999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Design of an Experimental Set?up Concerning Interfacial Stress to Promote Measurement Accuracy of Adhesive Shear Strength Between Ice and Substrate

2022-11-21 09:53:10,,,,

,,,,

1.College of Aerospace Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,P.R.China;2.State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,P.R.China

Abstract: Accumulation of ice on airfoils and engines seriously endangers the safety of the fight.The accurate measurement of adhesion strength at the ice-substrate interface plays a vital role in the design of anti/de-icing systems.In this pursuit,the present study envisages the evaluation of the stress at the icesubstrate interface to guide the design of experimental set-ups and improve the measurement accuracy of shear strength using the finite element analysis(FEA)method.By considering such factors as the peeling stress,maximum von-mises stress and uniformity of stress,the height and radius of ice and the loading height are investigated.Based on the simulation results,appropriate parameters are selected for the experimental validation.Simulation results show that the peeling stress is decreased by reducing the loading height and increasing the height of ice.Higher ice,increasing loading height and smaller ice radius are found to be beneficial for the uniformity of stress.To avoid cracks or ice-breaking,it is imperative that the ice should be of a small radius and greater height.Parameters including the ice height of 25 mm,radius of 20 mm,and loading height of 9 mm are adopted in the experiment.The results of FEA and the experimental validation can significantly enhance the measurement accuracy of shear strength.

Key words:aircraft de-icing;adhesive shear strength;finite element analysis(FEA);experimental set-up;interfacial stress

0 Introduction

When an aircraft encounters a cold cloud condi?tion during the flight,the icing on craft surface can occur.Aircraft icing causes overall lift falling and an increase in the drag,and can lead to a serious threat to flight safety.The research of effective anti/de-ic?ing systems needs a significant attention in the air?craft design.Currently,there are several well-estab?lished anti/de-icing systems,including the electro?thermal system,electro impulse system,and hotair system.Meanwhile,some new technologies,such as superhydrophobic surfaces,plasma jet,and hybrid systems have been developed remarkably[1-2].

The core of ice shedding is to break the adhe?sion between the ice and the skin.Only if the adhe?sion is broken will the ice fall off the surface of air?craft due to its own gravity or aerodynamic forces.Thus,regardless of the anti/de-icing technology used,it is of great significance to understand the ad?hesion between the ice and skin,especially for the design of the anti/de-icing system.Many research?ers have studied the adhesion force between ice and substrates.The anti-icing materials international lab?oratory(AMIL)introduced the centrifuge adhesion test(CAT)to investigate the adhesion force in 2005,which utilized the centrifugal force to shed the ice[3].According to the archetype of the AMIL’s test,improved centrifugal tests were later devel?oped.Itagaki[4]calculated the adhesion strength based on the dimension of the dislodged ice.Com?paring with the CAT,this test was not ex situ icing and thus avoided some extra stress.This method was also called the calculated CAT(CCAT).Brou?wers et al.[5]used the instrumented CAT(ICAT)to study the ice adhesion,which involved an airfoil and impact ice in the test.Besides the centrifugal tests,other more direct methods have also been used.In these methods,the interface between the ice and the substrate was separated by the force ap?plied on the ice sample.A push test was used to in?vestigate the relationship between the water wetta?bility and ice adhesion by Meuler et al[6].Ge et al.[7]pushed the ice using a needle to evaluate the anti-ic?ing property of the superhydrophobic surface.Scav?uzzo et al.[8]and Druez et al.[9-10]used a test appara?tus that pushed the accreted ice around a metallic cylinder.Recently,Pervier et al.[11]designed a new setup to measure the adhesive shear strength of im?pact ice on alloy,in which the ice was pushed by high-pressure nitrogen through a pressurization sys?tem.In comparison with the centrifugal method,the direct-force test had merits of low cost,high effi?ciency,and validity.Thus,while the centrifugal tests,in general,have more reasonable scatter.So most scholars adopted the direct-force methods.

Although numerous experimental studies have been conducted in this arena,data from literatures has a serious lack of consistency.One of the main factors behind this is the complexity of the stress contribution at the interface.However,most of the research only paid attention to the experimental data and ignored the finite element analysis(FEA)for the stress at the interface.According to a review of Ref.[12],more than 100 papers reported experi?mental data,but only eight used FEA and just five of these papers were published after 2009.Koivuluo?to et al.[13]demonstrated the stress concentration at the interface for CAT throughout FEA.Makkonen’s FEA results indicated that the thermal stress was in?duced at the interface during the frozen process,which affected the adhesion strength to a certain de?gree[14].In 2015,Schulz et al.[15]analyzed the inter?face stresses created by various methods,including shear,bending and centrifugal test,showing that peel stress also contributed along with the shear stress in the detachment of the ice.Pervier et al.[11]used FEA to assess the controlling shear stress in the most highly stressed zone of the ice-substrate in?terface.As a result,the shear strength was defined by the critical stress intensity.Thus,it can be in?ferred that the inaccuracy of experimental results was mainly caused by the stress concentration,nor?mal stress(not pure shear stress),and possible icebreaking at the ice-substrate interface.

