999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Study on Coaxiality Measurement System of Compound Gear Shaft Based on Non?contact Optic

2021-07-15 09:58:28,*,,,

,*,,,

1.College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,P.R.China;2.State?Owned Jinjiang Machine Factory,Chengdu 610043,P.R.China

Abstract: Aiming at the shortcomings of traditional contact measurement methods such as low measurement efficiency,high cost and low accuracy,a non-contact optical measurement method based on the laser displacement sensor is proposed. According to the relevant regulations of the coaxiality error evaluation standard and the structural characteristics of the compound gear shaft,we have designed and built a set of supporting software system as well as a hardware test platform.In this paper,the distance difference threshold and scale threshold methods are used to eliminate outlier data. The least squares circle is selected to calculate the center of the circle and the minimum containment cylinder axis method is used as the reference axis of the composite gear shaft. Compensated by the standard step shaft calibration,the coaxiality error of the composite gear shaft can be measured to be within 0.01 mm in less than two minutes. The range value of the multi-section measurement test is 0.065 mm. The average coaxiality error is?0.476 mm.

Key words:compound gear shaft;non-contact measurement;laser displacement sensor;coaxiality;measuring system

0 Introduction

Due to various uncertain factors,there is al?ways a certain error between the actual size of the fi?nal product and the ideal size,which results in the difference between the geometric features and the ideal situation in the machining process. Concentrici?ty is a type of position error. In some occasions of rotary motion,part of the reference is eccentric.The mechanical transmission device will generate vi?bration and noise which will directly damage the de?vice more seriously.

Traditional coaxiality detection methods for the outer contour of shaft parts mainly include the rota?tion axis method,coordinate method,tip method,simulation method,etc. The common feature of most traditional measurement methods is that the da?ta points are collected by contacting the probe with the surface of the part to be measured. Whether the parts meet the requirements depends on the measure?ment data obtained according to the change in the reading of the indicator. These are all contact mea?surement methods,which can achieve high accuracy but are too slow for complex parts. The new noncontact measurement methods mainly include laser ranging method[1]and processing photos through ma?chine learning to get coaxiality. The development of coaxial measurement technology in foreign countries is relatively early with more mature measurement methods and high precision measurement equip?ments. Kühnel et al.[2]designed a non-contact round?ness and cylindricity automatic measuring device.They reduced the effects of factors such as eccentrici?ty,tilt,and swing of the turntable on the measure?ment results to be within 10 nm while the measure?ment speed has been greatly improved by the auto?mated measurement process. Jun et al.[3]conducted research on the measurement of coaxiality and level?ness between bolt holes during the assembly of the main wing of the T-50 supersonic advanced trainer aircraft. The quantitative measurement of the coaxi?ality and levelness error between two bolt holes was achieved through the analysis of reflected polarized light. Li et al.[4]presented a new contactless mea?surement prototype based on a laser displacement sensor that automatically evaluated the rolling per?formance of the sharp shaft. They applied laser dis?placement sensors to determine that changes in the size of the roots were related to surface residual stress and microhardness.Domestic coaxial measure?ment technology is still in the research stage,but there have been major breakthroughs in recent years.Wang et al.[5]proposed a method for measuring the coaxiality of piston rods based on machine vision technology to solve the problems of low accuracy and low efficiency of coaxiality error measurement during the manufacturing process of piston rods in 2015. And high-precision coaxiality measurement has been realized based on genetic algorithm. In 2017,Yan Minwei,a researcher of Xi’an Jiaotong University and others designed a coaxial detection device based on a two-dimensional laser displace?ment sensor to detect coaxiality errors in bearing holes of the bridge shell of the axle reducer[6].

The bevel gear-spline compound gear shaft is a relatively common type of composite shaft parts which consists of spline,cylindrical shaft and bevel gear.The real object is shown in Fig.1.

