and treatment with oral Chinese medicine, but her condition did not improve.In Case 2, the patient experienced worsening visual disturbance for two weeks although he had received retinal photocoagulation therapy.

History of past illness

Both patients had no remarkable history of illness.

Physical examination

Both patients had hyperopia.In Case 1, the eye axis was 22.15 mm and the spherical equivalent was 1.50 D.Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/50 and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was 18 mmHg before injection.In Case 2, the eye axis was 21.68 mm and the spherical equivalent was 2.25 D.His BCVA was 20/100 and the IOP was 15 mmHg.Both patients had a shallow anterior chamber and the crystal lens was transparent on the whole under the slit lamp.

Imaging examinations

In Case 1, optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed persistent cystoid macular and optic nerve edema (Figure 1A).In Case 2, OCT revealed cystoid macular edema and hemorrhage in the subtemporal quadrant of the retina.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion.

TREATMENT

In China, anti-vascular therapy for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion is not included in medical insurance.In view of the patients’ economic status and urgent desire for treatment, we treated the patients with intravitreal TA injection after informed consent related to treatment risk and associated complications was obtained.Briefly, 0.1 mL/4 mg TA was intravitreally injected under surface anesthesia into the superior temporal quadrant, 3.5 mm from the limbus of the cornea.All intravitreal injections were performed by the same right-handed resident.

In Case 1, on the first day after TA injection, slit lamp examination showed that the suspended TA particles formed a villiform opacity behind the posterior capsule.However, the lens cortex and core remained transparent (Figure 2A).There seemed to be a visible capsular channel perforation on the posterior capsule of the lens.The patient complained of blurred vision but no other discomfort.BCVA was fingers in front of the eyes and the IOP was 19 mmHg.The fundus was not observed.Follow-up after two weeks showed that the suspended TA particles behind the posterior capsule had a tendency to be absorbed (Figure 2B).The BCVA was enhanced to 20/166 and the IOP was 20 mmHg.One month later, the TA suspension behind the posterior capsule was further absorbed and the lens cortex and core remained transparent(Figure 2C).The BCVA was 20/133 and the IOP was 21 mmHg.Fuzzy fundus was observed and macular edema was alleviated (Figure 1B).The patient was subsequently lost to follow-up as she moved to another city.Eight months after the TA injection, she visited us again.The TA in the posterior capsule was mostly absorbed, limited rice crust opacity had formed and posterior subcapsular opacification was observed.A slow progressive opacity in the lens cortex and core was found (Figure 2D).OCT examination showed that macular edema had mostly subsided, but macular epiretinal membrane had appeared (Figure 1C).BCVA was enhanced to 20/100.However, the IOP rose to 32 mmHg without inflammation of the anterior and posterior chambers.She was prescribed timolol, brimonidine and latanoprost.The IOP was controlled to 21-25 mmHg.At 9 mo after intravitreal injection of TA, cataract surgery was performed with standard phacoemulsification devices.As rupture of the posterior capsule was predicted, we prepared for anterior vitrectomy before surgery.During the operation, the anterior chamber water pressure was reduced by keeping the height of the infusion bottle low.After annular tearing of the anterior capsule, only hydrodelineation was performed to prevent rupture of the posterior capsule or enlargement of the original tear.The nucleus and cortex were easily aspirated by an irrigation-aspiration probe with a low flow parameter due to the slight cataract.Posterior capsule holes were found during the process of removing the residual cortex and polishing the posterior capsule membrane.We were not sure whether the capsular tear was caused by the cataract surgery or needle puncture in the earlier intravitreal injection.In order to prevent further enlargement of the hole,polishing and irrigation-aspiration were stopped.This resulted in some cortical residues on the peripheral cortex and the posterior capsular surface.Fortunately, due to mild liquefaction of the vitreous body, vitreous exfoliation was inconspicuous despite rupture of the posterior capsule.We did not perform anterior vitrectomy and implanted the intraocular lens (IOL) directly into the ciliary sulcus.On the second day after surgery, there was no significant residual cortex in the pupil area, which did not affect the optic axis area.

Figure 1 Case 1 optical coherence tomography imaging examinations.

