A Novel BEM for Modeling and Simulation of 3T Nonlinear Generalized Anisotropic Micropolar-Thermoelasticity Theory with Memory Dependent Derivative

Mohamed Abdelsabour Fahmy

1Jamoum University College,Umm Al-Qura University,Makkah,Saudi Arabia

2Faculty of Computers and Informatics,Suez Canal University New Campus,Ismailia,41522,Egypt

ABSTRACT The main aim of this paper is to propose a new memory dependent derivative(MDD)theory which called threetemperature nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity.The system of governing equations of the problems associated with the proposed theory is extremely difficult or impossible to solve analytically due to nonlinearity,MDD diffusion,multi-variable nature,multi-stage processing and anisotropic properties of the considered material.Therefore,we propose a novel boundary element method(BEM)formulation for modeling and simulation of such system.The computational performance of the proposed technique has been investigated.The numerical results illustrate the effects of time delays and kernel functions on the nonlinear three-temperature and nonlinear displacement components.The numerical results also demonstrate the validity,efficiency and accuracy of the proposed methodology.The findings and solutions of this study contribute to the further development of industrial applications and devices typically include micropolar-thermoelastic materials.

KEYWORDS Boundary element method; memory dependent derivative; three-temperature; nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity

1 Introduction

The study of thermoelastic models has recently gained growing attention due to its many applications in aerospace technologies, geophysics, aeronautics, astronautics, robotics,earthquake engineering, mining engineering, nuclear energy industry, military technologies, soil dynamics, high-energy particle accelerators and detectors, and other engineering and electronic industries [1-9].

The classical thermo-elasticity (CTE) theory of Duhamel [10] and Newman [11] has two deficiencies:the first deficiency is the heat conduction of CTE does not include any elastic term, whereas the second deficiency is that, the equation of heat conduction has infinite heat propagation velocities.In order to overcome the first deficiency, Biot [12] proposed classical coupled thermo-elasticity (CCTE).But CTE and CCTE have the second deficiency.Therefore, many generalized thermo-elasticity theories have been developed to overcome the second deficiency of CTE.Among these theories are extended thermo-elasticity (ETE) theory of Lord et al.[13], temperature-rate-dependent thermo-elasticity (TRDTE) theory of Green et al.[14-16] namely I, II and III, respectively, (where, GN theory I is based on Fourier’s law of heat conduction and identical to CTE theory, GN theory II characterizes the thermoelasticity without energy dissipation (TEWOED), and GN theory III which characterizes the thermoelasticity with energy dissipation (TEWED)).Although most thermal phenomena are practically represented using the classical Fourier thermal conductivity equation [17-22], there are a large number of applications that require the use of the nonlinear heat conduction equation, great attention has been paid to investigate of nonlinear generalized thermoelastic problems by using boundary element method [23-26].Fahmy [27] introduced the three-temperature theory in the context of nonlinear generalized thermoelasticity.

The fractional calculus is the mathematical branch that is used to study the theory and applications of derivatives and integrals of arbitrary non-integer order.Recently, this branch has emerged as an effective tool for modeling of various engineering and industrial applications [28,29].Due to the nonlocal nature of fractional order operators, they are useful for describing the memory and hereditary properties of various materials and processes.Also,the fractional calculus has drawn wide attention from the researchers of various countries in recent years due to its applications in solid mechanics, fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics,viscoelasticity, heat conduction modeling and identification, biology, food engineering, econophysics, biophysics, biochemistry, electrochemistry, electrical engineering, finance and control theory, robotics and control theory, signal and image processing, electronics, electric circuits, wave propagation, nanotechnology, flabby, oscillation, stochastic diffusion theory and wave propagation,etc.[30-32].

Several famous mathematicians have contributed to the development of fractional order calculus, where Euler mentioned interpolating between integral orders of a derivative in 1730.At that point, Laplace characterized a fractional derivative by implies of an integral in 1812.

