Corrigendum to “Optimal placement of two soil soundings for rectangular footings” [J.Rock Mech.Geotech.Eng.13 (2021) 603-611]

Marcin Chwa?a

Department of Geotechnology, Hydro Technology, and Underground and Hydro Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroc?aw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzez˙e Wyspian′skiego 27, Wroc?aw, 50-370, Poland

In the paper of Chwa?a (2021), a bug in the used numerical implementation was found.It concerns one of the covariance matrix coefficients that was incorrectly updated during the simulation process.As a consequence for some fluctuation scales, different bearing capacity standard deviations are obtained;however,the bug had a very limited impact on the found optimal borehole placement.Therefore,the conclusions given in the paper are still valid.The author has re-analyzed all numerical examples presented in the paper and will provide the results on an individual request.In Fig.1, corrected Figs.5, 9, 7 and 11 in the original paper are shown.

Fig.1.Optimal borehole locations as a function of horizontal fluctuation scale θh and foundation length a for (a) Gaussian (corrected Fig.5) and (b) Markovian (corrected Fig.9)covariance functions.Optimal borehole locations in dimensionless coordinates obtained for four vertical fluctuation scales for (c) Gaussian (corrected Fig.7) and (d) Markovian(corrected Fig.11) covariance functions.