In Case 2, on the first day after TA injection, the BCVA was 20/200 and the IOP was 42 mmHg.Lens opacity and expansion was observed under the slit lamp (Figure 3C).The image was blurred due to corneal edema.The IOP could not be controlled by anti-glaucoma medications in the following weeks.One week after injection, the patient underwent cataract surgery.The detailed procedure was the same as that in Case 1.The nucleus and cortex were removed by irrigation-aspiration using low flow parameters.A posterior capsule tear secondary to the injection was observed.Anterior vitrectomy was not performed as there was no obvious vitreous overflow.The IOL was then placed in the sulcus.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

In Case 1, one week after surgery, the posterior capsule had partial opacity in the upper quadrant of the nose, but no opacity in the pupil area (Figure 2E).The patient’s BCVA increased to 20/33 and IOP was 15 mmHg without anti-glaucoma medications.Despite her improved eyesight, the patient still complained of sight deformation.

In Case 2, four weeks after surgery, BCVA was 20/50, and IOP was 16 mmHg without anti-glaucoma medications.Remnants of the lens cortex were found in the temporal quadrant (Figure 3D).Although not all the drugs were injected into the vitreous cavity, the macular edema partially subsided (Figure 3B).

Figure 2 Case 1 slit lamp examinations.

Regular follow-up visits were performed in both cases and no further complications were found.Both patients were satisfied with the final outcome and visual acuity.

Figure 3 Case 2 optical coherence tomography imaging examinations and slit lamp examinations.

DISCUSSION

Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury due to needle tip contact or penetration is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.006%[5].Only 4 cases have been reported.These four cases were all caused by intravitreal injection of dexamethasone into the crystalline lens[6-8].In recent years, with the increase in Ozurdex injections, cases of iatrogenic lens injury have increased[9-11].Due to the special suspending property of TA, the complication caused by TA implanted into the crystalline lens is unique.In our cases, the crystalline lens was injured, but cataract progression was not observed over the entire follow-up period.It was presumed that a small lens wound could heal spontaneously due to proliferation of the subcapsular epithelium which would seal the wound before the intraventricular passage of ions and fluid, leading to cataract progression[12].The cataract remained stable in the superior-temporal quadrant without progress in Case 2.However, since we only monitored the patient for one week, a conclusion could not be drawn.As TA is composed of white suspended particles, feather-like turbidity formed, blocking the line of sight in Case 1 without cataract formation when TA was injected into the posterior capsule of the lens.Although not all TA injected into the posterior capsule of the lens was distributed in the vitreous cavity, it still played a role in the treatment of macular edema in Case 1.Although macular edema subsided,formation of the macular epiretinal membrane is rare.The reason for this requires further investigation.

In Case 1, the increase in IOP may be related to suspended TA particles which clogged the trabecular meshwork, which in turn was due to degeneration of the trabecular meshwork caused by steroid hormones.In Case 2, the increase in IOP was related to expansion of the lens caused by drug injection into the crystalline body.The experiences drawn from these two cases are as follows:

The injection site and angle

The site and the angle of the injection needle are important and are the main cause of lens injury.The needle used in intravitreal injection should puncture the pars plana corporis ciliaris, which is generally 3.5 mm-4 mm posterior to the limbus.In our two cases, we chose 3.5 mm using a caliper to measure from the limbus.We ignored the ocular axial length change in these cases.In Case 1, the eye axis was 22.15 mm, and in Case 2, the eye axis was 21.68 mm.Both cases had mild hyperopia with a short axial length.If the needle entry was performed according to the conventional 3.5 mm posterior to the limbus in short axial eyes, it would result in injection close to the ciliary body.On the one hand, injection close to the ciliary body would narrow the needle’s movable range and the needle could easily touch the lens.On the other hand,it might stimulate the ciliary body to cause pain, which will cause sudden movement of the operated eye, increase the difficulty of the operation and the risk of injury to adjacent structures.Therefore, the puncture site for intravitreal injection should be 4 mm posterior to the limbus, especially in hyperopia eyes.

