999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Role of biliary complications in chronic graft rejection after living donor liver transplantation

2022-11-28 05:29:13AimanObedAbdallaBashirAnwarJarradLaszloFuzesi
World Journal of Hepatology 2022年5期

Aiman Obed,Abdalla Bashir,Anwar Jarrad,Laszlo Fuzesi

Aiman Obed,Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit,Jordan Hospital,Amman 52112,Jordan

Abdalla Βashir,Department of General Surgery,Jordan Hospital,Amman 52112,Jordan

Anwar Jarrad,Department of Hepatology,Jordan Hospital,Amman 52112,Jordan

Laszlo Fuzesi,Department of Pathology,Faculty of Medicine,University Augsburg,Augsburg 86156,Germany

Abstract Postoperative biliary complications remain a substantial challenge after living donor liver transplantation,especially due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation.

Key Words: Chronic graft rejection;Biliary complications;Living donor liver transplantation;Graft survival;Cholangiopathy

TO THE EDlTOR

With great interest,we read the article by Guirguiset al[1]entitled “Biliary complications in recipients of living donor liver transplantation: A single-center study”.The study presents the findings on 169 recipients of right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation,which were followed for at least 1 year,or until graft or patient loss occurred.Based on their data on biliary leakage,biliary infection,and biliary stricture,as well as the presence of chronic graft rejection(CGR)and failure,the authors conclude that biliary infection/complications are an independent risk factor for CGR and graft failure in their study population.

While we congratulate the team on its attempt to unravel the impact of biliary complications on graft survival and mortality,we believe that some conclusions drawn in the article must be critically addressed.

First,the authors reference a study on a pediatric study population and deduce that biliary infection is a risk factor for CGR.However,in the mentioned study by Tannuriet al[2],the authors merely conclude that the occurrence of ductopenia is linked to a poor prognosis in pediatric patients with CGR.Furthermore,the authors outline main pathological changes that indicate CGR,such as vanishing bile duct syndrome and obliterative arteriopathy.Hence,Tannuriet alinterpret ductopenia as the result of CGR,not its cause.

On that note,we want to turn the attention to well-defined classifications of CGR,especially in liver grafts for children and adults,respectively.In the updatedInternational Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection,Demetriset al[3]describe the features of CGR in accordance to histopathological findings of explanted liver tissue.Hereby,leading indicators of advanced CGR are outlined.These include,amongst others,loss of bile ducts(BD)of more than half of portal tracts,as well as the discovery of a foam cell obliterative arteriopathy in rejected tissue.Meanwhile,the loss of BD in less than 50% of portal tracts,BD degeneration,perisinusoidal fibrosis,and inflammation are considered preliminary findings for CGR after liver transplantation.

Second,in their retrospective multivariate analysis,Horsteret al[4]reported on their 12-year experience with 352 liver transplant recipients.They identified HCV serostatus and high peritransplantation viral serum loads as independent risk factors for postoperative anastomotic strictures.While non-anastomotic strictures,the presence of bile leaks,and subsequent treatment interventions worsened graft outcome in all patients,no increase of CGR was detected.Notably,biliary complications and HCV serum positivity exerted additive effects,although individually they did not alter the risk for graft loss.However,HCV-positive patients with BCs displayed significantly worse graft outcomes.The authors did not conclude that biliary infections would lead to CGR.

Although we understand that distinguishing between CGR and other causes of post-transplant cholangiopathy(PTC)might be histologically challenging and clinically difficult,it is of great significance to characterize the underlying etiology in order to provide our patients with the best available treatment and procedures.Thus,we appreciate CGR as one possible cause of the posttransplant cholangiopathy.

Leading to increased patient morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation,these entities require highly experienced physicians for a clear distinction and prompt intervention.The term PTC encompasses a wide range of histological donor bile duct aberrations,including biliary stricture,cast formation to full thickness and,even,bile duct necrosis with intrahepatic biloma development.As per definition,the presence of thrombosis,severe stenosis of the hepatic artery,or underlying chronic autoimmune disease(i.e.,primary sclerosing cholangitis)is excluded from the definition of PTC[5].We conclude that other causes of PTC can be mistaken for suspected chronic graft failure with assumed biliary etiology.Thus,additional measures should be taken to prevent misdiagnosis in this highly susceptible patient collectives.

