999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

A universal bifurcation mechanism arising from progressive hydroelastic waves

2022-04-13 04:07:36ZhnWng

Zhn Wng , b , ?

a Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

b School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10 0 049, China

Keywords:Nonlinear wave Supercritical bifurcation Hydroelastic wave Wavepacket

ABSTRACT A unidirectional, weakly dispersive nonlinear model is proposed to describe the supercritical bifurcation arising from hydroelastic waves in deep water. This model equation, including quadratic, cubic, and quartic nonlinearities, is an extension of the famous Whitham equation. The coefficients of the nonlinear terms are chosen to match with the key properties of the full Euler equations, precisely, the associated cubic nonlinear Schr?dinger equation and the amplitude of the solitary wave at the bifurcation point. It is shown that the supercritical bifurcation, rich with Stokes, solitary, generalized solitary, and dark solitary waves in the vicinity of the phase speed minimum, is a universal bifurcation mechanism. The newly developed model can capture the essential features near the bifurcation point and easily be generalized to other nonlinear wave problems in hydrodynamics.

It is well known that there exist two types of solitary waves in water waves, namely gravity solitary waves in shallow water and gravity-capillary solitary waves in deep water, and their bifurcation mechanisms are very different. Gravity solitary waves in shallow water, which exist above the phase speed maximum, decay monotonically in the direction of wave propagation and can be approximated by the sech-squared solitons of the celebrated Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation. However, gravity-capillary solitary waves in deep water, which exist below the phase speed minimum, feature oscillatory decaying tails and bifurcate from infinitesimal periodic waves [3,4] . Akylas [3] elucidated that the envelopes of gravity-capillary solitary waves can be well described by the nonlinear Schr?dinger (NLS) equation with cubic nonlinearity. Therefore, these waves are usually called wavepacket solitary waves in the literature. Akylas also gave the condition for wavepacket solitary waves: a phase speed extremum achieved at a non-zero wavenumber and a focusing cubic NLS equation at this point.

However, Laget and Dias in 1997 computed interfacial capillarygravity solitary waves between two semi-infinite fluids. They showed that when the density ratio of the upper to lower fluids is greater than 0.283, wavepacket solitary waves still exist; however,the branch does not bifurcate from infinitesimal periodic waves [ 8 ].Dias and his collaborators [1,6] conducted the normal form analysis. They found that the cubic NLS equation is of defocusing type at the minimum of the phase speed in this situation. Therefore, a further asymptotic expansion needs to be carried out, such that the cubic-quintic NLS equation can explain the existence of these unusual solutions. This fact indicates that the focusing NLS equation is not necessary for wavepacket solitary waves.

Fig. 1. Speed-amplitude bifurcation diagram of hydroelastic waves near the phase speed minimum c min = 1 . 3247 (vertical dotted line). The solutions are computed in the full Euler equations with the Kirchhoff-Love plate model. The amplitude is defined as ( max η ?min η) / 2 , where η is the wave profile. The uppermost curve is a branch of bright solitary waves for c < c min (solid red line) and generalized solitary waves for c > c min (dashed red line) which are distinguished from one another at the point (1.3247,0.9370)(labeled with a pentagram). The branches originating at c min are periodic Stokes solutions (dotted red line) and dark solitary waves (black circles). Typical profiles for bright solitary wave (left), generalized solitary wave (upper right), dark solitary wave (lower right), and multi-packet bright solitary wave (upper middle) are plotted.