Fig.1 Bevel gear-spline compound gear shaft

At present,the coaxiality measurement meth?od of the bevel gear-spline compound gear shaft part is also contact. The measurement tool is used to clamp the part rotated manually by the inspector.The coaxiality is calculated based on the data ob?tained from the contact between the probe and the surface of the part. The measurement results ob?tained by using the above measurement methods can be relatively easily affected by various factors such as measurement devices,environmental disturbanc?es and manual operations,which lead to lower accu?racy of the final measurement results and more time waste. According to the research experience in the field of form and position error measurement,we have designed and built a set of coaxiality measure?ment experiments platform based on laser ranging technology with laser displacement sensors to mea?sure the coaxiality of multi-specification bevel gearspline compound gear shafts[7]. We put forward a non-contact optical measurement method to obtain the spatial geometric profile information of parts[8].Laser scanning of complex parts for precise distanc?es avoids probe measurement inaccuracies. The part is driven by a motor to rotate so as to obtain more stable data. Finally,the coaxiality error of the bevel gear relative to the spline for one compound gear shaft is evaluated,realizing the fast and accurate measurement of coaxiality.

1 Test Principle

The Chinese machinery industry standard“JB/T 7557—1994 coaxiality error detection”[9]has ex?plained the basic measurement method of coaxiality in detail. The overall measurement process can be summarized as the following four steps in Fig.2.

Fig.2 Basic process of coaxial error measurement

Based on the above-mentioned basic measure?ment method of coaxiality error,we use non-con?tact laser displacement sensors to obtain the informa?tion of each measurement element on the part to be tested by measuring the distance from the sensor to the surface of the part. The measurement scheme is shown in Fig.3.

Fig.3 Schematic diagram of coaxial optical measurement scheme

During the measurement,the two laser dis?placement sensors measure the above spline part and the bevel gear part respectively while the com?pound gear shaft rotates at a constant speedω. The distances from the sensors to the highest points of the two tooth top circles are within the range of the respective sensors which can move along the axis of the part to be measured. The proposed basic mea?surement process is shown as follows.

(1)Look for multiple sections to be measured,which are perpendicular to the rotation center axis in the spline part of the compound gear shaft.

(2)For a certain section,a series of distance values of measurement points on the section are ob?tained by a laser displacement sensor during a part of the rotation of the part.

(3)After data processing,the measured series of distance values are converted into the profile in?formation of the section under the measurement co?ordinate system.

(4)Process the profile information of the sec?tion to obtain the coordinates of the center point of the section to be measured in the measurement coor?dinate system.

(5)Perform the above processing on the other sections of the spline part to obtain the coordinates of the center points of all the tested sections of the spline part.

(6)The coordinates of the center point of each section of the spline part are processed to obtain the reference axis equation of the coaxiality error evalua?tion.

(7)Perform operations similar to steps(2—5)on the bevel gear part to obtain the positions of the center points of all the sections to be measured.

(8)According to the coaxiality evaluation criteri?on,determine the coaxiality error value of the bevel gear part relative to the reference axis of the spline part.

2 Measurement System Construc?tion

2.1 Construction of hardware platform of mea?surement system

The overall structural design of the test system hardware platform is shown schematically in Fig.4.The test hardware platform can be divided into three parts:Driving module,positioning module and sensing and measuring module. Among them,the driving module is responsible for driving the part to be tested,whose positioning and supporting depend on the positioning module. The sensing and measur?ing module is responsible for measuring the distance of the surface of the part and sending the measure?ment data to the industrial computer.

Fig.4 Overall structure of the test platform

The positioning module and the sensing and measuring module are shown in Fig.5. The overall structure of the positioning module includes the top tailstock,lifting support device and linear motion component. The lifting support device provides the main supporting force for the part to be tested,which is assisted by the top tailstock. Both of them are in?stalled on the linear motion component. The position can be adjusted in the direction of the axis of the rota?tion center to meet the measurement requirements of parts of different length specifications. The sensing and measuring module mainly includes laser displace?ment sensors,one-dimensional translation stages,gantry brackets,and linear motion components. The triangle measurement principle of the laser displace?ment sensor is mainly using diffuse reflection mea?surement mode to obtain the distance[10-12].

Fig.5 Positioning module and sensor measurement module

2.2 Construction of software module of mea?surement system

The host computer software of the measure?ment system is divided into five modules:User management module,system setting module,sys?tem calibration module,part measurement module and data processing module. The overall structure design is shown in Fig.6.

