




摘""要:廣西是我國(guó)甘蔗的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)區(qū),85%以上甘蔗種植在無(wú)灌溉條件的旱地上,每年受到不同程度的旱害,干旱已成為制約我國(guó)甘蔗生產(chǎn)的主要限制因素。分蘗是影響甘蔗產(chǎn)量的重要性狀之一,在分蘗期探究干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗芽發(fā)育的影響,對(duì)于甘蔗高產(chǎn)栽培具有重要意義。桂熱2號(hào)是本團(tuán)隊(duì)選育的抗旱性好、分蘗性強(qiáng)的優(yōu)良甘蔗新品種,為了探究干旱脅迫對(duì)分蘗期甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的影響,本研究以桂熱2號(hào)甘蔗品種為研究材料,在甘蔗分蘗初期進(jìn)行干旱脅迫試驗(yàn),試驗(yàn)設(shè)置對(duì)照(土壤絕對(duì)含水量19%~25%)和干旱脅迫處理,干旱脅迫處理組停止?jié)菜謩e在干旱脅迫初期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量14%~15%)、干旱脅迫中期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量10%~11%)、干旱脅迫后期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量6%~7%)取樣,測(cè)定處理和對(duì)照干旱脅迫不同時(shí)期分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗氧化系統(tǒng)酶活性、丙二醛(MDA)、滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)和內(nèi)源激素含量變化,分析不同干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的相關(guān)性,并用隸屬函數(shù)法對(duì)分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。結(jié)果表明:干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的過(guò)氧化物酶(POD)活性、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性、脯氨酸(Pro)含量、可溶性蛋白(SP)含量、淀粉含量、蔗糖含量和ABA含量,特別是在分蘗幼苗中,處理組與對(duì)照組達(dá)到了顯著差異,而MDA含量在干旱脅迫過(guò)程中一直維持在相似的水平;干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的影響有所不同,相比于葉片,干旱脅迫更能顯著提高分蘗幼苗中的SOD活性及Pro、SP和蔗糖的含量。相關(guān)性分析結(jié)果表明:干旱脅迫下,甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片顯著相關(guān)的生理指標(biāo)大多數(shù)呈正相關(guān),蔗糖含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、IAA含量和SOD活性與其他指標(biāo)呈顯著或極顯著相關(guān);對(duì)分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性的綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果表明,甘蔗分蘗幼苗的抗旱能力強(qiáng)于甘蔗葉片。
關(guān)鍵詞:甘蔗;分蘗期;干旱脅迫;生理中圖分類(lèi)號(hào):S566.1""""""文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:A
Effects"of"Drought"Stress"on"Physiological"Indicators"in"Tiller"Shoots"and"Leaves"of"Sugarcane"at"Tillering"Stage
LI"Jiahui,"TANG"Yuwei,"CHENG"Qin,"SONG"Qiqi,"TAN"Qinliang,"ZHOU"Quanguang*,"LYU"Ping,"NONG"Zemei
Guangxi"Subtropical"Crop"Research"Institute,"Nanning,"Guangxi"530001,"China
Abstract:"Guangxi"is"the"leading"sugarcane"production"area"in"China."over"85%"of"the"sugarcane"is"planted"on"non-irrigated"dry"land,"and"varying"degrees"of"drought"damage"occur"every"year."Drought"is"the"main"limiting"factor"for"sugarcane"production"in"China."Tillering"is"one"of"the"important"traits"affecting"the"yield"of"sugarcane."It"is"of"great"significance"to"study"the"effectnbsp;of"drought"stress"on"the"development"of"tillering"buds"at"tillering"stage."Guire"2"is"a"new"sugarcane"variety"bred"by"our"team"with"good"drought"resistance"and"strong"tillering"ability."In"order"to"investigate"the"effects"of"drought"stress"on"physiological"indicators"of"sugarcane"tillering"seedlings"and"leaves"at"tillering"stage,"Guire"2"was"used"to"conduct"drought"stress"experiments"at"the"early"stage"of"sugarcane"tillering."The"experiment"was"set"up"with"control"(19%?25%"soil"absolute"water"content)"and"drought"stress"treatment"by"stopping"irrigation."Samples"were"taken"from"the"control"group"and"treatment"group"at"early"drought"stress"(14%?15%"soil"absolute"water"content),"middle"drought"stress"(10%?11%"soil"absolute"water"content),"late"drought"stress"(6%?7%"soil"absolute"water"content)"stages."The"changes"of"antioxidant"enzyme"activity,"MDA,"osmoregulatory"substances"and"endogenous"hormone"contents"were"measured"by"subordination"function"method."The"correlation"of"the"physiological"indicators"in"sugarcane"tiller"shoots"and"leaves"was"analyzed,"and"the"drought"resistance"of"tiller"shoots"and"leaves"was"evaluated."The"results"showed"that"drought"stress"increased"the"activities"of"peroxidase"(POD),"and"superoxidate"dismutase"(SOD),"and"contents"of"proline"(Pro),"soluble"protein,"starch,"sucrose"and"abscisic"acid"(ABA),"especially"in"tiller"shoots,"the"treatment"group"and"the"control"group"reached"a"significant"difference,"while"the"malondialdehyde"(MDA)"content"remained"at"a"similar"level"in"sugarcane"tillering"seedlings"and"leaves"during"drought"stress."Compared"with"leaves,"drought"stress"significantly"increased"the"activity"of"SOD"and"the"contents"of"Pro,"soluble"protein"and"sucrose"in"tiller"shoots."Correlation"analysis"showed"that"most"significant"correlations"between"the"physiological"indicators"in"sugarcane"tiller"shoots"and"leaves"under"drought"stress"were"positive,"and"sucrose"content,"starch"content,"Pro"content,"IAA"content"and"SOD"activity"were"more"significantly"or"extremely"significantly"correlated"with"other"indicators."According"to"the"comprehensive"drought"resistance"coefficient"and"the"average"of"subordinate"function"values"of"each"index,"the"drought"resistance"of"tiller"shoots"was"stronger"than"that"of"leaves"in"sugarcane.