Based on the Kirchhoff-Love plate theory, P ?ar ?au and Dias in 2002 investigated hydroelastic solitary waves, which deal with the interaction between moving loads and deformable sheets that have wide usage in marine structures and sea transport [13,14] . Their analysis showed that there exists a critical depthHcwhere the associated cubic NLS at the phase speed minimum changes the type.Milewski et al. in 2011 revisited the problem and found that even though small-amplitude solitary waves are not predicted to exist in deep water by standard perturbation analyses due to the defocusing nature of the NLS equation, solitary waves with finite amplitude do exist in the full Euler equations, a phenomenon similar to interfacial capillary-gravity waves. Taking advantage of the novel numerical scheme, Milewski et al. [12] continued the branch to explore the bifurcation mechanism of these large-amplitude solitary waves. It is shown in Fig. 1 that they occur along a branch of generalized solitary waves that itself bifurcates from periodic waves of finite amplitude. We call this new bifurcation mechanics the ‘supercritical bifurcation’ since the branch first grows in the supercritical regime until a turning point that leads it to the subcritical regime. On the other hand, Milewski et al. in 2013 computed dark solitary waves predicted by the defocusing NLS equation whose envelope approaches a non-zero constant state in the far field and decreases to zero at the origin (see the embedded image in the bottom right corner of Fig. 1 ). The branch of dark solitary waves in hydroelastic waves stems from the bifurcation point with zero amplitude and also features a turning point. If one traces the upper branch by decreasing wave speed, traveling-wave solutions become multi-packet bright solitary waves once the wave speed reaches the subcritical regime. In summary, the bifurcation of deep-water hydroelastic waves near the critical speed, rich with Stokes, solitary, generalized solitary, and dark solitary waves, is of a novel type. This type of bifurcation was also found later in other hydrodynamic problems, including interfacial capillary-gravity waves[16] , electrohydrodynamic surface waves under a vertical electric field [9] , and hydroelastic waves with constant vorticity [7] , indicating its universal property. Though this new bifurcation mechanism was numerically found in the full Euler equations under various situations, it is still necessary to propose a simplified model like the KdV equation to gravity waves in shallow water and the cubic NLS equation to gravity-capillary waves in deep water.

To study the stability and dynamics of capillary-gravity waves in deep water, Akers and Milewski (2009) [17] proposed a reduced model that generalized the famous Whitham equation (see Ref. for example). They expanded the linear dispersion relation near the phase speed minimum and fixed the coefficient of the quadratic nonlinearity by matching the coefficient of the cubic nonlinearity in the associated NLS equation. This model was further generalized to include forcing and viscosity to validate the laboratory experiments on symmetric and asymmetric shedding of capillary-gravity lumps [5,10] . Motivated by the work of Akers and Milewski [2] , we in this paper extend their idea via introducing cubic and quartic nonlinear terms to acquire more degrees of freedom, and hence achieve the defocusing NLS equation and mimic the new bifurcation. The newly proposed model is simple enough and can capture the main features of the bifurcation mechanism. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. The detailed derivations of the model equation and the associated NLS equation are described. Then, the numerical results for both two- and three-dimensional problems are presented and discussed.

whereηis the surface elevation andHis the Hilbert transform.We introduce quadratic, cubic, and quartic nonlinearities to complete the equation, yielding It is apparent that if we only include the quadratic nonlinear termηηxas done in Ref. [2] , then the defocusing NLS equation cannot be expected.

It is challenging to derive the cubic-quintic NLS equation from the full Euler equations. We do not attempt to derive the higherorder NLS equation from the primitive equations or the Whitham type model. Instead, we fix the parameterγnumerically by matching the amplitude of the solitary wave at the bifurcation point (i.e.,the pentagram in Fig. 1 ). It turns out thatγ≈0.6534 for this specific problem.

We compute progressive solutions to Eq. (4) based on the standard pseudo-spectral method and the Newton iteration. Assumeη(x,t)=η(x?ct), wherecis the translating speed, and hence the governing equation takes the form

where the unknown coefficientsansatisfyingan=a?nare real for symmetric solutions, andLis the length of the computational domain discretized by 2N+ 1 equally distributed grid points. By substituting Eq. (9) into Eq. (8) and projecting the resultant equation onto each element of the basis e i 2πnξ/Lforn= 0,1,2,···,N,one obtainsN+ 1 nonlinear algebraic equations, where the Hilbert transform and derivatives are computed by using the Fourier multipliers. The translating speedcis either prescribed or considered an unknown and solved by adding an extra equation to the discretized system (usually by specifying the wave amplitude which is defined as(maxη?minη)/ 2 ). The solution is considered to converge when thel∞?norm of the residual error is less than 10?10.The bifurcation curves are computed by straightforward numerical continuation in a chosen parameter (usually the speed, unless a turning point is reached).