Fig.6 Overall structure design of the host computer software

The software test flow chart of the coaxial opti?cal measurement system can be summarized as shown in Fig.7. After entering the measurement sys?tem,the system calibration is carried out firstly and then the part is measured. Finally,the measurement data is processed to determine whether the part is qualified.

Fig.7 Test flow chart

2.3 System calibration

Due to installation errors,the laser is not verti?cally hit on the axis of the standard part,so we elim?inate errors through system calibration. The calibra?tion principle is shown in Fig.8. Assuming that the distance from the laser displacement sensor to the rotating center axis isd,and the offset distance of the sensor in the horizontal direction is ΔX. For a single laser displacement sensor,we use the axle di?ameters to calibrate the step axes ofRandr. After measurement,the average distance obtained by the sensor ishRandhr. We can get the distance relation?ship as follows

Fig.8 Principle of step axis measurement

After calibration,the radius of the section cir?cle is shown as

wheredirepresents the distance measured after cal?ibration andrithe radius of the actual measured part.

2.4 Data processing and coaxiality assessment

By analyzing the positive profile data of spline and bevel gear,we find that the tops,roots,and sides of the teeth are distributed continuously and evenly at data points near the central position with little fluctuation. But the data points at the junction fluctuate relatively largely leading to poor continu?ity. In order to extract the center of the circle,we use distance difference threshold and scale threshold methods to strip data. When fitting the center of the ring,we need to remove the root circle data and on?ly keep the top circle part. The plane point set con?vex package method[13]and the internal gradual ap?proximation peripheral extraction method can both eliminate the root data. By comparing the two meth?ods,the number of data retained before and after the top extract is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The retained number of data before and after processing

Obviously,approximation processing preserves valid data better. Therefore,we choose approxima?tion method to process cross-sectional profile data.The results of bevel gear data are shown in Fig.9.

Fig.9 Results of bevel gear part of the top tooth extract processing

In order to obtain the coaxiality of the part,the base axis needs to be extracted. We use four meth?ods to fit the center of the circle,which are least squares circle,minimum circumscribed circle,maxi?mum inscribed circle and minimum zone circles[14-15].After repeatedly measuring 10 sets of data for the bevel gear in Fig.10,we have found that the least squares circle fits the center of the circle with the smallest fluctuations.

Fig.10 Change curves of the bevel gear

There are three ways to process the data of the base axis,which are the minimum containment cyl?inder axis method,the least square midline method and the method of connecting head and tail center points. After comparison,we choose the minimum containment cylinder axis method to fit the base ax?is. Suppose that the axis passes through the pointO0(x0,y0,0), with the direction vectorL=(p,q,1). The distancedifrom the center pointsOi(xi,yi,zi)to the axis can be obtained by Eq.(4).Therefore,the radius of the minimum containment cylinder axis can be expressed as Eq.(5).

The particle group algorithm is selected to solve the minimum inclusive cylindrical axis at the center of each section. Eq.(5)is used as the optimi?zation target function of the particle group algorithm and the values of all parameters during the iteration are shown in Table 2. The gear shaft screening data flow and the particle group algorithm flow in the software are shown in Fig.11.

Table 2 Values of the particle group algorithm

Fig.11 Flowchart of data processing algorithm

The minimum inclusion area calculation is per?formed for each interface center point after obtaining the base axis equation. We take twice the maximum the distance from the reference axis as the coaxiality error.

3 Test and Analysis

3.1 System calibration test

The design dimension of the distance between the spline and bevel gear laser displacement sensor and the rotation center axis is 90 mm and the range of the sensor is 45—95 mm. In order to make the surface of the part to be measured within the range of the sensor,the radius of the stepped axis for cali?bration should be 0—45 mm. The actual calibration step axis is shown in Fig.12. We take their both av?erage value for each of 10 sets of calibration results of the two sensors as the final calibration result. The calibration results are shown in Table 3. After the calibration,the datariin Eq.(3)obtained from the test is the radius value of the actual part.