In the present study,an experimental valida?tion based on the push approach is performed to measure the adhesive shear strength and analyze the three factors(mentioned above)obtained from a pri?or FEA study.Depending on the results of FEA,the parameters are selected to enhance the measure?ment precision.By including the comprehensive FEA for deciphering the interfacial stress during the set-up design stage,we adopt a more rational equip?ment and achieve highly accurate tests,thereby leading to more even stress distribution,less peel?ing stress,and a lower possibility of ice breaking.

1 Computation Scheme

1.1 Finite element method

The finite element method is an approximate numerical analysis method,in which the structure is divided into finite elements,and then the displace?ment mode is constructed on the elements.Subse?quently,the stress of each element can be solved through constitutive equations.In the present study,we acquire the stress distribution at the ice-substrate interface using the finite element analysis.

1.2 Simulation model

Direct-force test typified by using the push method is one of the most reliable approaches in de?termining the adhesive strength between ice and sub?strate.By using this principle,an experimental setup is devised as shown in Fig.1.

Fig.1 Design of experimental set-up and simulation model

Normally,ice gets frozen in a mold on the alu?minum plate first.Then the sliding table is driven by the motor move towards the ice.Naturally,the force transducer and the probe also move to push the mold and ice to slide.At the moment of ice de?tachment from the substrate,the sensor indication is the adhesion shear force.By dividing the adhesion force by the contact area between ice and the alumi?num plate,the shear strength can be calculated by

whereτis the adhesion shear strength,Fthe adhe?sion shear force,andAthe contact area between ice and the aluminum plate.

The zone in which the ice is in contact with the substrate,is the part that concerns us most.Hence,FEA in this study mainly focuses on the aluminum plate,frozen mold,and ice,as indicated in the rightmost part of Fig.1.The external push force is directly applied to the set point on the mold.The contact of mold-substrate and ice-substrate is fric?tionless and bonded respectively and the aluminum plate is fixed.Based on this model,we investigate the effect of three parameters including the radius of icer,the loading height of push forceh,and the height of iceHon the interface stress,as shown in Fig.2.

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of parameters

It is worth noting that this FEA model ignores the surface topography,so the real shear strength between the ice and aluminum substrate cannot be achieved from the FEA results.The aim of FEA in this study is to explore the interface stress at various parameters in order to reduce experimental errors at the source.

1.3 Stress at ice?substrate interface

1.3.1 Peeling stress

Owing to the distance from the ice-substrate in?terface to the loading point,the applied push force produces a bending moment at the interface,result?ing in tensile stress and compression stress.The ten?sile stress promotes the peeling of the accumulated ice layer to some extent,so it is also called peeling stress.The presence of the peeling stress causes the mixed failure of shear and normal direction,which degrades the accuracy of adhesion shear strength measurement.

As shown in Fig.2,the bending moment at the interface can be calculated by

whereMis the bending moment andPthe applied push force.

The section modulus in bendingWis

Thus,by Eqs.(2,3),the maximum peeling stressσmaxcan be solved as

1.3.2 Von?mises stress

The von-mises stress is an equivalent stress based on shear strain energy,which is a combina?tion of three principal stress.It reflects the compre?hensive force on the object.In addition,it is more reasonable to use von-mises stress to evaluate the stresses in ice because ice shows different elasticity and plasticity under different loading conditions.It is given by

whereσeqis the von-mises stress;σ1,σ2andσ3are the first,second and third principal stress,respec?tively.In this study,σeqis used to evaluate the uni?formity of the stress and whether the ice is broken at the interface.

2 Presentation of FEA Results

2.1 Peeling stress

As described in Section 1.3.1,the peeling stress is unfavorable for the measurement of shear strength,so it is expected to select a set of parame?ters with the lowest peeling stress.Fig.3 shows the effect of the height of loading pointhand the height of iceHon the maximum peeling stress.It is obvi?ous that the maximum peeling stress increases with the height of the loading point,which is in accor?dance with Eq.(4).