As the system is forced by a load moving with constant speed,the solution may reach a steady state in the moving frame when the forcing speed is in a suitable range. To compute these steady solutions, we use the pressure distributionp(ξ)=εe?ξ2/9, whereεis a parameter that controls the peak amplitude of the applied pressure, and the results are qualitatively similar for other fully localized distributions. Two representative cases are shown in Fig. 2 forε= 0.02 (solid blue line) andε= 0.1 (solid green line).The results agree well with the full Euler computations shown in Ref. [11] . The existence of the moving pressure breaks the symmetry of the bifurcation, with the upper branch being the small perturbation of bright/generalized solitary waves and the lower branch being the small perturbation of the free stream. For large forcing (ε= 0.1 ), there is a gap between the branch of steady solutions and the bifurcation point, which is termed the ‘transcritical regime’. This range of gap will lead to interesting time-dependent dynamics. When the large pressure distribution moves with speed in this range, there is neither a steady forced solution nor a linear mechanism to radiate energy away. Therefore the energy accumulates within the forced region and releases once in the form of solitary waves as the amplitude reaches a certain level. Besides the periodic shedding of solitary waves due to large forcing, another striking phenomenon is the non-existence of transcritical regime for small forcing, indicating that no large responses can be generated as relatively low-mass vehicles moving close tocmin. This is very different from the case of pure gravity waves forced by a moving ship, where the transcritical regime exists regardless of the amplitude of the applied pressure. As shown in Fig. 3 a, similar results can be obtained for forced elevation waves (i.e.,ε= ?0.2 for large forcing andε= ?0.02 for small forcing), which were not observed in Ref. [11] .

Fig. 2. ( a ) Speed-amplitude bifurcation diagram of depression waves near the phase speed minimum c min = 1 . 3247 (vertical dotted line). The amplitude is defined as( max η ?min η) / 2 . The forced solutions are shown by solid blue and green lines, respectively, for large and small pressure distributions. The free solution branches originating at c min are periodic Stokes waves (magenta circles) and dark solitary waves (solid black line). The generalized solitary waves (dashed red line) and bright depression solitary waves (downward pointing triangles) appear along the branchof periodicwaves. (b) Atypical profile for bright solitary wave ( c = 1 . 3 ). ( c ) Typical profiles forgeneralized solitary wave ( c = 1 . 331 ) computed in the domains with lengths62 ×π(solid blue line) and 82 × π (dotted redline). ( d ) Typical profiles for dark solitary wave( c = 1 . 33 ) computed in the domains with lengths 103 × π (solid blue line) and 123 × π (dotted red line), respectively; the envelope (dotted black lines) are the NLS prediction. ( e ) A typical profile of multi-packet solitary wave ( c = 1 . 3187 ) arising along the branch of dark solitary waves.

Fig. 3. ( a ) Speed-amplitude bifurcation diagram of elevation waves near the phase speed minimum c min = 1 . 3247 (vertical dotted line). The amplitude is defined as ( max η ?min η) / 2 . The forced solutions are shown by solid blue and green lines, respectively, for large and small pressure distributions. The free solution branches originating at c min are periodic Stokes waves (magenta circles) and dark solitary waves (solid black line). The generalized solitary waves (dashed red line) and bright elevation solitary waves(upward pointing triangles) appear along the branch of periodic waves. ( b ) A typical profile for bright solitary wave ( c = 1 . 3 ). ( c ) Typical profiles for generalized solitary wave( c = 1 . 331 ) computed in the domains with lengths 62 ×π (solid blue line) and 82 × π (dotted red line). ( d ) Typical profiles for dark solitary wave ( c = 1 . 33 ) computed in the domains with lengths 103 ×π (solid blue line) and 123 × π (dotted red line), respectively; the envelope (dotted black lines) are the NLS prediction. ( e ) A typical profile of multi-packet solitary wave ( c = 1 . 318 ) arising along the branch of dark solitary waves.