Table 3 System calibration test results

Fig.12 Ladder shaft for calibration

3.2 Section measurement test

3.2.1 Single?section measurement test

We use the calibrated laser displacement sensor to perform distance measurement on three sections to obtain the profile information of the section to be measured. Then we calculate the coordinates of the center point of each section profile. The operation is repeated for 10 times. After analyzing the coordinate changes of the contour center of each section for the three sections to be measured on the cylindrical part of the compound gear shaft,we calculate the circle runout error of the data points of the tooth top con?tour for each group of cross-section profile data.The 10 measurement results of the spline part and the bevel gear part are shown in Fig.13. It shows that the fluctuation of the round runout error is small among them. The calculated results of the 10 groups are all within 0.01 mm,showing good re?peatability.

Fig.13 Normal section profile center coordinate change curves of the spline part and the bevel gear part cross section

3.2.2 Multi?section measurement test

According to the axial length of the flower key part and the gear part,we look for seven sections to be measured in the flower key part with 2 mm of the cross-section spacing as well as six sections to be measured of the bevel gear part with the same sec?tion spacing for compound gear shaft parts. Then we use the calibrated two laser displacement sensors to measure the distance between the spline part and the gear part to be measured to obtain the profile in?formation of each measured section. After that the coordinates of the center point of each profile are cal?culated. According to the base axis fitting method,we calculate the minimum containment cylinder axis equation of the center point of each section of the spline part as the reference axis. Then we use the reference axis to evaluate the coaxiality error for the center points of the seven sections to be mea?sured[16]. According to the minimum inclusion area coaxiality determination criterion,we then calculate the distance from the center point of each section of the bevel gear to the reference axis and take twice the maximum distance as the coaxiality error of the part. The above measurement process is repeated to get 10 sets of measurement tests. The coaxial error measurement results are shown in Fig.14. It shows that there is a certain fluctuation in coaxiality error with the range value of 10 measurement results is 0.065 mm.

Fig.14 Curve of coaxiality error of compound gear shaft

3.3 Error analysis

By analyzing the possible influence of the hard?ware structure,data processing method and exter?nal environment of the measurement system on the coaxiality measurement process, various factors that may introduce errors into the measurement re?sults are summarized as follows.

(1)Gross errors in measurement data

The data collection process of the sensor may be affected by he disturbance of the external environ?ment which will result in outliers with large devia?tions in the cross-sectional profile of the part to be measured. Through the distance difference thresh?old and scale threshold methods,the effect of this abnormal data on subsequent data processing can be effectively removed.

(2)Errors from measurement equipment

The measurement error of the laser displace?ment sensor itself is 10 μm,which is determined by the manufacturing accuracy of the sensor. There is a gap between the roller and the rail shaft when the linear motion assembly is sliding. According to the existing experimental conditions in the laboratory,it is relatively difficult to process and assemble parts to meet the accuracy requirements of theoretical de?sign.

(3)Errors caused by data processing methods

According to the results of the single-section circle center measurement test,the normal section profile processing method is used to process the pro?file information of the section in which the particle group algorithm is used to solve the minimum con?tainment cylinder axis[17]. The initial value of each particle is random which makes the calculation re?sult error.

(4)Errors caused by external factors

Environmental factors(such as temperature,vibration,electromagnetic interference,etc) and operations(personal factors)during the measure?ment process will affect the measurement data. We try to measure in a quiet,confined environment.

3.4 Test system performance parameters

The range of the coaxial optical measurement system test platform is mainly related to the range of the laser displacement sensor and the distance from the rotation center axis to the laser displacement sen?sor. The range of the two sensors is from 45 mm to 95 mm. According to the system calibration experi?ments,the distance between the spline laser dis?placement sensor and the rotation center axis is 89.584 mm with the bevel gear laser displacement sensor and the rotation center axis is 89.663 mm.Based on the above information,a schematic dia?gram of the measurement range is shown in Fig.15.

Fig.15 Schematic diagram of measurement range

Based on the above information,the coaxial op?tical measurement test platform is built for this proj?ect.The system range is shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Measuring system range

The measurement accuracy of the measure?ment system is evaluated and analyzed based on the measurement results of 10 sets of coaxiality errors.After bringing the measurement result in Eq.(6),we get0.476 mm as the measurement result.The third place after the decimal point of the coaxial?ity error measurement value is the estimated value,meaning that the measurement result of the mea?surement system can be accurate to the second place after the decimal point.