Lacroix presented the first formula for the fractional order derivative appeared in 1819, where he introduced the nth derivative of the function y=xmas follows

In 1967, the Italian mathematician Caputo presented his fractional derivative of orderα ＞0 as

Diethelm [33] has suggested the derivative of Caputo in the form below

where f(m)is the m-th order derivative and m is an integer such that m-1＜ζ ≤m

Wang et al.[34] have introduced MDD as follows

where the first order (ζ=1) of MDD for a differentiable function f(τ)can be expressed as

Based on several practical applications, the memory effect needs weight 0 ≤K(τ-ξ)＜1 forξ∈[τ-ω,τ], so the MDD magnitude Dωf(τ)is usually smaller than f′(τ), where the kernel function (0 ≤K(τ-ξ)≤1 forξ∈[τ-ξ,τ]) Can be randomly selected over a staggered interval[τ-ω,τ], the practical kernel functions are 1, [1-(τ-ξ)] and1, 2, etc.These functions are monotonically increasing with K=0 for the past timeτ-ξand K=1 for the present timeτ.The main feature of MDD, that the real-time functional value depends also, on the past time [τ-ξ,τ].So, Dωdepends on the past time (nonlocal operator), while the integration doesn’t depend on the past time (local operator).

As a special case K(τ-ξ)≡1 we have

The above equation shows that the common derivativeis the limit of Dωas ω →0.That is,

Due to the computational difficulties in solving nonlinear generalized anisotropic thermoelastic problems, the problems become too complicated with no general analytical solution.So,numerical solutions should be implemented instead of analytical solutions to obtain the approximate solutions for such problems, one of the best of these numerical methods is the boundary element method (BEM) [35,36], which also called boundary integral equation method.BEM has been extensively used for a large variety of engineering and industrial applications.In the BEM, only the boundary of the computational domain needs to be discretized, so, it has a major advantage over domain methods which requires the whole computational domain discretization such as the finite difference method (FDM) [37-39] and finite element method(FEM) [40-42].This advantage of BEM over domain methods has significant importance for modeling of nonlinear generalized thermoelastic problems which can be implemented using BEM with little cost and less input data [43-57].Through this paper, we would like to guide the reader to this important paper of Cheng et al.[58] which narrates BEM history in a wonderful and interesting way.Sladek et al.[59-61] and Huang et al.[62] developed the boundary element formulation for micropolar thermoelasticity.

Researchers in numerical methods were only aware of the importance of FEM which could solve complex engineering problems.But now after the huge achievements of BEM and their ability to solve inhomogeneous and non-linear problems involving infinite and semi-infinite domains very efficiently, they realized the power, ease and accuracy of BEM in solving their complex problems by using a lot of software like FastBEM and BEASY.

The main aim of this paper is to propose a new MDD theory, called three-temperature nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity and propose a novel BEM technique for solving problems associated with the proposed theory.The numerical findings are graphically represented to demonstrate the impacts of the time delays and kernel functions on the total nonlinear three-temperature and nonlinear displacement components and demonstrate the validity and exactness of the suggested technique.

A brief summary of this paper is as follows:Section 1 introduces the background and provides the readers with the necessary information to books and articles for a better understanding of thermoelasticity theories, memory dependent derivative history and their applications.Section 2 describes the physical modeling of memory dependent derivative problems of threetemperature nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity.Section 3 outlines the BEM implementation for obtaining the temperature field of the considered problem.Section 4 outlines the BEM implementation for obtaining the displacement field of the considered problem.Section 5 introduces the computational performance of the proposed technique.Section 6 presents the new numerical results that describe the effects of time delays and kernel functions on the total temperature and displacement components.Section 7 outlines the significant findings of this paper.

2 Formulation of the Problem

The geometry of the considered problem is shown in Fig.1 for a structure which occupies the bounded regionthat bounded byS, whereSi (i=1,2,3,4)such thatS1+S2=S3+S4=S.