We now turn to the branch of free dark solitary waves. The defocusing nature of the cubic NLS equation for the present problem predicts the existence of dark solitary waves bifurcating from infinitesimal periodic waves. The dark soliton solution for Eq. (6) takes the form

whereΩis an arbitrary positive constant. For the free-surface profile, to leading order, one obtains

Fig. 4. ( a ) Speed-amplitude bifurcation diagram for free depression lumps (downward pointing triangles), generalized lumps (dashed red line), and periodic waves (pink circles). ( b ) Typical profile of depression lump at c = 1 . 3 . ( c ) Typical profile of generalized depression lump at c = 1 . 3336 .

It is also possible to generalize Eq. (4) to the three-dimensional hydroelastic wave problem. Let thex-axis be the wave propagation direction, and they-axis be the horizontal transverse direction. Following Ref. [2] , we expand the linear dispersion relation about(±k?,0)and continue to use the existing nonlinear terms by assuming unidirectional wave propagation with slight inhomogeneity in the transverse direction. One eventually obtains

The underlying ‘2+1’ NLS equation for Eq. (12) is of defocusing type, which rules out small-amplitude lumps (i.e., spatially confined traveling waves in three dimensions) in Eq. (12) . However,as shown in Ref. [16] for interfacial capillary-gravity waves, lump solutions can still exist in a fully nonlinear model in this situation but bifurcate from a non-zero amplitude. In the subsequent computations, we seek lump solutions with symmetry in bothx-andy-directions in Eq. (12) based on the standard pseudo-spectral method similar to Eq. (9) (the details of the numerical scheme are omitted, and the interested readers are referred to Refs. [2,16] for reference). The bifurcation diagrams and typical profiles of lumps are shown in Figs. 4 a, 4 b, 5 a and 5 b. As indicated by the defocusing NLS equation, no small-amplitude lumps can be found below the minimum of the phase speed. The key observation is that both elevation and depression lumps, which feature oscillatory decaying tails in the propagation direction but monotonic decaying tails in the transverse direction, are found to exist at finite amplitude. However, as the translating speed increases and reaches the supercritical regime, the resonance mechanism results in generalized lumps akin to a lump embedded in a periodic plane wave (see Figs. 4 c and 5 c). The branches of generalized lumps ultimately join in the branch of Stokes waves; see the bifurcation curves in Fig. 4 a for depression waves and Fig. 5 a for elevation waves, similar to their two-dimensional counterparts.

In the present paper, we have proposed a phenomenological model for describing the bifurcation mechanism of deep-water hydroelastic waves by generalizing the Whitham equation. The fundamental idea is to fix the coefficients of the quadratic and cubic terms by matching the cubic NLS equation derived from the model with that from the full Euler equations and determine the coefficient of the quartic nonlinearity by matching the amplitude of the solitary wave at the bifurcation point. The newly proposed model can capture the primary features of the bifurcation mechanism in the vicinity of the phase speed minimum.This approach can easily be generalized to include the effects due to inertia, vorticity, and viscoelasticity for the problem of moving loads on ice sheets. More generally, this idea can be extended to other nonlinear wave problems in fluid dynamics, such as interfacial gravity-capillary waves, surface waves with constant vorticity,electrocapillary-gravity waves, etc.

Fig. 5. ( a ) Speed-amplitude bifurcation diagram for free elevation lumps (upward pointing triangles), generalized lumps (dashed red line), and periodic waves (pink circles).( b ) Typical profile of elevation lump at c = 1 . 3 . ( c ) Typical profile of generalized elevation lump at c = 1 . 3336 .

Fig. 6. ( a ) Solution diagrams for free elevation waves (solid dark line) and periodic waves (dotted red line) in the quadratic-cubic-quintic model. The free-surface amplitude η(0) is plotted against wave speed. ( b ) Bright solitary waves at c = 1 . 26 corresponding to the intersection points from top to bottom between the left-hand vertical dashed line and the elevation branch shown in ( a ). ( c ) Generalized solitary waves at c = 1 . 33 corresponding to the intersection points from top to bottom between the right-hand vertical dashed line and the elevation branch shown in ( a ).