Keywords:"sugarcane;"tillering"stage;"drought"stress;"physiology
DOI:"10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.04.013
干旱是限制作物增產(chǎn)最突出的非生物脅迫之一,一直是世界各國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)面臨且普遍存在的自然災(zāi)害[1]。我國(guó)干旱、半干旱地區(qū)的面積約占全國(guó)土地總面積的50%,干旱是限制我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)的重要因素之一[2]。甘蔗是全球重要的糖料和工業(yè)原料作物,世界食糖約86%由甘蔗提供[3]。廣西是我國(guó)甘蔗的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)區(qū),蔗區(qū)85%以上為旱坡地[4],大部分甘蔗種植在灌溉條件缺乏的旱地上,每年均出現(xiàn)不同程度的旱害,嚴(yán)重影響甘蔗生長(zhǎng)發(fā)育,可使甘蔗產(chǎn)量損失高達(dá)60%[5]。因此,研究甘蔗對(duì)干旱脅迫的響應(yīng)機(jī)制,提高甘蔗的抗旱性對(duì)確保廣西甘蔗產(chǎn)量的穩(wěn)定乃至全國(guó)食糖供給具有重要作用。
甘蔗在干旱條件下,自身會(huì)產(chǎn)生一系列生理生化變化以及保護(hù)性物質(zhì),以減輕干旱帶來(lái)的傷害,主要體現(xiàn)在抗氧化調(diào)節(jié)、滲透調(diào)節(jié)以及質(zhì)膜透性的調(diào)節(jié)等[6-7]。植物細(xì)胞內(nèi)的活性氧ROS在正常情況下處于動(dòng)態(tài)平衡并且維持在較低的水平,缺水導(dǎo)致植物中產(chǎn)生過(guò)量的活性氧,破壞體內(nèi)的氧化還原穩(wěn)態(tài),損傷植物組織[8]。耐旱甘蔗品種能通過(guò)提高抗氧化酶的活性來(lái)減輕氧化損傷[7],這些抗氧化酶主要包括超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、過(guò)氧化物酶(POD)等。李曉君等[9]對(duì)不同品種的甘蔗進(jìn)行耐旱性分析,結(jié)果表明,在干旱條件下,甘蔗葉片中的POD和SOD活性均呈上升趨勢(shì)。滲透壓的調(diào)節(jié)能有效降低植物細(xì)胞水勢(shì),防止細(xì)胞脫水,保證植物正常生長(zhǎng)[10]。可溶性糖(SS)、可溶性蛋白(SP)和脯氨酸(Pro)在滲透調(diào)節(jié)方面發(fā)揮著重要作用[11]。對(duì)甘蔗耐旱性研究表明,耐旱品種能積累更多的SS、SP和Pro,維持細(xì)胞的正常生長(zhǎng)[12]。丙二醛(MDA)含量是反映脂質(zhì)過(guò)氧化作用強(qiáng)弱的一個(gè)重要指標(biāo),研究表明干旱脅迫會(huì)導(dǎo)致甘蔗植株體產(chǎn)生大量MDA,使細(xì)胞膜透性增大[13],吳凱朝等[14]的研究也表明了MDA含量可以直接反映出逆境脅迫下細(xì)胞膜系統(tǒng)的過(guò)氧化程度,在干旱脅迫下的甘蔗植株葉片中的MDA含量明顯提高。干旱脅迫會(huì)導(dǎo)致甘蔗中內(nèi)源激素平衡被打破,研究表明,在干旱脅迫下甘蔗葉片內(nèi)源激素脫落酸(ABA)含量顯著提高[15],對(duì)干旱脅迫下甘薯的研究也表明,玉米素(ZR)和赤霉素(GA)含量下降,而ABA含量上升,地上部生長(zhǎng)及塊根分化和膨大受到抑制[16]。
桂熱2號(hào)是本團(tuán)隊(duì)自育的高產(chǎn)高糖優(yōu)良甘蔗新品種,前期以苗期干旱脅迫桂熱2號(hào)下甘蔗葉片為材料,對(duì)相關(guān)抗旱生理生化指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了研究,顯示其具有較好的抗旱性[15]。分蘗是甘蔗的重要生物學(xué)特性之一,分蘗的數(shù)量和質(zhì)量直接影響作物群體的結(jié)構(gòu)建成,并關(guān)聯(lián)其他農(nóng)藝性狀的發(fā)展,最終影響甘蔗產(chǎn)量形成[17],團(tuán)隊(duì)前期通過(guò)對(duì)3個(gè)蔗區(qū)5個(gè)試驗(yàn)點(diǎn)4個(gè)不同甘蔗品種(系)的分蘗性狀和產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成因子進(jìn)行相關(guān)研究,顯示桂熱2號(hào)屬于強(qiáng)分蘗甘蔗品種(系)[18]。目前甘蔗響應(yīng)干旱脅迫過(guò)程主要集中在以甘蔗葉片為材料的生理機(jī)制研究上,而針對(duì)甘蔗分蘗苗響應(yīng)干旱脅迫的生理機(jī)制報(bào)道較少。本研究以抗旱性好、分蘗性強(qiáng)的桂熱2號(hào)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片為研究材料,采用溫室大棚桶栽的方式,在甘蔗分蘗初期進(jìn)行不同程度的干旱脅迫處理,探究干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片內(nèi)源激素、滲透系統(tǒng)、保護(hù)酶系統(tǒng)及MDA含量的影響,同時(shí)開(kāi)展干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的相關(guān)性研究,對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片進(jìn)行抗旱性評(píng)價(jià),以期為甘蔗抗旱性研究及改進(jìn)甘蔗抗旱栽培提供理論依據(jù)。
1.1""材料
供試材料為廣西壯族自治區(qū)亞熱帶作物研究所自選育優(yōu)良抗旱甘蔗品種桂熱2號(hào),種莖來(lái)源于廣西壯族自治區(qū)亞熱帶作物研究所甘蔗種植基地。
1.2""方法
1.2.1""試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)""試驗(yàn)于2022年3月2日在廣西壯族自治區(qū)亞熱帶作物研究所甘蔗資源圃溫室大棚進(jìn)行。選擇健康無(wú)病蟲(chóng)害的桂熱2號(hào)甘蔗種莖,砍成單芽段,用1‰多菌靈浸泡0.5"h,種植于帶底座桶中,每桶種植2~3個(gè)單芽段,待甘蔗成幼苗時(shí)根據(jù)長(zhǎng)勢(shì)每桶留1株甘蔗幼苗。提前將土壤混合均勻并進(jìn)行暴曬。每桶裝土后拌混3"g復(fù)合肥作為基肥,共種植100桶。甘蔗種植后立刻澆水,確保每桶澆入足夠的水。甘蔗出苗后每隔1"d澆水1次,確保前期長(zhǎng)勢(shì)一致。
待甘蔗剛進(jìn)入分蘗初期,分蘗幼苗出土3~"5"cm時(shí)進(jìn)行干旱脅迫試驗(yàn)。試驗(yàn)設(shè)置對(duì)照組和處理組,每天測(cè)定對(duì)照組及處理組土壤絕對(duì)含水量,對(duì)照組正常澆水,土壤絕對(duì)含水量保持在19%~"25%;處理組停止?jié)菜鶕?jù)土壤含水量的不同設(shè)置3組不同程度的干旱脅迫時(shí)期,即干旱脅迫初期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量14%~15%)、干旱脅迫中期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量10%~11%)和干旱脅迫后期(土壤絕對(duì)含水量6%~7%)。自干旱脅迫處理開(kāi)始,每隔1"d測(cè)定對(duì)照組及處理組土壤絕對(duì)含水量及甘蔗分蘗幼苗農(nóng)藝性狀;在3個(gè)干旱脅迫時(shí)期分別對(duì)對(duì)照組和處理組的分蘗幼苗和甘蔗+1葉進(jìn)行取樣,用液氮處理后冷凍保存,用于相關(guān)生理指標(biāo)的測(cè)定。
1.2.2""項(xiàng)目測(cè)定""SOD、POD、SP、Pro的測(cè)定參考李合生[19]的方法;淀粉的測(cè)定參考劉萍等[20]的方法;蔗糖的測(cè)定參照華東師范大學(xué)生物系植物生理教研組主編的《植物生理實(shí)驗(yàn)指導(dǎo)》[21]的方法;MDA的測(cè)定參照CHEN等[22]的方法;生長(zhǎng)素(IAA)、獨(dú)角金內(nèi)酯(SLs)、反式玉米素(ZT)和脫落酸(ABA)含量的測(cè)定采用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附分析法(enzyme-linked"assay,ELISA),參照黃杏等[23]的方法進(jìn)行提取和測(cè)定,試劑盒購(gòu)自深圳子科生物科技有限公司,每個(gè)樣品重復(fù)測(cè)定3次。
1.3""數(shù)據(jù)處理
