水溶液中碳酸鈾?；衔锏碾娮咏Y構

辜家芳 陸春海 陳文凱,* 陳 勇 許 可 黃 昕 章永凡

(1福州大學化學系,福州350108;2成都理工大學核技術與自動化工程學院,成都610059)

水溶液中碳酸鈾?；衔锏碾娮咏Y構

辜家芳1陸春海2陳文凱1,*陳 勇1許 可1黃 昕1章永凡1

(1福州大學化學系,福州350108;2成都理工大學核技術與自動化工程學院,成都610059)

應用相對論密度泛函理論系統(tǒng)研究了水溶液中非水合化和水合化碳酸鈾?；衔顲n/m(其中n和m分別為結構中碳酸配體和水配體的個數)的結構.溶劑效應采用類導體屏蔽模型(COSMO),并采用零級規(guī)整近似(ZORA)方法考慮標量相對論效應和旋-軌耦合相對論效應.電子躍遷采用包含旋-軌耦合相對論效應的含時密度泛函理論并在相關交換勢中采用軌道勢能統(tǒng)計平均(SAOP)做近似計算.結果表明碳酸配體對配合物結構和電子躍遷有很大的影響.C3/0配合物的穩(wěn)定性可歸于5f軌道參與了高占據軌道的成鍵作用.增加碳酸鹽配體導致最大波長的藍移,并在近可見光區(qū)域出現高強度的吸收.

鈾酰;UV-Vis;溶劑效應;含時密度泛函理論;旋-軌耦合相對論效應

1 Introduction

The uranyl ion is easy to interact with carbonate ligands to form complexesand plays an important role in migration from a nuclear waste repository or in ac-cidental site contamination in natural water.Hence,to understand the properties of the uranyl carbonate complexes in environment is of great importance for scientific interest.Nguyen-Trung3and McGlynn4et al.have made experimental studies on the frequencies of O＝U＝O vibrations in uranyl ion with various inorganic and organic ligands.de Jong et al.5have theoretically reported the properties of geometries and frequencies on monomer complexes(n=1-3)and trimer complexesusing local density functional theory in gaseous phase with the program of NWChem.Our previous study6by Gaussian 03 program established linear correlations between the frequency of O＝U＝O systematical vibration and the number of different ligands in gaseous and aqueous phases. And some other spectroscopic techniques,such as X-ray diffraction,nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy(NMR),and extended X-ray absorption fine structure(EXAFS),have been employed for uranyl carbonate studies.7,8Some reviews have summarized recent advances in computational actinide chemistry.9-12UV-Vis spectra of uranyl(VI)carbonate complexes have been obtained in experiments,13,14but few studies were reported from the theoretical perspective.Su et al.9,15have calculated the luminescence properties of uranyl-glycine-water complexes in solution with the statistically averaged orbital potentials (SAOP)employed in the spin-orbit coupling time-dependent density functional theory(SO-TD-DFT)calculations.And for other actinide elements,the spectrum studies in theory and experiment were also limited.16To explain the absorption or emission spectra of actinide complexes is important for environmental detections.

As seen from above survey,there is much experimental and theoretical interest in uranyl carbonate complexes.Absorption spectroscopy is a very important tool for analyzing chemical systems,but the interpretation of electronic spectra in terms of molecular structures remains challenges for experiments.In this paper,solvent effects on geometries of non-hydrated and hydrated structures of uranyl carbonate complexes were considered to predict characteristic absorption band of uranyl complexes in aqueous phase.

2 Calculation details

It is necessary to include relativistic effects on uranium included system.There are two general classes of relativistic effects that are clearly summarized as scalar relativistic and spinorbit coupling relativistic by Kaltsoyannis et al.17The scalar relativistic method is sufficient for ground state?s properties of actinide systems,including molecular geometries and vibration frequencies.5,15,17However,the spin-orbit coupling relativistic methods are demanded to be included in the calculation of excited states properties especially optical excitation energies.