Figure 1:Geometry of the considered problem

The memory dependent derivative governing equations for three-temperature nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity theory and its problems can be expressed as follows [27]

where

The two dimensions three temperature (2D-3T) radiative heat conduction equations can be expressed as

whereσab,mij,εij,∈ij,uk,TαandTα0are the mechanical stress tensor, couple stress, strain tensor,micro-strain tensor, displacement vector, temperature and reference temperature, respectively,Cabfg(Cabfg=Cfgab=Cbafg) andβab(βab=βba) are respectively, the constant elastic moduli and stresstemperature coefficients of the anisotropic medium,Fi,Miand ωiare mass force, mass couple and micro-rotation, respectively,Jis micro-inertia coefficient, Kα (α=e,i,p)are the thermal conductivity coefficients,e,iandpdenote electron, ion and phonon, respectively, K*αis the second order tensor associated with the TEWED and TEWOED theories, Wei, Wep,ρ,cα(α=e,i,p),τand ? are the electron-ion energy coefficient, electron-phonon energy coefficient, density, specific heat capacities, time and unified parameter which introduced to consolidate all theories into a unified equations system, respectively,τ0,τ1andτ2are the relaxation times,mis a functionally graded parameter.Also,g1,g2,Ψfandδfare suitably prescribed functions,taare the tractions defined byta=σabnb,δ1jandδ2jare the Kronecker delta functions.

3 BEM Solution for Temperature Field

The 2D-3T radiative heat conduction equations mentioned above (15)-(17) coupled with electron, ion and phonon temperatures, can be expressed in the context of memory dependent derivative theory [27]

where

where

and

which can be written in memory dependent derivative form as follows

where

and

whereδij (i,j=1,2), ωα(＞0) (α=e,i and p)andK(τ-ξ)are the Kronecker delta, delay times and kernel function, respectively.

Initial and boundary conditions of 3T field can be written as

By using the fundamental solutionsthat satisfies the following differential equation

Now, by applying the technique of Fahmy [27] to (19) we can write

which, in the absence of heat sources, can be written as follows

In order to transform the domain integral of (33) into the boundary, the time derivative of temperature can be approximated as follows

wherefj(r)are known functions andaj(τ)are unknown coefficients.

Then, Eq.(33) resulted in the following boundary integral equation

where

and

By discretizing Eq.(36) and using Eq.(38), we get [46]

where Q is the heat flux vector and H and G are matrices.

The diffusion matrix may be described as

where

To solve Eq.(41) numerically, the functions Tαand q have been interpolated as

where, 0 ≤θ=≤1 determines the practical timeτof the current time step.

By differentiating Eq.(44) with respect to time, we get

By substituting from Eqs.(44)-(46) into (40), we obtain

which can be written as follows

in which M represents unknown matrix while X and D represent known matrices.The above formula gives the temperature as a function of the displacement field.

4 BEM Solution for Displacement Fields

Use of the weighted residual method to the governing Eqs.(9) and (10) yields

where

in whichuiand ωiare approximate solutions andandare weighting functions.

The boundary conditions are

By integrating the first term of Eqs.(49) and (50) by parts, we get

Based on Huang et al.[62], we can write the following boundary integral equation

By integrating the left-hand side of (59) by parts, we get

Based on Eringen [63], we can write

Thus, Eq.(60) can be reexpressed as

By integrating the left-hand side of (62) by parts again and neglecting body forceUiand body coupleVi, we get

The weighting functions forUi=ΔnandVi=0 alongeldirection can be obtained as:

Now, we consider the following analytic fundamental solution of Dragos [64]

The weighting functions forUi=0 andVi=Δnalongeldirection can be expressed as:

The analytic fundamental solution of Dragos [64] can also be expressed as

By using the above weighting functions sets into (63) we have

Thus, we can write

where

In order to solve (72) numerically, we define the following functions

By substituting from (74) into (72), we get

which also can be written as

By applying the following definition

Thus, by using (77), we can write (76) as follows

Hence, the global matrix system can be expressed as Now, by using the initial and boundary conditions, we can write (79) as follows

5 Computational Performance of the Problem

Nowadays, modern CPUs are very powerful, versatile and can perform very complex problems much faster than previous ones [65,66].We used GMSS method for the iterative solution of the resulted linear systems of equationsAu=q, whereAis nonsingular, dense and nonsymmetric.We demonstrated the efficiency of our implemented GMSS method which results in fast convergence to the actual solution and does not need to complicated calculations.