采用Microsoft"Excel"2019軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理和作圖,采用SPSS"23.0統(tǒng)計(jì)分析軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行顯著性分析和相關(guān)性分析。采用模糊數(shù)學(xué)中的隸屬函數(shù)法,計(jì)算干旱脅迫后期甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片相關(guān)生理指標(biāo)的抗旱系數(shù)、綜合抗旱系數(shù)、隸屬函數(shù)值和平均隸屬度[24]。公式如下:
各指標(biāo)抗旱系數(shù)PI=Xs/Xc" "(1)
隸屬函數(shù)U(X)=(PI-PIimin)/(PIimax-PIimin) (2)
式中,Xs和Xc分別為干旱和對(duì)照各指標(biāo)的測(cè)定值,U(X)為隸屬函數(shù)值,PIimin和PIimax為各指標(biāo)抗旱系數(shù)的最小值和最大值,綜合抗旱系數(shù)為各指標(biāo)抗旱系數(shù)平均值,平均隸屬度為各指標(biāo)的隸屬函數(shù)平均值。
2.1""干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片抗氧化系統(tǒng)酶活性的影響
由圖1可知,隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗幼苗及葉片處理組的SOD活性逐漸增加。在干旱脅迫中、后期,甘蔗幼苗、葉片處理的SOD活性均高于對(duì)照。其中,幼苗處理組的SOD活性在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照(Plt;0.05),葉片處理組的SOD活性在整個(gè)脅迫時(shí)期與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異,對(duì)照組之間無(wú)顯著差異。分蘗幼苗處理組的POD活性隨著脅迫時(shí)間的增加逐漸增加,但與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異;葉片處理組的POD活性呈先增加后下降趨勢(shì),在干旱脅迫中期顯著高于對(duì)照(Plt;0.05);對(duì)照組之間在整個(gè)脅迫時(shí)期無(wú)顯著差異。以上結(jié)果說(shuō)明,干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的SOD和POD活性,分蘗幼苗的SOD活性和葉片的POD活性差異顯著。
2.2""干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片MDA、滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)含量的影響
由圖2可知,干旱脅迫初、中、后期,甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的MDA含量均顯著高于對(duì)照,且一直維持在相似的水平;葉片處理組的MDA含量均高于對(duì)照,但無(wú)顯著差異,且一直維持在相似的水平。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫雖然提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的MDA含量,但在脅迫過(guò)程中無(wú)顯著差異,且在干旱脅迫下分蘗幼苗處理組的MDA含量顯著高于葉片的MDA含量。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組的Pro含量逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期,分蘗幼苗處理組的Pro含量顯著高于對(duì)照,葉片處理組的Pro含量與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異;在干旱脅迫初、中、后期,幼苗處理組的Pro含量均高于葉片處理組。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗的Pro含量,雖然也提高了葉片中的Pro含量,但和分蘗幼苗相比,未達(dá)到顯著差異。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的SP含量逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期達(dá)到最大值,顯著高于對(duì)照;葉片處理組的SP含量隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù)呈先增加后下降的趨勢(shì),在干旱脅迫中期達(dá)到最大值,但與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的SP含量,分蘗幼苗與葉片的SP對(duì)干旱脅迫的響應(yīng)有所不同,分蘗幼苗中的SP含量逐漸增加,葉片中的SP含量先增加后下降。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組的淀粉含量逐漸增加,分蘗幼苗處理組的淀粉含量在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照,葉片處理組的淀粉含量在干旱脅迫中期和后期均顯著高于對(duì)照。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的淀粉含量。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的蔗糖含量逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照;甘蔗葉片處理組的蔗糖含量先增加后下降,在干旱脅迫中、后期高于對(duì)照,但與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的蔗糖含量。
由此可知,干旱脅迫能提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的Pro、SP、淀粉、蔗糖含量,特別是在分蘗幼苗中,處理組與對(duì)照組達(dá)到了顯著差異。分蘗幼苗處理組的Pro、SP、淀粉和蔗糖含量均隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù)逐漸增加;葉片處理組的Pro和淀粉含量均隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù)逐漸增加,SP和蔗糖含量呈先增加后降低。另外,甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組的MDA含量在干旱脅迫過(guò)程中一直維持在相似的水平,說(shuō)明甘蔗植株可能通過(guò)提高滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)含量來(lái)減輕細(xì)胞膜系統(tǒng)過(guò)氧化對(duì)細(xì)胞的損傷。
2.3""干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片內(nèi)源激素的影響
由圖3可知,隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的IAA含量在干旱脅迫初、中期無(wú)顯著差異,在后期顯著增加;葉片處理組的IAA含量則呈先增加后下降。甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的IAA含量在干旱脅迫初、后期顯著高于對(duì)照組,葉片處理組的IAA含量在干旱脅迫中期顯著高于對(duì)照,說(shuō)明干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中IAA含量的影響不同。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片處理組的ZT含量均逐漸增加,分蘗幼苗處理組的ZT含量在干旱脅迫初、中期顯著高于對(duì)照,葉片處理組的ZT含量在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照;分蘗幼苗對(duì)照組的ZT含量在干旱脅迫后期顯著增加。說(shuō)明干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的ZT含量,同時(shí)隨著分蘗幼苗的生長(zhǎng),對(duì)照組分蘗幼苗的ZT含量也增加。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的ABA含量不同時(shí)期均顯著高于對(duì)照;葉片處理組的ABA含量逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的ABA含量。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的GA3含量降低,在干旱脅迫初期顯著高于對(duì)照;葉片處理組的GA3含量逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫中、后期顯著高于對(duì)照。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫增加了甘蔗葉片中的GA3含量,降低了甘蔗分蘗幼苗中的GA3含量。
隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的SLs含量先降低后增加,在干旱脅迫初、后期顯著高于對(duì)照;葉片處理組的SLs含量續(xù)逐漸增加,在干旱脅后期顯著高于對(duì)照。這說(shuō)明干旱脅迫增加了甘蔗葉片中的SLs含量。
綜上所述,干旱脅迫能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗芽和葉片的ABA含量;甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的IAA和ZT含量隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù)而逐漸增加,在干旱后期達(dá)到最大值;GA3和SLs含量則下降,在干旱脅迫初期達(dá)到最大值。甘蔗葉片處理組的ZT、GA3和SLs含量隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù)逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照;IAA含量先增加后下降。可見(jiàn),干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的各種內(nèi)源激素的影響有所不同。
2.4""干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片各指標(biāo)間的相關(guān)性分析
干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組各指標(biāo)的相關(guān)性,如表1所示,干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗各指標(biāo)間呈顯著相關(guān)的有3對(duì),呈極顯著相關(guān)的有17對(duì),且均是正相關(guān)關(guān)系;呈顯著相關(guān)關(guān)系的有ZT含量與淀粉含量、Pro含量、SOD活性之間,呈極顯著相關(guān)的主要在SOD活性、SP含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、蔗糖含量和IAA含量之間,如蔗糖含量與SOD活性、SP含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、IAA含量、ZT含量均呈極顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系。如表2所示,干旱脅迫下甘蔗葉片各指標(biāo)間呈顯著相關(guān)的有7對(duì),正相關(guān)6對(duì),負(fù)相關(guān)1對(duì);呈極顯著相關(guān)的有16對(duì),正相關(guān)15對(duì),負(fù)相關(guān)1對(duì)。呈負(fù)相關(guān)的是SP含量和SLs含量(?0.818**),SP含量和ZT含量(?0.705*)。呈極顯著正相關(guān)主要在SOD、POD、Pro、淀粉、蔗糖、IAA、ZT、ABA和SLs之間,如SOD活性和Pro含量呈極顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系,POD活性與蔗糖含量、IAA含量呈極顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系。
由此可見(jiàn),干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗顯著相關(guān)的生理指標(biāo)間均呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,葉片顯著相關(guān)的生理指標(biāo)間除SP含量與SLs含量、ZT含量呈負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系外,其他生理指標(biāo)間也均呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系;蔗糖含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、IAA含量和SOD活性與其他指標(biāo)呈顯著或極顯著相關(guān)關(guān)系較多,而MDA含量在分蘗幼苗或葉片中與其他指標(biāo)均無(wú)顯著性相關(guān)關(guān)系。
2.5""甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性評(píng)價(jià)
為了能夠比較全面地反映甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性,本研究采用模糊數(shù)學(xué)中隸屬函數(shù)法,選用干旱脅迫后期與甘蔗抗旱性關(guān)系密切的SOD活性、POD活性、MDA含量、SP含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量和蔗糖含量這7個(gè)生理指標(biāo),對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片抗旱性進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià)。結(jié)
干旱脅迫下植物體內(nèi)會(huì)產(chǎn)生活性氧ROS,并且隨著脅迫程度的增加而加快產(chǎn)生,對(duì)細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生傷害[25]。為了防止這些物質(zhì)對(duì)光合作用器官造成永久性損害,植物進(jìn)化出了高效而復(fù)雜的保護(hù)機(jī)制,其中酶是抗氧化系統(tǒng)中的重要角色,參與ROS的調(diào)節(jié)[26]。研究表明干旱脅迫下甘蔗葉片抗氧化保護(hù)酶系統(tǒng)中POD、CAT和SOD等酶的活力均不同程度增加[27-28],在所有水平的水分脅迫下,耐旱型甘蔗的SOD活性均高于敏感型,說(shuō)明耐旱甘蔗品種清除ROS的能力優(yōu)于敏感品種得益于SOD活性的升高[29]。在本研究中,隨著干旱脅迫的持續(xù),甘蔗分蘗幼苗及葉片處理組的SOD活性逐漸增加,甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的SOD活性在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照,甘蔗葉片處理組的SOD活性與對(duì)照均無(wú)顯著差異;甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的POD活性隨著脅迫時(shí)間的增加逐漸增加,但與對(duì)照無(wú)顯著差異;甘蔗葉片處理組的POD活性先增加后下降,在干旱脅迫中期顯著高于對(duì)照。可見(jiàn),干旱脅迫時(shí)甘蔗能通過(guò)提高分蘗幼苗和葉片的SOD和POD活性來(lái)降低脅迫產(chǎn)生過(guò)量的ROS對(duì)自身的損傷,這與前人的研究結(jié)果相符;同時(shí)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片SOD和POD活性對(duì)干旱脅迫的響應(yīng)存在差異。
在逆境條件下,如高溫、鹽堿、干旱以及強(qiáng)光等,植物體內(nèi)的自由基常會(huì)導(dǎo)致代謝失調(diào),往往發(fā)生膜脂過(guò)氧化作用。MDA是膜脂過(guò)氧化的產(chǎn)物,可以損傷生物膜結(jié)構(gòu),主要是細(xì)胞質(zhì)膜,MDA含量的多少可作為脂質(zhì)過(guò)氧化的指標(biāo),用于表示細(xì)胞膜過(guò)氧化程度和植物對(duì)干旱脅迫下反應(yīng)的強(qiáng)弱[30]。本研究中,甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組MDA的含量在干旱脅迫初、中、后期均顯著高于對(duì)照;甘蔗葉片處理組的MDA含量在干旱脅迫過(guò)程中也呈高于對(duì)照的趨勢(shì),但未達(dá)到統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)顯著差異。另外,甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組的MDA含量在干旱脅迫初、中、后期一直維持在相似的水平,無(wú)顯著差異,說(shuō)明在干旱脅迫過(guò)程中甘蔗細(xì)胞膜過(guò)氧化程度沒(méi)有持續(xù)增加,這可能和甘蔗具有較好的抗旱性有關(guān)。