The uncertainty evaluation and analysis of the measurement system is performed based on 10 sets of coaxiality error measurement results. After bring?ing 10 sets of measurement results in Eq.(7),we get 0.020 mm as the standard deviation of the mea?surement results. According to the Leyte criterion,no abnormal value appears in the measurement re?sults. The type A uncertainty of the measurement system isu=s=0.020 mm.

4 Conclusions

(1)This paper introduces how to measure the coaxiality of a bevel gear-spline compound gear shaft by non-contact optical measurement method.According to the measurement process and princi?ple,a measurement platform hardware as well as software platform are designed and constructed.The test flow of the entire measurement system is anylized to achieve rapid and accurate measurement and evaluation of coaxiality error.

(2)After the calibration,we get the laser off?set ?Xof the sensor relative to the standard part ax?is. The distance difference threshold and scale threshold methods are used to eliminate outliers to reduce gross errors. After approximation process?ing,the top circle data is obtained to fit the center of the cross-sectional circle. The base axis is fitted by the particle group algorithm and then we get the fi?nal coaxiality error by processing the data in the min?imum containment area.We obtain accurate coaxiali?ty error after efficient processing.

(3)In the single-section measurement test,a normal section contour center measurement test and a round runout error measurement tests are per?formed for different parts of the part to be tested.We then get the range value within 0.01 mm. In the multi-section coaxiality measurement test,the dis?tance measurement is performed between the spline part and the bevel gear part for the compound gear shaft. The coaxiality error of the bevel gear part with respect to the reference line of the spline part is from 0.45 mm to 0.50 mm. Among them,the range value is 0.065 mm. Finally,the error analysis of the measurement system is performed according to the test results.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产欧美自拍| 国产精品视频白浆免费视频| 性网站在线观看| 538国产视频| 国产Av无码精品色午夜| 91人妻日韩人妻无码专区精品| 国产人前露出系列视频| 日韩人妻无码制服丝袜视频| 亚洲精品在线91| 色婷婷天天综合在线| 无码精品福利一区二区三区| 91区国产福利在线观看午夜 | 国产91丝袜在线播放动漫| 成人亚洲天堂| 欧美成人影院亚洲综合图| 久久一本日韩精品中文字幕屁孩| 天堂成人av| 人妻精品久久无码区| 国产精品网曝门免费视频| 国产白浆在线观看| 免费毛片视频| 国产精品九九视频| 日韩AV无码一区| 午夜三级在线| 日本一区二区三区精品国产| 欧美精品二区| 丁香五月婷婷激情基地| 综合成人国产| 色婷婷成人网| 国产成人永久免费视频| 综合社区亚洲熟妇p| 国产精品99一区不卡| 在线a视频免费观看| 丝袜无码一区二区三区| 免费视频在线2021入口| 欧美日韩激情| 国产一级在线播放| 在线欧美a| 99热这里只有精品在线观看| 女人一级毛片| 亚洲人妖在线| 免费看久久精品99| 免费无码AV片在线观看国产| 久草视频中文| 亚洲香蕉在线| 一级在线毛片| 久久国产黑丝袜视频| 国产成人精品无码一区二| 欧美成人A视频| 精品视频在线观看你懂的一区| 高清国产在线| 永久免费av网站可以直接看的| 国产成人精品午夜视频'| 99999久久久久久亚洲| 国产精品私拍在线爆乳| 国产国模一区二区三区四区| 最新国产成人剧情在线播放| 成人精品视频一区二区在线| 国产三级国产精品国产普男人| 日本少妇又色又爽又高潮| 综合久久久久久久综合网| 久久久久亚洲精品成人网| 国产乱人视频免费观看| 国产成人一区二区| 亚洲黄色成人| 国产97视频在线| 自偷自拍三级全三级视频| 四虎AV麻豆| 久热这里只有精品6| 日韩毛片在线视频| 中文天堂在线视频| 日韩欧美国产中文| 日韩精品成人在线| 久久婷婷六月| 亚洲精品国产综合99| 国产成人无码久久久久毛片| 国产毛片基地| 久久综合九色综合97婷婷| 国内精品九九久久久精品| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码区| 亚洲水蜜桃久久综合网站| 欧美精品三级在线|