The main objective of this section is to implement an accurate and robust iteration technique for solving the dense nonsymmetric algebraic system of linear equations arising from the BEM.So, GMSS of Huang et al.[67] has been implemented for solving the resulting linear systems in order to reduce the number of iterations and the CPU time.The BEM discretization is employed 1280 quadrilateral elements, with 3964 degrees of freedom (DOF).The generalized modified shiftsplitting (GMSS) iteration method of Huang et al.[67], Uzawa-HSS iteration method of Yang et al.[68] and regularized iteration method of Badahmane [69] were compared with each other in Tab.1.From this table, one can see that GMSS efficiency is superior to other iteration methods.

Table 1:Numerical results for the tested iteration methods

5.1 Uzawa-HSS Iteration Method

Now, the resulted linear systemAu = q in Eqs.(48) and (80) can be considered in the following form

whereA∈Cn×nis a non-Hermitian positive definite coefficient matrix,B∈Cn×mis a full-columnrank matrix such thatm≤n, D ∈Cn+mis a known vector with F ∈Cnand G ∈Cm.

The iteration scheme of Uzawa method can be defined as

Due to the effectiveness of Uzawa method, several generalized techniques of Uzawa method,such as parameterized Uzawa methods, preconditioned Uzawa methods, inexact Uzawa methods and parameterized inexact Uzawa methods, have been developed to solve (81).

In order to solve the linear systemAu=q, where,Ais Hermitian positive definite matrix.Yun [70] developed three Uzawa methods based on one-step successive over relaxation (SOR)iteration method due to its high efficiency to approximate u(k+1)in each step of Uzawa method.Yang et al.[68] proposed the Uzawa-HSS iteration method based on one-step HSS iteration instead of one-step SOR.Bai et al.[71] proposed the Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting(HSS) iteration method to solve the non-Hermitian linear systems taking into consideration thatA=H+S where H and S are the Hermitian and skew-Hermitian matrices ofAwhich can be written as

In order to describe the Uzawa-HSS, we consider the iteration scheme of HSS iteration method which is used for solving linear equations systemAu=q as follows

which equals to

where

Now, we can define the Uzawa-HSS iteration scheme as follows:

First, compute u(k+1)from the following iteration scheme

Second, compute v(k+1)from the following iteration scheme

where Q is a Hermitian positive definite preconditioning matrix.

For u(0)∈Rnand v(0)∈Rm,k=0,1,2,...until u(k)and v(k)converges, compute

where

5.2 Generalized Modified Shift-Splitting(GMSS)Iteration Method

Now, the resulted linear system (48) or (80) can be considered in the following form

whereA∈Rm×mandB∈Rm×n,n≤m.

According to Cao et al.[72] and Zhou et al.[73] and based on the well-known Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting (HSS) of the matrix A(A=H+S), of Bai et al.[71], the matrixcan be written as

Now, the iteration scheme of the modified shift-splitting (MSS) can be described for solving linear equations systemAu=q, as

Based on the MSS iteration method, the generalized modified shift-splitting (GMSS) for the nonsymmetric matrixis derived as follows

where s ≥0,β ＞0 is, another given positive constant, andIis a unit matrix.

The GMSS iteration method can be expressed as

where

and

According to Huang et al.[67], who proposed the GMSS, we can write

Now, the GMSS iteration method can be derived using the following algorithm:

It can be seen from algorithm 1 that a linear system with the coefficient matrix sI+2H+should be solved at each iteration, where the incomplete Cholesky factorization has been used as a preconditioner for Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient (PCG) Method for solving the sub-linear systems with the coefficient matrix

5.3 Regularized Iteration Method

Badahmane [69] proposed a regularized iteration method for solving the following system

whereA∈Rm×mandB∈Rm×n,n≤m.