滲透調(diào)節(jié)指植物體內(nèi)主動(dòng)積累各種有機(jī)或無(wú)機(jī)物質(zhì)來(lái)提高細(xì)胞液濃度,降低滲透勢(shì),提高細(xì)胞吸水或保水能力,是作物應(yīng)對(duì)干旱脅迫的重要響應(yīng)機(jī)制[31]。植物有兩大類(lèi)滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)參與調(diào)節(jié):一是有機(jī)溶質(zhì),是由細(xì)胞合成的小分子化合物,主要包括甘露醇、脯氨酸、甘氨酸、甜菜堿、可溶性糖等;二是K+和其他無(wú)機(jī)離子,由外界進(jìn)入植物細(xì)胞,主要作用是調(diào)節(jié)液泡的滲透勢(shì)[32]。脯氨酸積累已被證明是甘蔗抵御干旱脅迫保護(hù)性措施之一,可以減輕氧化作用對(duì)膜透性的破壞[33]。逆境下SP含量積累可以防止生物膜遭到破壞,進(jìn)一步提高植物自身的抗旱能力[34]。LIU等[35]研究表明,費(fèi)菜干旱脅迫后期SP和可溶性糖含量均增加。本研究結(jié)果表明干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片Pro、SP、淀粉、蔗糖等滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)的含量,特別是在甘蔗分蘗幼苗中,處理組與對(duì)照組達(dá)到了顯著差異,這與前人的研究結(jié)果相符。結(jié)合對(duì)MDA的研究結(jié)果,即處理組MDA含量在干旱脅迫初、中、后期無(wú)顯著差異,說(shuō)明在干旱脅迫下甘蔗可能通過(guò)提高滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)含量調(diào)控MDA含量,減輕細(xì)胞膜系統(tǒng)過(guò)氧化對(duì)細(xì)胞的損傷,提高甘蔗的抗旱性。與甘蔗葉片相比,干旱脅迫更能顯著地提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗的Pro、SP和蔗糖的含量,表明在干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗能夠持續(xù)產(chǎn)生更多的滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)緩解干旱對(duì)甘蔗的損傷,較甘蔗葉片有更高的抗旱性。
植物內(nèi)源激素在分蘗的發(fā)生與衰亡過(guò)程中起著關(guān)鍵的作用,對(duì)作物分蘗數(shù)量及最后產(chǎn)量形成都有顯著影響。近年來(lái),關(guān)于激素調(diào)控植物分蘗的研究已經(jīng)取得重大進(jìn)展,其中IAA、CK和SL是作用明確和清晰的3種激素,其中IAA和SL抑制分蘗幼苗生長(zhǎng),CK則促進(jìn)分蘗幼苗生長(zhǎng)[36]。在植物分蘗過(guò)程中,環(huán)境因子可改變植物內(nèi)源激素含量,促使其達(dá)到動(dòng)態(tài)平衡,進(jìn)而激發(fā)相關(guān)基因表達(dá)來(lái)影響分蘗[37-38]。ABA是植物細(xì)胞適應(yīng)干旱的關(guān)鍵因子,在植物抗逆反應(yīng)中起著重要作用。有研究證實(shí)在甘蔗[39]、玉米[40]、小麥[41]等作物中,干旱脅迫時(shí)植物體內(nèi)ABA含量會(huì)明顯增加,外施ABA能有效促進(jìn)內(nèi)源ABA的合成,提高植物激素的代謝活動(dòng)。在本研究中,甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的ABA含量在干旱脅迫不同時(shí)期均顯著高于對(duì)照,甘蔗葉片處理組的ABA含量在干旱后期顯著高于對(duì)照,說(shuō)明干旱脅迫能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中的ABA含量,這與前人的研究結(jié)果相符。另外在干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗處理組的IAA含量和SLs含量均是在初、后期顯著高于對(duì)照,在中期顯著低于對(duì)照,這可能跟IAA和SLs抑制分蘗苗的生長(zhǎng)有關(guān),干旱脅迫可能通過(guò)改變植物內(nèi)源激素來(lái)調(diào)控分蘗幼苗的生長(zhǎng)。在本研究中甘蔗分蘗幼苗對(duì)照組的ZT含量逐漸增加,可能是由于ZT是促進(jìn)分蘗幼苗生長(zhǎng)的激素,對(duì)照組甘蔗分蘗幼苗一直正常生長(zhǎng)。干旱脅迫下甘蔗葉片處理組的ZT、GA3和SLs含量均逐漸增加,在干旱脅迫后期顯著高于對(duì)照,可見(jiàn)干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片中內(nèi)源激素含量的影響有所不同。甘蔗的分蘗和抗逆性都是由多基因控制的數(shù)量性狀,激素調(diào)控甘蔗分蘗幼苗響應(yīng)干旱脅迫是多種內(nèi)源激素多途徑共同協(xié)作的結(jié)果,需要進(jìn)一步系統(tǒng)研究。
相關(guān)分析是指對(duì)2個(gè)或2個(gè)以上具有相關(guān)性的變量進(jìn)行分析,以衡量2個(gè)變量之間的相關(guān)程度[42]。本研究對(duì)干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片處理組各指標(biāo)進(jìn)行相關(guān)性分析發(fā)現(xiàn),干旱脅迫下分蘗幼苗和葉片顯著相關(guān)的生理指標(biāo)大多數(shù)呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,蔗糖含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、IAA含量和SOD活性與其他指標(biāo)呈顯著或極顯著相關(guān)關(guān)系較多,說(shuō)明干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片內(nèi)生理指標(biāo)的影響較為一致,蔗糖含量、淀粉含量、Pro含量、IAA含量和SOD活性可能在抵御干旱脅迫中發(fā)揮了重要作用。干旱對(duì)甘蔗的影響是復(fù)雜的,不同部位中的形態(tài)變化和生理變化也有所不同,為了更好地分析甘蔗的抗旱性,本研究選取多個(gè)生理指標(biāo),用隸屬函數(shù)法對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià),發(fā)現(xiàn)甘蔗分蘗幼苗各指標(biāo)的綜合抗旱系數(shù)和平均隸屬度均高于甘蔗葉片,說(shuō)明甘蔗分蘗幼苗的抗旱能力強(qiáng)于葉片。
綜上所述,本研究測(cè)定了分蘗期不同干旱脅迫時(shí)期甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片抗氧化酶活性、滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)含量及內(nèi)源激素含量的變化,同時(shí)開(kāi)展干旱脅迫下甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的相關(guān)性研究,結(jié)果表明干旱脅迫提高了甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的POD活性、SOD活性、Pro含量、SP含量、淀粉含量、蔗糖含量和ABA含量,特別是在甘蔗分蘗幼苗中,處理組與對(duì)照組達(dá)到了顯著差異,而MDA含量在干旱脅迫過(guò)程中一直維持在相似的水平;干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片生理指標(biāo)的影響有所不同,相比于葉片,干旱脅迫更能顯著提高甘蔗分蘗幼苗中的SOD活性及Pro、SP和蔗糖含量。相關(guān)性分析結(jié)果表明干旱脅迫下分蘗幼苗和葉片顯著相關(guān)的生理指標(biāo)大多數(shù)呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,用隸屬函數(shù)法對(duì)甘蔗分蘗幼苗和葉片的抗旱性進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià),從各指標(biāo)的綜合抗旱系數(shù)和平均隸屬度看,甘蔗分蘗幼苗的抗旱能力強(qiáng)于甘蔗葉片。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]"BASNAYAKE"J,"JACKSON"P,"BAMBER"N"I,"LAKSHMANAN"P."Sugarcane"for"water-limited"environments."genetic"variation"in"cane"yield"and"sugar"content"in"response"to"water"stress[J]."Journal"of"Experimental"Botany,"2012,"63(16):"6023-6033.