In essence,we are delighted to see the efforts at Ain Shams University,Egypt to better understand clinical observations on biliary complications after right lobe living donor liver transplantation,in order to sustainably achieve better patient outcomes.Nevertheless,the cases of biliary-based CGR should be validated by carefully distinguishing this uncommon condition from multifocal biliary pathologies of other etiologies.Adequately powered,prospective study designs with larger study populations could effectively contribute to a better understanding and improved therapy options.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Obed A designed the research;Obed A,Füzesi L,and Jarrad A performed research and revised the letter;Bashir A and Obed A analyzed the data;Obed A and Bashir A wrote the letter.

Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest for this article.

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial(CC BYNC 4.0)license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:United States

ORClD number:Aiman Obed 0000-0001-7519-9868;Abdalla Bashir 0000-0001-7128-1979;Anwar Jarrad 0000-0001-8749-8160;Laszlo Fuzesi 0000-0002-9943-636X.

S-Editor:Wang LL

L-Editor:Wang TQ

P-Editor:Wang LL

主站蜘蛛池模板: 好久久免费视频高清| 九九久久精品免费观看| 日韩视频精品在线| 久无码久无码av无码| jizz国产视频| 国产精品久久精品| 91香蕉视频下载网站| 91久久精品国产| 午夜欧美在线| 日韩精品高清自在线| 97se亚洲综合| 亚洲一区二区约美女探花| 欧美在线中文字幕| 91精品国产一区| 国产99久久亚洲综合精品西瓜tv| 日韩欧美成人高清在线观看| 欧美a√在线| 99re在线免费视频| 国产成人1024精品| 特级aaaaaaaaa毛片免费视频| 婷婷色一二三区波多野衣| 国产又粗又猛又爽| 久久不卡国产精品无码| 在线免费观看AV| 欧美成人午夜视频| а∨天堂一区中文字幕| 一级一毛片a级毛片| 99re在线观看视频| 中文字幕日韩丝袜一区| 色偷偷av男人的天堂不卡| 日韩亚洲综合在线| 亚洲国产精品一区二区高清无码久久| 欧美午夜网| 一级毛片中文字幕| 日本高清视频在线www色| 欧美日韩国产一级| 香蕉久久国产超碰青草| 欧美一区二区丝袜高跟鞋| 国产va在线| 精品国产三级在线观看| 最新国产麻豆aⅴ精品无| 欧美在线网| 亚洲无线一二三四区男男| 人人91人人澡人人妻人人爽| 国产AV毛片| 国产日韩精品欧美一区喷| 小说区 亚洲 自拍 另类| 国产福利微拍精品一区二区| 精品午夜国产福利观看| 亚洲男人在线| 免费观看国产小粉嫩喷水| 免费国产无遮挡又黄又爽| 无码丝袜人妻| 日韩欧美中文亚洲高清在线| 亚洲国产成人超福利久久精品| 国产精品亚洲αv天堂无码| 99视频国产精品| 国产主播一区二区三区| 狠狠躁天天躁夜夜躁婷婷| 色哟哟国产精品一区二区| 在线永久免费观看的毛片| 欧美色综合网站| 午夜精品影院| 最近最新中文字幕在线第一页 | 亚洲一级毛片在线观播放| 一区二区三区毛片无码| 久久久久久尹人网香蕉 | 欧美午夜一区| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区z| 国产在线精品人成导航| 国产精品偷伦在线观看| 成人国产精品网站在线看| 91日本在线观看亚洲精品| 国产精品视频猛进猛出| 国产成人精品优优av| 在线毛片网站| 99精品这里只有精品高清视频| 六月婷婷精品视频在线观看| 免费高清毛片| 草草线在成年免费视频2| 日本黄网在线观看| 成年人福利视频|