Fig.3 Effect of loading location and ice height on peeling stress

Besides the effect of loading height,the rise in height of the ice also leads to a decline in the maxi?mum peeling stress.However,His not included in Eq.(4).In other words,the height of ice theoretical?ly exhibits no impact on the peeling stress.In fact,the frozen mold could be neglected when deducing Eq.(4).To survey the influence of the frozen mold on the FEA results,a path is defined along the di?rection of the height of ice as drawn in Fig.4 and the stress along this path is plotted,in which the area enclosed by the curve and the two coordinate axes is defined as stress momentT.The subgraph in the up?per right corner of Fig.4 depicts the change of stress moment at different heights of ice.It can be seen that the stress moment diminishes with an increase in the height of ice,as shown in Fig.3.Apparently,the frozen mold transfers the applied concentration load to various distributed stress.Although the high ice had a longer path under stress,the magnitude of stress is lower than that of the short ice,leading to the minimization of stress moment.

Fig.4 Effect of frozen mold on peeling stress

As for the radius of icer,the FEA results are demonstrated in the blue curve in Fig.5.With an in?crease in the radius,there is a corresponding de?crease in the peeling stress,agreeing with Eq.(4).However,it must be noted that the applied push force is constant when there is a change in the radi?us.In reality,as Eq.(1)shows,when the shear strength remains constant,the shear force should in?crease proportionally with the radius of ice.There?fore,it is essential to study the difference of the maximum peeling stress when the applied force also rises proportionally to balance the increasing adhe?sion shear force.Here,the constant value of shear strength is 1 MPa[12].As the red line illustrates,the trend of the curve does not show a monotonous change and no obvious law could be concluded.In the current range of options,a radius of 20 mm is the best choice.

Fig.5 Effect of ice radius on peeling stress

2.2 Uniformity of stress

Eq.(1)is used to calculate the shear stress,when the data of shear force is obtained from experi?ments.However,this equation is based on the as?sumption that the stress distribution at the interface is entirely even.In reality,the stress concentration is inevitable,so we have to evaluate the uniformity of stress to get a result with less error.

A path is defined along the direction of diame?ter at the ice-substrate interface,as drawn in Fig.6.The von-mises stress is extracted along this path and the result is depicted in the figure.It can be ob?served that the stress at the ice edge,especially in the direction close to the loading,is distinctly higher than that of the central zone due to stress concentra?tion.

Fig.6 Von-mises stress distribution at interface along diam?eter direction

The standard deviation of the stresses at all points on the path is used as a criterion for judging the uniformity of the stresses.From Fig.7,it can be observed that the standard deviation descended with the increase in the height of iceHand the loading heighthand a decrease in the radius of icer.This shows that a more homogeneous stress distribution exists at the interface.Here,the loading force also changes with the radius.

Fig.7 Effect of loading location,ice height and radius on standard deviation

In addition,the effect of the change in the ap?plied force from push to pull is studied on the unifor?mity of the stress.Fig.8 demonstrates that there is no significant difference between pushing and pull?ing.

Fig.8 Effect of push and pull on standard deviation

2.3 Analysis of strength

Before the ice is pushed off the substrate,the stress at the interface exceeds the strength limit,which causes cracks and even breakage of the ice.This phenomenon occurs due to the stress concen?tration and it affects the measurement results seri?ously.To avoid this problem,the maximum vonmises stress is compared with the allowable stress of ice,which is determined to be 20 MPa from Ref.[16].

It can be seen from Fig.9 thatris high andHis low(about 25 mm and 10 mm,respectively),when the maximum von-mises stress surpasses the allowable stress.This is applicable to any case,no matter whathis.Therefore,it is advisable to avoid the simultaneous existence of ice with a large radius and low height.

Fig.9 Effect of ice height and radius on the maximum vonmises stress

3 Experiments

The test platform shown in Fig.1 is built in a cold chamber.The radius and height of ice and the loading location are chosen according to the compre?hensive results,taking all three factors in Section 3 into consideration.The specific values are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Selected parameters for experimental validation

The adhesive shear strength at different sub?strate temperatures is investigated by experiments.In this investigation,the ice is frozen by pouring wa?ter into the mold instead of the accumulation of the supercooled water droplets.The reason is that fro?zen ice is more regular and better for exploring the effect of different factors on adhesion.Although there are differences in physical properties of frozen ice and impact ice themselves,the experimental re?sults for frozen ice are meaningful because their ad?hesion behavior is similar under the same substrate and environment.Fig.10 demonstrates the change in the force sensor during the experiment.Before the contact of the probe and the mold,the reading is ze?ro.When the probe starts to push the mold and ice,a rise is noted.At the moment of the detachment of ice,the indication decreases to near zero at once.The maximum value in this process is the adhesion force,which is substituted in Eq.(1)to calculate the shear strength.After the ice is shed off,it is ob?served that the bottom of the ice is totally flat with?out any crack.

Fig.10 Indication of force transducer during experiments

The results of shear strength are shown in Fig.11.With a decrease in the substrate tempera?ture,the shear strength correspondingly declines.There is enough time for the water to penetrate the micro-structures of the surface,when the substrate temperature is high.However,the water immediate?ly freezes,as the aluminum plate becomes colder.When the substrate temperature gradually decreas?es,the interface transites from Wenzel-state to Cassie-state[17].The former means that the surfaces are filled with water or ice and the shear strength in?creases at the same time.In contrast,the adhesion strength is expected to decrease due to the reduced contact area between the ice and the substrate under the Cassie-state.