The insert angle of the needle should be oblique toward the center of the optic nerve.It has been demonstrated that the angle between the posterior capsule of the crystalline lens and the retinal surface is 90°[5].During surgery, in order to facilitate manipulation in the superior temporal quadrant, we asked the patient to look at his inferonasal quadrant during the operation.In such a position, the needling should be done perpendicular to the eyeball.If the needle is still at a fairly steep angle of less than 45°, it is more likely to damage the lens.Thus, the needle should be moved toward the optic nerve with a 90° angle after piercing the sclera.

Anesthesia

We used surface anesthesia with alcaine eye drops.For some sensitive patients, this method is insufficient.Pain or tension during the operation may cause the patient to move their head or eyeball suddenly and results in lens injury.It is noteworthy that we used cotton swabs to displace the loose conjunctiva during the operation, and this may have led to a shift in the injection site location.

Diameter of the needle

The recommended diameter of the needle is gauge 27 to reduce the risk of injury to ocular structures and wound leakage.In our procedure, we used 26 gauge needles.The thicker the needle, the greater the contact with the sclera, and greater strength for the injection is needed[13].This caused movement of the eyeball due to local pain, and greater pressure resulted in a shorter distance between the needle and the lens.

CONCLUSION

Although intravitreal injection is a simple technique, it still requires a learning curve especially for young residents.Accurate selection of needle entry points and angles,appropriate anesthesia, stable head fixation, small-size injection needles and a comprehensive understanding of the patient’s condition before surgery are important to avoid complications.A careful preoperative evaluation and well-prepared cataract surgery can alleviate anatomical and functional damage.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 91福利国产成人精品导航| 91在线一9|永久视频在线| 亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线| 91免费精品国偷自产在线在线| 亚洲午夜综合网| 亚洲天堂视频在线播放| 欧美成人一区午夜福利在线| 亚洲午夜福利精品无码| 中文字幕无码中文字幕有码在线| 91精品国产自产91精品资源| 亚洲精品黄| 成人福利在线免费观看| 国产三区二区| 久久综合色视频| 国产毛片片精品天天看视频| 亚洲人免费视频| 日韩a级片视频| 欧美全免费aaaaaa特黄在线| 色网站在线免费观看| 狠狠色婷婷丁香综合久久韩国| 久久精品国产免费观看频道| 99热在线只有精品| 国产18在线| 欧美色视频在线| 五月天在线网站| 中国一级毛片免费观看| 久久久噜噜噜| 亚洲天堂日韩在线| 亚洲精品无码成人片在线观看| 狠狠色综合网| 国产va视频| 国产乱人伦AV在线A| 欧美日本在线观看| 国产电话自拍伊人| 精品超清无码视频在线观看| 免费国产在线精品一区| 毛片视频网| 亚洲天堂视频在线观看免费| AV天堂资源福利在线观看| av大片在线无码免费| 成人福利一区二区视频在线| 女人18毛片一级毛片在线 | 在线免费无码视频| 国内精品伊人久久久久7777人| 亚洲欧美另类视频| 一级毛片不卡片免费观看| 欧美午夜一区| 婷婷激情五月网| 日韩无码视频播放| 美女无遮挡免费视频网站| 成人精品视频一区二区在线| 99这里只有精品免费视频| 国产精品视频999| 亚洲精品欧美日本中文字幕| 国产一区二区网站| 国产精品一区二区在线播放| 国产一区二区三区免费观看| 色婷婷天天综合在线| 亚洲成年网站在线观看| 国产精品手机在线播放| 试看120秒男女啪啪免费| 国产第二十一页| 久久免费观看视频| 久久网欧美| h网址在线观看| 视频二区国产精品职场同事| 免费观看国产小粉嫩喷水| 中文字幕资源站| 欧美在线黄| 久草视频中文| 奇米影视狠狠精品7777| 国产剧情一区二区| 亚洲成年人网| 精品视频一区在线观看| 久久婷婷五月综合色一区二区| 亚洲 成人国产| 欧美一级夜夜爽www| 国产成人精品亚洲77美色| 亚洲中字无码AV电影在线观看| 亚洲精品无码抽插日韩| 99热这里只有精品国产99| 成人在线观看一区|