It is advised to obtain results by using gradient-correction DFT functional with small-core relativistic effective core potential(RECP)in the benchmark for approximate calculations on bare uranyl ion by de Jong et al.18We performed the optimizations for ground state structures on the Amsterdam Density Functional Code(ADF2010.01).19-21The corresponding approximation methods obtained reliable results on uranyl glycine complexes by Su et al.15Hence,we used the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof(PBE)exchange-correlation functional22and uncontracted Slater basis sets of triple-ζ plus one polarization(TZP) quality for the U atom and sets of double-ζ plus one polarization(DZP)quality for the C and O atoms from ADF basis library.23Small frozen atomic core approximation was applied to C,O with[1s2]and to U with[1s2-5d10].The zeroth-order regular approximation(ZORA)was used to account for scalar relativistic effects.24-26Solvent effects which were estimated by the conductor-like screening model(COSMO)used the solvent accessible surface(SAS).27,28And the default water dielectric constant(ε)is 78.4 for aqueous phase calculations.

Electronic transitions by the time-dependent density functional theory(TD-DFT)29calculations based on ground state of uranyl complexes were performed.We examined the transitions from the ground state to the excited states.And the spinorbit coupling was included in excitation energies by the relativistic two-component ZORA formalism.24-26The statistically averaged orbital potentials(SAOP)15,30were employed in the TD-DFT calculations.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Bond distance

Geometries of uranyl carbonate complexes have become great interesting for theoretical and experimental chemists. From previous theoretical studies,5,31the calculated bond lengths for uranyl tri-carbonate anions are in accordance with experimental results8,32(Table 1).The use of COSMO improves the value of R(U－Ocarbonate)in structures at the PBE and PW91 levels.Although addition of diffused functions to U at the LDA

3level leads to decrease of U＝O bond length,the method is difficult in converging.5The R(U－Ocarbonate)at the PBE/ZORA level is close to experimental data in aqueous phase8as compared to those with the PW91 and LDA methods.Hence,we use the PBE/ZORA method with the the approximations of successive uranyl carbonate complexes.

Table 1 Comparison of calculated and experimental bond lengths for UO2(CO3)4-

Fig.1 Stable structures of non-hydrated(C1/0,C2/0,C3/0)and hydrated(C1/3,C2/1,C2/2)uranyl carbonate complexes

The coordination number(CN)in the equator of the linear UO2unit for stable uranyl complexes is 5.15,33,34When CNs of uranyl carbonate complexes are 2 or 4,water molecule could be added to the equator to form more stable structures.Here we label the non-hydrated form and hydrated form with Cn/m (n and m are the numbers of carbonate and water ligands in uranyl complexes,respectively).The non-hydrated(C1/0,C2/0, C3/0)and hydrated(C1/3,C2/1,C2/2)structures of uranyl complexes are shown in Fig.1.In order to estimate the ligand effects on geometry and electronic structures of uranyl complexes,PBE/ZORA method is employed to optimize both forms.The bond lengths are listed in Table 2.

The trend in the bond distances of non-hydrated structures is substantially the same as those observed in experimental and theoretical data.5By adding carbonate ligand in the equator of the linear UO2unit,the U＝O and U－Oeqare elongated.It seems that ligands competing effects of carbonate ions have weakened the bonds of U＝O and uranium-carbonate coordination.The R(U＝O)of the successive uranyl carbonate complexes ranges from 0.1798 to 0.1852 nm in gaseous phase and 0.1802 to 0.1853 nm in aqueous phase.R(U＝O)of C1/0 (UO2CO3)is widely discussed in experiments.35-38It arrived at 0.193 nm by Christ et al.,35(0.167±0.009)nm by Cromer and Harper,36and 0.174 nm by Finch et al.37Recently,Matar38has carried out a DFT study on lattice anisotropy,electronic and chemical geometry of C1/0,and the calculated R(U＝O)value is 0.179 nm in the uranyl carbonate crystal.And we favor the results of longer U＝O of C1/0 as those determined by theoretical methods.Solvent effects of water elongate the U＝O in C1/ 0 as compared with that in gaseous phase.But for high coordination complexes of C2/0 and C3/0(uranyl di-,tri-carbonate complexes),similar R(U＝O)values are obtained in gaseous and aqueous phases.The carbonate ion performs a great geometry deformation in successive uranyl carbonate complexes. The differences between R(C＝O)and R(C－O)are great in the complexes which contain one or two uranium-carbonate coordination bonds,but are tiny in the complex with three uranium-carbonate coordination bonds.The hydrated water elongates U＝O of C1/3 as compared with that in C1/0.And in C2/ 0,C2/1,and C2/2,similar bond lengths in gaseous and aqueous phases again illustrate the little effect by solvent on high uranium-carbonate coordination complexes.The fact that UOwateris much longer than U－Ocarbonateindicates that hydrated water may interact with uranyl ion weakly.