[5]"GENTILE"A,"DIAS"L"I,"MATTO"R"S,"FERREIRA"T"H,"MENOSSI"M."MicroRNAs"and"drought"responses"in"sugarcane[J]."Frontiers"in"Plant"Science,"2015,"6:"58.
[6]"DO"T"T,"李健,"張風(fēng)娟,"邢永秀,"楊麗濤,"李楊瑞,"NGUYEN"T"H."干旱脅迫下不同甘蔗品種葉片抗氧化酶活性和滲透調(diào)節(jié)物質(zhì)含量的變化[J]."熱帶作物學(xué)報(bào),"2018,"39(5):"858-866.DO"T"T,"LI"J,"ZHANG"F"J,"XING"Y"X,"YANG"L"T,"LI"Y"R,"NGUYEN"T"H."Changes"of"antioxidant"enzyme"activities"and"contents"of"osmotic"regulation"substances"in"leaves"of"different"sugarcane"varieties"under"drought"stress[J]."Chinese"Journal"of"Tropical"Crops,"2018,"39(5):"858-866."(in"Chinese)
[7]"李鴻博,"蔡偉俊,"謝雨彤,"鄧權(quán)清,"陳健文,"沈萬(wàn)寬."甘蔗新品系對(duì)干旱脅迫的生理響應(yīng)及抗旱性評(píng)價(jià)[J]."華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),"2019,"40(6):"51-58.LI"H"B,"CAI"W"J,"XIE"Y"T,"DENG"Q"Q,"CHEN"J"W,"SHEN"W"K."Physiological"responses"of"new"sugarcane"lines"to"drought"stress"andevaluation"of"their"drought"resistances[J]."Journal"of"South"China"Agricultural"University,"2019,"40(6):"51-58."(in"Chinese)
[8]"GILL"S"S,"TUTEJA"N."Reactive"oxygen"species"and"antioxidant"machinery"in"abiotic"stress"tolerance"in"crop"plants[J]."Plant"Physiol"Biochem,"2010,"48(12):"909-930.
[9]"李曉君,"羅正清,"陸昌強(qiáng),"唐吉昌,"周中,"曹琦."20個(gè)甘蔗品種系的抗旱性比較[J]."熱帶作物學(xué)報(bào),"2020,"41(9):"2482-2491.LI"X"J,"LUO"Z"Q,"LU"C"Q,"TANG"J"C,"ZHOU"Z,"CAO"Q."Evaluation"of"drought"resistance"on"twenty"sugarcane"varieties"(strains)[J]."Chinese"Journal"of"Tropical"Crops,"2020,"41(9):"2482-2491."(in"Chinese)
[10]"OZTURK"M,"TURKYILMAZ"U"B,"GARCIA-CAPARROS"P,"KHURSHEED"A,"GUL"A,"HASANUZZAMAN"M."Osmoregulation"and"its"actions"during"the"drought"stress"in"plants[J]."Plant"Physiology,"2021,"172(2):"1321-1335.
[11]"DONG"S"K,"JIANG"Y"G,"DONG"Y"C,"WANG"L"B,"WANG"A"J,"MA"Z"Z,"YAN"C,"MA"C"M,"LIU"L"J."A"study"on"soybean"responses"to"drought"stress"and"rehydration[J]."Saudi"Journal"of"Biological"Sciences,"2019,"26(8):"2006-2017.
[12]"ZHANG"Y"B,"YANG"S"L,"DAO"J"M,"DENG"J,"SHAHZAD"A"N,"FAN"X,"LInbsp;R"D,"QUAN"Y"J,"BUKHARI"S"A"H,"ZENG"Z"H."Drought-induced"alterations"in"photosynthetic,"ultrastructural"and"biochemical"traits"of"contrasting"sugarcane"genotypes[J]."Public"Library"of"Science"One,"2020,"15(7):"e0235845.
[13]"楊平飛."分根區(qū)交替灌溉對(duì)甘蔗生長(zhǎng)和生理生化特性影響的研究[D]."南寧:"廣西大學(xué),"2014.YANG"P"F."Research"on"the"effects"of"alternate"partial"root-"zone"irrigation"on"the"growth"and"physiological"and"bioche mical"characteristics"of"sugarcane[D]."Nangning:"Guangxi"University,"2014."(in"Chinese)
[14]"吳凱朝,"黃誠(chéng)梅,"鄧智年,"曹輝慶,"魏源文,"徐林,"李楊瑞,"楊麗濤."干旱后復(fù)水對(duì)甘蔗伸長(zhǎng)期生理生化特性的影響[J]."南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),"2015,"46(7):"1166-1172.WU"K"C,"HUANG"C"M,"DENG"Z"N,"CAO"H"Q,"WEI"Y"W,"XU"L,"LI"Y"R,"YANG"L"T."Effects"of"drought"stress"and"re-watering"on"physiological"biochemical"characteristics"in"sugarcane"at"elongation"stage[J]."Journal"of"Southern"Agriculture,"2015,"46(7):"1166-1172."(in"Chinese)
[15]"譚秦亮,"程琴,"潘成列,"朱鵬錦,"李佳慧,"宋奇琦,"農(nóng)澤梅,"周全光,"龐新華,"呂平."干旱脅迫對(duì)甘蔗新品種‘桂熱2號(hào)’生理指標(biāo)的影響[J]."作物雜志,"2022(3)":161-167.TAN"Q"L,"CHENG"Q,"PAN"C"L,"ZHU"P"J,"LI"J"H,"SONG"Q"Q,"NONG"Z"M,"ZHOU"Q"G,"PANG"X"H,"LYU"P."Effects"of"drought"stress"on"physiological"indexes"of"new"sugarcane"variety"Guire"2[J]."Crops,"2022(3):"161-167."(in"Chinese)
[16]"DUAN"W,"WANG"Q,"ZHANG"H,"XIE"B,"LI"A,"HOU"F,"DONG"S,"WANG"B,"QIN"Z,"ZHANG"L."Comparative"study"on"carbon-nitrogen"metabolism"and"endogenous"hormone"contents"in"normal"and"overgrown"sweetpotato[J]."South"African"Journal"of"Botany,"2018,"115:"199-207.