Finally, we should point out that much remains to be improved for the Whitham type models. Particularly, the selection of nonlinear terms is artificial in Eq. (4) to some extent, though the approach adopted in the paper has certain rationality and feasibility.For example, we can choose quadratic, cubic, and quintic nonlinear terms and fix the coefficients based on the method mentioned. It is not difficult to obtain

whereαandβare the same as Eq. (4) , andγ~ ≈?0.6935 . This model can capture most features near the bifurcation point; however, in contrast to the full Euler equations, the branch of dark solitary waves in this model does not lead to multi-packet bright solitary waves. Nevertheless, the quadratic-cubic-quintic model shows good agreement with the Euler equations in some other aspects away from the bifurcation point. For example, the elevation branch in Eq. (13) exhibits the characteristic ‘snake-like behavior’ shown in Fig. 6 a: the speed-amplitude bifurcation curves show a zigzag behavior with multiple turning points. The most striking phenomenon is that the bifurcation curve is trans-regional.As it reaches the supercritical regime, non-decaying wavetrains appear on wave profiles; see the comparison between bright solitary waves ( Fig. 6 b) and generalized solitary waves ( Fig. 6 c). This phenomenon was also observed for hydroelastic waves with constant vorticity [7] . Overall, it is of great interest to find a systematic/rigorous method to choose nonlinear terms for the Whitham type equations, which we leave for future investigations.

Declaration of Competing Interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript submitted.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.11772341 and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. XDB22040203.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 97久久人人超碰国产精品| 亚洲精品视频免费看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区蜜芽| 亚洲成av人无码综合在线观看| 性喷潮久久久久久久久| 六月婷婷精品视频在线观看| 国国产a国产片免费麻豆| 国产天天色| 欧美精品在线视频观看| 色悠久久综合| 日本国产精品| 国产v精品成人免费视频71pao | 国产成人毛片| 免费不卡视频| 亚洲精品国产综合99| 人妻21p大胆| 国产丝袜丝视频在线观看| 日本免费福利视频| 久久久久国色AV免费观看性色| 波多野结衣二区| 精品国产福利在线| 在线观看精品自拍视频| 色综合久久久久8天国| 久久久久青草大香线综合精品| 在线观看国产精品一区| 国产欧美精品午夜在线播放| 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线| 国产精品污视频| 精品久久国产综合精麻豆| 国产在线98福利播放视频免费| 精品国产毛片| 久久中文字幕av不卡一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产无码AV| 国产午夜一级淫片| 依依成人精品无v国产| 亚洲一级毛片免费观看| 亚洲人成影视在线观看| 亚洲天堂自拍| 日韩精品视频久久| 国产免费久久精品99re不卡| 在线播放国产一区| 亚洲日韩在线满18点击进入| 成人免费视频一区二区三区 | 99精品在线视频观看| 亚洲精品手机在线| 欧美激情二区三区| 99视频免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲性日韩精品一区二区| 国产麻豆aⅴ精品无码| 国产午夜看片| 久久精品这里只有国产中文精品| 亚洲天堂日韩av电影| www.亚洲一区| 99er这里只有精品| 谁有在线观看日韩亚洲最新视频| 国产喷水视频| 国产成人永久免费视频| 亚洲天堂免费观看| 伊人福利视频| 四虎国产在线观看| 欧美日韩精品综合在线一区| 亚洲国产综合自在线另类| 99久久亚洲综合精品TS| 91国内在线视频| 亚洲第一黄色网址| 亚洲国产成人自拍| 日韩av高清无码一区二区三区| 亚洲天天更新| 免费a在线观看播放| 免费看a毛片| 性欧美精品xxxx| 亚洲国产成人久久精品软件| 国产精品三级专区| 五月天综合网亚洲综合天堂网| 日韩小视频在线播放| 国产精品一区二区久久精品无码| 亚洲色图综合在线| 日韩精品毛片| 99视频在线免费看| 国产国语一级毛片在线视频| 欧美在线三级|