3.2 Binding energy

The corresponding binding energies15of the Cn/m complexes defined by energy differences between the whole complex and its components are based on the following formula:

Cn/m refers to the non-hydrated and hydrated structures of ura-nyl complexes.And C(n-1)/m or Cn/(m-1)refers to the structures removing one carbonate ion or one water molecule from Cn/m.Carbonate,water,and uranyl are the components of a whole complex.The E refers to energy with the inclusion of spin orbit coupling relativistic effects in gaseous or aqueous phase.And all components?energies for the whole complex include the basis set superposition error(BSSE)correction.

Table 2 Bond distances for uranyl carbonates in gaseous and aqueous phases

Table 3 Binding energies for uranyl carbonates in gaseous and aqueous phase

The parameter Ebcarbonate(Table 3)introduced by adding hydrated water in structures indicates that the bond of uraniumcarbonate coordination is strengthened in uranyl hydrated structures.And the small value of Ebwaterillustrates that uranium-water coordination is far weaker.In aqueous phase,the total binding energyof C3/0 is-1495.1 kJ·mol-1and the negative value means that the formation of C3/0is exothermic.The total binding energies show that C2/2 and C3/0 are the most stable carbonate complexes in gaseous and aqueous phases,respectively. These results agree with stability constants of uranyl carbonate in experiments.13,14,39In gaseous phase,the binding energy ofwith positive value means the formation of C3/0 from reactions between carbonate ion and C2/0 is endothermic by 522.1 kJ·mol-1.In Table 3,although hydrated water seems to increase the total binding energies of uranyl carbonate complexes,ligands competing effects could decrease the energies to separate one carbonate ion from C1/3,C2/1,and C2/2.The bond of uranium-water coordination tends to be intensified in aqueous phase as the binding energies of U－Owaterare higher than those in gaseous phase(Table 3).

3.3 Molecular orbital

Fig.2 Molecular orbital diagrams of hydrated uranyl complex C1/3H and L are short for the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied orbitals, respectively.The same abbreviation scheme is applied from Fig.3 to Fig.6.

Fig.3 Isosurfaces(Ψ=±0.03 a.u.)of the corresponding frontier orbitals(H,H-1,L,L+2)in C1/3 complex

Molecular orbital(MO)diagrams and frontier orbitals of C1/ 3 are displayed in Fig.2 and Fig.3,respectively.In uranyl,the highest occupied MOs(HOMOs)3σg,3σu,1πg,and 2πuare most components of 2p shell centered on oxygen atoms,while the lowest unoccupied MOs(LUMOs)1Фu,1δu,and 3πualmost are the components of 5f shell centered on uranium atom.The HOMOs of C1/3 consist of 2p components from carbonate ligand and the LUMOs are mainly uranium 5f unoccupied orbital as the fragments interactions illustrated in Fig.2.Here we find that the H-1 orbital comes from the interactions of 3σuorbital of uranyl and 2p orbital of carbonate.And the HOMOs, 3σg,1πg,and 2πuof uranyl come to interact with 2p components of water ligands to form orbital of uranyl complex in low energy level.The corresponding orbitals shown in Fig.3 are in accordance to the molecular orbitals interactions.Hence,the more carbonate ligands come to ligate with uranyl ion,the more 2p components of carbonate based orbital could insert in the high occupied energy level.That is also true in molecular orbital diagrams of C2/2 and C3/0 shown in Fig.4 and Fig.5. However,the main difference compared to C1/3 complex is that the components of 5f shell begin to take part in bonding interactions in C2/2 and C3/0.The bonding orbital between 5f and 2p components of C2/2 and C3/0 are showed in Fig.6.And we may attribute stability of C3/0 carbonate complex in aqueous phase to the inclusion of 5f components in high occupied orbital.