[17]"范業(yè)賡,"丘立杭,"陳榮發(fā),"周慧文,"李燕嬌,"閆海鋒,"羅含敏,"周忠鳳,"鄧宇馳,"吳建明."不同分蘗特性甘蔗品種生產(chǎn)力差異和相關(guān)性研究[J]."中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科技導(dǎo)報(bào),"2023,"25(12):"35-43.FAN"Y"G,"QIU"L"H,"CHEN"R"F,"ZHOU"H"W,"LI"Y"J,"YAN"H"F,"LUO"H"M,"ZHOU"Z"F,"DENG"Y"C,"WU"J"M."Study"on"productivity"differences"and"correlation"of"sugarcane"varieties"with"different"tillering"characteristics[J]."Journal"of"Agricultural"Science"and"Technology,"2023,"25(12):"35-43."(in"Chinese)
[18]"李佳慧,"程琴,"歐克緯,"譚秦亮,"龐新華,"周全光,"呂平,"宋奇琦,"唐毓瑋,"朱鵬錦."不同蔗區(qū)甘蔗品種(系)分蘗性狀比較及其對(duì)產(chǎn)量和產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成因子的影響[J]."作物雜志,"2021(5):"79-86.LI"J"H,"CHENG"Q,"OU"K"W,"TAN"Q"L,"PANG"X"H,"ZHOU"Q"G,"LYU"P,"SONG"Q"Q,"TANG"Y"W,"ZHU"P"J."Comparison"of"tiller"characters"of"sugarcane"varieties"(lines)"in"different"sugarcane"regions"and"their"effects"on"yield"andnbsp;yield"components[J]."Crops,"2021(5):"79-86."(in"Chinese)
[19]"李合生."植物生理生化實(shí)驗(yàn)原理和技術(shù)[M]."北京:"高等教育出版社,"2000.LI"H"S."Principles"and"techniques"of"plant"physiology"and"biochemistry"experiments[M]."Beijng:"Higher"Education"Press,"2000."(in"Chinese)
[20]"劉萍,"李明軍."植物生理學(xué)試驗(yàn)[M]."北京:"科學(xué)出版社,"2016.LIU"P,"LI"M"J."Plant"physiology"experiment[M]."Beijing:"Science"Press,"2016."(in"Chinese)
[21]"華東師范大學(xué)生物系植物生理教研組."植物生理實(shí)驗(yàn)指導(dǎo)[M]."上海:"人民教育出版社,"1980.Plant"Physiology"Teaching"Group,"Department"of"Biology,"East"China"Normal"University."Guidelines"for"plant"physiology"experiments[M]."Shanghai:"People's"Education"Press,"1980."(in"Chinese)
[22]"CHEN"Y"L,"LI"R"K,"GE"J"F,"LIU"J"G,"WANG"W"B,"XU"M"F,"ZHANG"R,"HUSSAIN"S,"WEI"H"H,"DAI"Q"G."Exogenous"melatonin"confers"enhanced"salinity"tolerance"in"rice"by"blocking"the"ROS"burst"and"improving"Na+/K+"homeostasis[J]."Environmental"and"Experimental"Botany,"2021,"189:"104530.
[23]"黃杏,"陳明輝,"楊麗濤,"張保青,"李楊瑞."低溫脅迫下外源ABA對(duì)甘蔗幼苗抗寒性及內(nèi)源激素的影響[J]."華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),"2013,"32(4):"6-11.HUANG"X,"CHEN"M"H,"YANG"L"T,"ZHANG"B"Q,"LI"Y"R."Effects"of"exogenous"abscisic"acid"on"cell"membrane"and"endogenous"hormones"contents"in"leaves"of"sugarcane"seedling"under"cold"stress[J]."Journal"of"Huazhong"Agricultural"University,"2013,"32(4):"6-11."(in"Chinese)
[24]"鄭清嶺,"楊冬艷,"劉建文,"張鳳蘭,"楊忠仁,"郝麗珍."干旱脅迫對(duì)沙芥和斧形沙芥幼苗生長(zhǎng)及抗氧化系統(tǒng)的影響[J]."植物生理學(xué)報(bào),"2017,"53(4):"600-608.ZHENG"Q"L,"YANG"D"Y,"LIU"J"W,"ZHANG"F"L,"YANG"Z"R,"HAO"L"Z."Effects"of"drought"stress"on"growth"and"antioxid ant"system"of"Pugionium"cornutum"and"P."dolabratum"seed lings[J]."Plant"Physiology"Journal,"2017,"53(4):"600-608."(in"Chinese)
[25]"MOLLER"I"M,"JENSEN"P"E,"HANSSON"A."Oxidative"modifications"to"cellular"components"in"plants[J]."Annual"Review"of"Plant"Biology,"2007,"58:"459-481.
[26]"DAS"K,"ROYCH"O"U,"DHURY"A."Reactive"oxygen"species"(ROS)"and"response"of"antioxidants"as"ROS-"scavengers"during"environmental"stress"in"plants[J]."Frontiers"in"Environmental"Science,"2014,"2:"53.
[27]"SHINOZAKI,"YAMAGUCHI"S"K,"SEKI"M."Regulatory"netw"ork"of"gene"expression"in"the"drought"and"cold"stress"responses[J]."Current"Opinion"in"Plant"Biology,"2003,"6(5):"410-417.