Fig.11 Effect of substrate temperature on shear strength and comparison with literatures

In this test,the relative standard deviation of the measured ice shear strength is 2% in average,suggesting that the method and experimental equip?ment provide results with good repeatability and pre?cision for the ice adhesion measurements.Compar?ing the data obtained in this study with Refs.[6,18],it can be found that the trend is similar,but the absolute value consists a certain error.The exis?tence of the error is mainly because the icing condi?tions and substrates are not exactly the same.It is impossible to make a perfect comparison,while matching all the important variables across the earli?er studies,since many of critical variables are not re?ported.Nonetheless,the similar tendency and re?peatability prove that the experiment results in this investigation are credible.

4 Conclusions

The present study envisages the evaluation of the stress at the ice-substrate interface to guide the design of experimental set-ups and improve the mea?surement accuracy of shear strength using the finite element analysis method followed by an experimen?tal validation of the simulated results.The conclu?sions of the study are as follows:

(1)In order to reduce the peeling stress at the ice-substrate interface,it is necessary to decrease the loading height and increase the height of ice.The ice radius of about 20 mm is found to be most appropriate from the FEA setup.

(2)Increased loading height and ice height and smaller ice radius enhance the stress uniformity at the interface.

(3)Simultaneous existence of the ice with an increased radius and low height of more than 25 mm and less than 10 mm,respectively,results in crack?ing and even breakage of the ice.

(4)Ice with a height of 25 mm and a radius of 20 mm,and a loading height of 9 mm is adopted in experimental setup to achieve an accurate measure?ment.Experimental results show that the adhesion shear strength decreases with a reduction in the tem?perature of the aluminum substrate.A good agree?ment of the results with the previous reports and high repeatability demonstrate that the FEA of stress at the ice-substrate and the experimental setup in this investigation can contribute in the correct measurement of the shear strength.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 精久久久久无码区中文字幕| 久久综合九色综合97网| 91麻豆国产精品91久久久| 五月婷婷亚洲综合| 亚洲美女久久| 狠狠色狠狠综合久久| 欧美精品xx| 日韩小视频在线观看| 毛片视频网址| 国产成人一区免费观看| 国产香蕉一区二区在线网站| 99国产在线视频| 九九香蕉视频| 亚洲国产清纯| 99视频国产精品| 激情午夜婷婷| 99re在线观看视频| yjizz视频最新网站在线| 99热最新网址| 免费xxxxx在线观看网站| 好吊日免费视频| 在线免费无码视频| 欧美精品伊人久久| 日韩精品免费在线视频| 国产在线精品99一区不卡| 国产精品福利一区二区久久| 99偷拍视频精品一区二区| 激情六月丁香婷婷| 性做久久久久久久免费看| 国产真实乱子伦视频播放| 啪啪永久免费av| 国产在线视频欧美亚综合| 无码日韩人妻精品久久蜜桃| 97国产成人无码精品久久久| 久久精品国产免费观看频道 | 人人91人人澡人人妻人人爽| 亚洲,国产,日韩,综合一区| 黄色污网站在线观看| 女人18一级毛片免费观看| 亚洲无限乱码| 国产主播一区二区三区| 嫩草影院在线观看精品视频| 欧美激情福利| 国产91视频免费观看| 亚洲妓女综合网995久久| 久久国产黑丝袜视频| 成人午夜亚洲影视在线观看| 99精品视频在线观看免费播放| 2020国产精品视频| 青青久在线视频免费观看| 国产va欧美va在线观看| 欧美五月婷婷| 无码人中文字幕| 国产91无码福利在线| 日韩国产精品无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲色中色| 日韩无码黄色网站| 亚洲精品爱草草视频在线| 色精品视频| 亚洲经典在线中文字幕| 久草视频精品| 波多野结衣第一页| av在线5g无码天天| 色综合五月婷婷| 亚洲日本中文字幕天堂网| 亚洲色成人www在线观看| 亚洲日韩第九十九页| 精品视频一区二区三区在线播| 在线观看国产网址你懂的| 91在线播放免费不卡无毒| 自偷自拍三级全三级视频 | 欧美久久网| 欧美一级黄色影院| 欧美日本在线一区二区三区| 91精品国产自产91精品资源| 亚洲精品无码抽插日韩| 国产精品人人做人人爽人人添| 国产噜噜噜| 成人福利在线免费观看| 欧美区国产区| 无码一区二区三区视频在线播放| 国产av无码日韩av无码网站|