Fig.4 Molecularorbitaldiagramsof hydrated uranylcomplexC2/2

Fig.5 Molecular orbital diagrams of hydrated uranyl complex C3/0

3.4 Electronic transitions

Electronic transition calculations from PBE-ZORA by ADF program are mentioned in the detail of calculations.State splitting by the ligand field and spin-orbit coupling makes more transitions available.But symmetry in structure would restrict the transitions as selection rule only allows transitions with parity changes.

The experimental characteristic absorption band was at 414 nm for uranyl species.40The absorption band of the uranyl complexes was broad in the visible range between 520 and 370 nm by extensive spectroscopy experiments studies on uranyl carbonate complexes13,14,41,42and some other inorganic ligands.38,43-47The excitation energies above 370 nm of uranyl carbonate complexes in Table 4 are in accordance with the major characteristics observed from experiments discussed above. Just as the main assignments of excitations transitions shown in Table 4,transitions are essentially transferred from high occupied orbital to the low vacant orbital.As the molecular orbitals discussed above,the main transitions between HOMOs and LUMOs are clearly ligand-to-metal charge transfer(LMCT) with electron density essentially transferring from carbonates ligand-based 2p components towards the vacant 5f orbital of the uranium.Only a few high occupied orbitals come from the interactions of 3σuorbital of uranyl and 2p components based orbital of carbonate.When compared to the allowed transitions in C1/3,the allowed ones in C2/2 and C3/0 turn to be with a smaller number for the restriction of centro symmetry of molecule in the selection rule.The maximum of wavelengths are blue shifted for uranyl carbonate complexes C1/3 to C3/0.And relatively stronger absorptions at 420 nm in all the uranyl carbonate complexes accord with properties of material itself.But our calculations indicate that absorptions at 420 nm in C2/2 and C3/0 are far stronger than those in C1/3.Our calculated UV-Vis absorption spectra are simulated by SO-TD-DFT calculations and displayed in Fig.7.The characters of uranyl carbonate complexes on UV-Vis spectra depend on the coordinating number of carbonate ion.And the additions of ligated water in structures make UV-Vis spectra slightly red shift as compared to those in the corresponding non-hydrated structures.Uranyl carbonate C1/0 behaved differently in absorption spectrum with no major characteristics as compared to those of other uranyl carbonate species by experimental study.44And the low intensity of absorptions for C1/3 is in accordance to the results from experiments.44The UV-Vis absorption spectra observed by Gong et al.47on uranyl acetohydroxamate also show no characteristics of other uranyl complexes.The absorption intensity of uranyl carbonate complexes can be explained by the differences in molecular orbital.As we have discussed above, components of 5f shell begin to take part in bonding orbital interactions in C2/2 and C3/0.The ligand contributions of carbonate ion allow larger ligand-to-metal charge transfer(LMCT). We can find that the carbonate ligand plays an important role in electronic absorption.It indicates that the addition of carbonate ligand leads to a blue shift in the maximum wavelength and high intensity of absorption in the near visible region.

Fig.6 Isosurfaces(Ψ=±0.03 a.u.)of the bonding orbitals(H,and H-2)in C2/2 and C3/0 complexes

Table 4 Excitation energy and main assignments of spinpolarized excitations for uranyl carbonate complexes

Fig.7 Simulated UV-Vis spectra for non-hydrated(C1/0,C2/0, C3/0)and hydrated(C1/3,C2/1,C2/2)uranyl carbonate complexes as carbonate and hydrated water ligands changed from 1 to 3

4 Conclusions

It indicates that carbonate ligand plays an important role in its geometrical and electronic transitional properties.The geometries of uranyl carbonate complexes agree well with the available experimental and theoretical studies.The interpretations of the characteristics of uranyl carbonate complexes were suggested from a certain viewpoint of molecular orbital.The differences among orbital compositions show that more 2p based orbitals from carbonate ligands in the high occupied energy level are due to the addition of carbonate ligands in structures.This promotes the LMCT in the near visible region.And the adding of water in uranyl complexes makes little effect on LMCT transitions.Hence,the low intensity of absorptions at near visible region for C1/3 is attributed to the low number of carbonate ligand.

(1)Clark,D.L.;Hobart,D.E.;Neu,M.P.Chem.Rev.1995,95,25.

(2) Meinrath,G.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.1996,211,349.