[28]"吳凱朝."干旱和復(fù)水條件下甘蔗特異基因誘導(dǎo)表達(dá)及其克隆的研究[D]."南寧:"廣西大學(xué),"2013.WU"K"C."Cloning"and"expression"of"specific"genes"induced"under"drought"and"re-watering"in"sugarcane"(Saccharum"spp."L.)[D]."Nanning:"Guangxi"University,"2013."(in"Chinese)
[29]"陸珍,"楊麗濤,"邢永秀,"李楊瑞."甘蔗響應(yīng)干旱脅迫研究進(jìn)展[J]."分子植物育種,"2023,"21(6):"2051-2060.LU"Z,"YANG"L"T."XING"Y"X,"LI"Y"R."Research"advances"on"sugarcane"response"to"drought"stress[J]."Molecular"Plant"Breeding,"2023,"21(6):"2051-2060."(in"Chinese)
[30]"李健,"農(nóng)艷豐,"陸艾櫻."甜菜堿對(duì)甘蔗抗旱生理的調(diào)控效應(yīng)[J]."農(nóng)業(yè)與技術(shù),"2022,"42(15):"31-34.LI"J,"NONG"Y"F,"LU"A"Y."Regulation"effect"of"betaine"on"drought"resistance"physiology"of"sugarcane[J]."Agriculture"and"Technology,"2022,"42(15):"31-34."(in"Chinese)
[31]"蔡慶生."植物生理學(xué)[M]."北京:"中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)出版社,"2011.CAI"Q"S."Plant"physiology[M]."Beijing:"China"Agricultural"University"Press,"2011."(in"Chinese)
[32]"畢黎明,"劉偉麗,"李楊瑞."甘蔗抗旱性研究進(jìn)展與展望[J]."廣西農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué),"2006(5):"522-527.BI"L"M,"LIU"W"L,"LI"Y"R."Advances"and"prospects"in"study"on"sugarcane"drought"resistance[J]."Journal"of"Southern"Agriculture,"2006(5):"522-527."(in"Chinese)
[33]"楊善,"周鴻凱,"謝平,"陳翰文,"秦海龍,"葉昌輝."保水措施對(duì)旱坡地甘蔗產(chǎn)量與品質(zhì)的影響[J]."熱帶作物學(xué)報(bào),"2016,"37(4):"647-652.YANG"S,"ZHOU"H"K,"XIE"P,"CHEN"H"W,"QIN"H"L,"YE"C"H."Effects"of"water"saving"measures"on"yield"and"quality"of"sugarcane"in"dry"sloping"land[J]."Chinese"Journal"of"Tropical"Crops,"2016,"37(4):"647-652."(in"Chinese)
[34]"高昆,"石義妃."干旱脅迫對(duì)粉葛幼苗生長(zhǎng)及生理特性的影響[J]."江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué),"2021,"49(8):"153-157.GAO"K,"SHI"Y"F."Effects"of"drought"stress"on"growth"and"physiological"characteristics"of"Pueraria"lobata"seedlings[J]."Jiangsu"Agricultural"Sciences,"2021,"49(8):"153-157."(in"Chinese)
[35]"LIU"Y,"HE"Z,"XIE"Y,"SU"L,"ZHANG"R,"WANG"H,"LI"C,"LONG"S."Drought"resistance"mechanisms"of"Phedimus"aizoon"L.[J]."Scientific"reports,"2021,"11(1):"13600.
[36]"XIA"X"J,"DONG"H,"YIN"Y"L,"SONG"X"W,"GU"X"H,"SANG"K"Q,"ZHOU"J,"SHI"K,"ZHOU"Y"H,"FOYER"C"H,"YU"J"Q."Brassinosteroid"signaling"integrates"multiple"pathways"to"release"apical"dominance"in"tomato[J]."Proceedings"of"the"National"Academy"of"Sciences"of"the"United"States"of"America,"2021,"118(11):"e2004384118.
[37]"SEALE"M,"BENNETT"T,"LEYSER"O."BRC1"expression"regulates"bud"activation"potential"but"is"not"necessary"or"sufficient"for"bud"growth"inhibition"in"Arabidopsis[J]."Development,"2017,"144(9):"1661-1673.
[38]"GONZALEZ"G"E,"PAJORO"A,nbsp;FRANCO-ZORRILLA"J"M,"TARANCON"C,"HIMMINK"R"G,"CUBAS"P."Abscisic"acid"signaling"is"controlled"by"a"BRANCHED1/HD-ZIP"I"cascade"in"Arabidopsis"axillary"buds[J]."Proceedings"of"the"National"Academy"of"Sciences"of"the"United"States"of"America,"2017,"114"(2):"245-254.
[39]"李長(zhǎng)寧,"謝金蘭,"王維贊,"梁強(qiáng),"李毅杰,"董文斌,"劉曉燕,"楊麗濤,"李楊瑞."水分脅迫下甘蔗差異表達(dá)基因篩選及激素相關(guān)基因分析[J]."作物學(xué)報(bào),"2015,"41(7):"1127-1135.LI"C"N,"XIE"J"L,"WANG"W"Z,"LIANG"Q,"LI"Y"J,"DONG"W"B,"LIU"X"Y,"YANG"L"T,"LI"Y"R."Screening"of"differentially"expressed"genes"and"analysis"of"plant"hormones"related"genes"under"water"stress"in"sugarcane[J]."Acta"Agronomica"Sinica,"2015,"41(7):"1127-1135."(in"Chinese)
[40]"LIU"J,"JIANG"M"Y,"ZHOU"Y"F,"LIU"Y"L."Production"of"polyamines"is"enhanced"by"endogenous"abscisic"acid"in"maize"seedlings"subjected"to"salt"stress[J]."Journal"of"Integrative"Plant"Biology,"2005,"47:"1326-1334.
[41]"IQBAL"M,"ASHRAF"M,"REHMAN"S"U,"RHA"E"S."Does"polyamine"seed"pretreatment"modulate"growth"and"levels"of"some"plant"growth"regulators"in"hexaploid"wheat"(Triticum"aestivum"L.)"plants"under"salt"stress?[J]."Botanical"Studies,"2006,"47(3):"239-250.
[42]"顧永麗,"胡勇,"周建云,"黃寧,"王藝焜,"艾復(fù)清."煙葉成熟過(guò)程主要生理生化指標(biāo)鑒定及相關(guān)性分析[J]."分子植物育種,"2021,"19(15):"5137-5142.GU"Y"L,"HU"Y,"ZHOU"J"Y,"HUANGnbsp;N,"WANG"Y"K,"AI"F"Q."Identification"and"correlation"analysis"of"primary"physiological"and"biochemical"indexes"during"tobacco"leaf"maturation[J]."Molecular"Plant"Breeding,"2021,"19(15):"5137-5142."(in"Chinese)