(3)Nguyen-Trung,C.;Begun,G.M.;Palmer,D.A.Inorg.Chem. 1992,31,5280.

(4) McGlynn,S.P.;Smith,J.K.;Neely,W.C.J.Chem.Phys.1961, 35,105.

(5) de Jong,W.A.;Aprà,E.;Windus,T.L.;Nichols,J.A.;Harrison, R.J.;Gutowski,K.E.;Dixon,D.A.J.Phys.Chem.A 2005, 109,11568.

(6) Gu,J.F.;Lu,C.H.;Chen,W.K.;Xu,Y.;Zheng,J.D.Acta Phys.-Chim.Sin.2009,25,655. [辜家芳,陸春海,陳文凱,許 瑩,鄭金德.物理化學學報,2009,25,655.]

(7)Allen,P.G.;Bucher,J.J.;Clark,D.L.;Edelstein,N.M.; Ekberg,S.A.;Gohdes,J.W.;Hudson,E.A.;Kaltsoyannis,N.; Lukens,W.W.Inorg.Chem.1995,34,4797.

(8) Docrat,T.I.;Mosselmans,J.F.W.;Charnock,J.M.;Whiteley, M.W.;Collison,D.;Livens,F.R.;Jones,C.;Edmiston,M.J. Inorg.Chem.1999,38,1879.

(9) Su,J.;Li,J.Prog.Chem.2011,23,1329.[蘇 靜,李 雋.化學進展,2011,23,1329.]

(10) Wang,D.Q.;Gunsteren,W.F.v.Prog.Chem.2011,23,1566. [王東琪,Gunsteren,W.F.v.化學進展,2011,23,1566.]

(11) Hu,H.S.;Wu,G.S.;Li,J.J.Nucl.Radiochem.2009,31,25. [胡憾石,吳國是,李 雋.核化學與放射化學,2009,31,25.]

(12) Liu,W.J.Prog.Chem.2007,19,833.[劉文劍.化學進展, 2007,19,833.]

(13) Cinnéide,S.ó.;Scanlan,J.P.;Hynes,M.J.J.Inorg.Nucl. Chem.1975,37,1013.

(14) Scanlan,J.P.J.Inorg.Nucl.Chem.1977,39,635.

(15) Su,J.;Zhang,K.;Schwarz,W.H.E.;Li,J.Inorg.Chem.2011, 50,2082.

(16) Matsika,S.;Pitzer,R.M.;Reed,D.T.J.Phys.Chem.A 2000, 104,11983.

(17) Kaltsoyannis,N.;Hay,P.J.;Li,J.;Blaudeau,J.P.;Bursten,B. E.Theoretical Studies of the Electronic Structure of Compounds of theActinide Elements.In The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements;Morss,L.R.,Edelstein, N.M.,Fuger,J.,Eds.;Springer:Netherlands,2006;p 1893.

(18) de Jong,W.A.;Harrison,R.J.;Nichols,J.A.;Dixon,D.A. Theor.Chem.Acc.2001,107,22.

(19)ADF2010,SCM,Theoretical Chemistry;Vrije Universiteit: Amsterdam,The Netherlands;http://www.scm.com.

(20) Guerra,C.F.;Snijders,J.G.;Velde,G.T.;Baerends,E.J.Theor. Chem.Acc.1998,99,391.

(21) Velde,G.T.;Bickelhaupt,F.M.;Baerends,E.J.;Guerra,C.F.; van Gisbergen,S.J.A.;Snijders,J.G.;Ziegler,T.J.Comput. Chem.2001,22,931.

(22) Perdew,J.P.;Burke,K.;Ernzerhof,M.Phys.Rev.Lett.1996, 77,3865.

(23) van Lenthe,E.;Baerends,E.J.J.Comput.Chem.2003,24, 1142.

(24) van Lenthe,E.;Ehlers,A.E.;Baerends,E.J.J.Chem.Phys. 1999,110,8943.

(25) van Lenthe,E.;Baerends,E.J.;Snijders,J.G.J.Chem.Phys. 1994,101,9783.

(26) van Lenthe,E.;Baerends,E.J.;Snijders,J.G.J.Chem.Phys. 1993,99,4597.

(27) Lee,B.;Richards,F.M.J.Mol.Biol.1971,55,379.

(28) Richards,F.M.Annu.Rev.Biophys.Bioeng.1977,6,151.

(29) Perdew,J.P.;Ruzsinsky,A.;Tao,J.;Staroverov,V.N.;Scuseria, G.E.;Csonka,G.I.J.Chem.Phys.2005,123,062201.

(30) Schipper,P.R.T.;Gritsenko,O.V.;van Gisbergen,S.J.A.; Baerends,E.J.J.Chem.Phys.2000,112,1344.

(31) Vázquez,J.;Bo,C.;Poblet,J.M.;de Pablo,J.;Bruno,J.Inorg. Chem.2003,42,6136.

(32) Graziani,R.;Bombieri,G.;Forsellini,E.J.Chem.Soc.Dalton Trans.1972,2059.

(33) Spencer,S.;Gagliardi,L.;Handy,N.C.;Ioannou,A.G.; Skylaris,C.K.;Willetts,A.;Simper,A.M.J.Phys.Chem.A 1999,103,1831.

(34) Bardin,N.;Rubini,P.;Madic,C.Radiochim.Acta 1998,83,189.

(35) Christ,C.L.;Clark,J.R.;Evans,H.T.J.Science 1955,121, 472.

(36) Cromer,D.T.;Harper,P.E.Acta Crystallogr.1955,8,847.

(37)Finch,R.J.;Cooper,M.A.;Hawthorne,F.C.;Ewing,R.C. Can.Mineral.1999,37,929.

(38) Matar,S.F.Chem.Phys.2010,372,46.

(39) Pashalidis,I.;Czerwinski,K.R.;Fanghanel,T.;Kim,J.I. Radiochim.Acta 1997,76,55.

(40) Rude,W.Los Alamos Science 2000,26,412.

(41) Meinrath,G.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.1997,224,119.

(42) Meinrath,G.;Klenze,R.;Kim,J.I.Radiochim.Acta 1996,74, 81.

(43) Havel,J.;Soto-Guerrero,J.;Lubal,P.Polyhedron 2002,21, 1411.

(44) Tian,G.;Rao,L.J.Chem.Thermodyn.2009,41,569.

(45) Rao,L.;Tian,G.J.Chem.Thermodyn.2008,40,1001.

(46) Tian,G.;Rao,L.Inorg.Chem.2009,48,6748.

(47) Gong,C.M.S.;Poineau,F.;Czerwinski,K.R.Radiochim.Acta 2007,95,439.

September 26,2011;Revised:January 8,2012;Published on Web:January 17,2012.

Electronic Structures of Uranyl(VI)Carbonate Complexes in the Aqueous Phase

GU Jia-Fang1LU Chun-Hai2CHEN Wen-Kai1,*CHEN Yong1XU Ke1HUANG Xin1ZHANG Yong-Fan1
(1Department of Chemistry,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,P.R.China;2College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,P.R.China)

A systematic study of series of non-hydrated and hydrated Cn/m uranyl carbonate complexes (n is number of carbonate ligands,and m is number of water molecules)in the aqueous phase was carried out using relativistic density functional theory.The conductor-like screening model was used to calculate solvent effects.The zeroth-order regular approximation was used to account for scalar relativistic effects and spin-orbit coupling relativistic effects.Time-dependent density functional theory with the inclusion of spin-orbit coupling relativistic effects was used to calculate electronic transitions using the statistically averaged orbital potentials.The results indicate that carbonate ligands play an important role in the geometric and electronic transition properties of the complex.The stability of the C3/0 carbonate complex in the aqueous phase may be attributed to the involvement of 5f components in the highest occupied bonding orbital.The addition of carbonate ligands caused a blue shift in the maximum wavelength and high intensity absorptions in the near visible region.

Uranyl;UV-Vis;Solvent effect;Time-dependent density functional theory;Spin-orbit coupling relativistic effect

10.3866/PKU.WHXB201201171

O641

?Corresponding author.Email:qc2008@fzu.edu.cn;Tel:+86-591-22866162.

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(10676007)and Program for New Century Excellent Talents at the University of Fujian Province,China(HX2006-103).

國家自然科學基金(10676007)和福建省高等學校新世紀優(yōu)秀人才計劃(HX2006-103)資助項目