According to Badahmane [69], the non-symmetric matrixcan be written as follows

The GMSS iteration method can be expressed as

where

where the regularized preconditioner of the matrixis

From (104), the regularized iteration method computes the approximate solutions of (102) by

which equals to

At each iteration step of regularized iteration (108), (109) should be solved using the following algorithm

1.Solve

6 Numerical Results and Discussion

The technique proposed in the current study may be applicable to a wide variety of threetemperature micropolar-thermoelastic problems relating to the suggested theory.During the simulation process the effects of time-delay and kernel function play a very important role.The proposed technique has been proven to be successful and efficient.

In the considered boundary element model, the boundary has been discretized using 42 linear boundary elements and 68 internal points as shown in Fig.2.Also, the FDM and FEM discretization of the domain has been performed using 1896 second order quadrilateral elements and 5986 nodes.

Fig.3 shows the variations of the nonlinear three-temperature (3T =Te+Ti+Tp) along x-axis for different values of time-delayωand kernel function K(τ-ξ)= [1-((τ-ξ)/ω)].It can be seen from this figure that the time-delay has a significant effect on the nonlinear three-temperature distribution.

Figs.4 and 5 show the variation of the nonlinear displacementsu1andu2along x-axis for different values of time-delayωand kernel function K(τ-ξ)=[1-((τ-ξ)/ω)].It is clear from these figures that the time delay greatly affects the displacement components.

Figure 2:Boundary element model of the considered problem

Figure 3:Variation of the 3T (T0 = 0.1) along x-axis for different values of time-delay ω and kernel function K(τ-ξ)=[1-((τ-ξ)/ω)].

Fig.6 shows the variation of the nonlinear three-temperature along x-axis for different forms of kernel function and time-delay ω=0.01.It is shown from this figure that the kernel function form has a significant influence on the nonlinear three-temperature distribution.

Figs.7 and 8 show the variation of the nonlinear displacementsu1andu2along x-axis for different forms of kernel function and time-delay ω=0.01.It can be seen from these figures that the kernel function form has a significant influence on the nonlinear displacement components.

Figure 4:Variation of the displacement u1 along x-axis for different values of time-delay ω and kernel function K(τ-ξ)=[1-((τ-ξ)/ω)]

Figure 5:Variation of the displacement u2 along x-axis for different values of time-delay ω and kernel function K(τ-ξ)=[1-((τ-ξ)/ω)]

As there are no findings available for the problem under consideration.So, some literatures may be regarded as special cases from our general BEM problem.For comparison purposes with other approaches special cases addressed by other authors, we considered only one-dimensional problem.In the special case under consideration, the results are plotted in Figs.9-11 to illustrate the total three-temperature and displacements distributions with the timeτ.The validity and exactness of our suggested technique have been demonstrated by a graphical comparison of the BEM special case results for the considered problem with those obtained using the FDM results of Pazera et al.[74] and FEM results of Xiong et al.[75] based on the substitution of threetemperature heat conduction with one-temperature heat conduction, it should be noted that the BEM results have been found to be in excellent agreement with the FDM and FEM results.

Figure 6:Variation of the temperature 3T (T0 =0.1) along x-axis for different forms of kernel function and time-delay ω=0.01

Figure 7:Variation of the displacement u1 along x-axis for different forms of kernel function and time-delay ω=0.01

Figure 8:Variation of the displacement u2 along x-axis for different forms of kernel function and time-delay ω=0.01

Figure 9:Variation of the nonlinear total temperature with time τ

Figure 10:Variation of the nonlinear displacement u1 with time τ

The performance of GMSS iteration method is compared against Uzawa-HSS iteration method and regularized iteration method.In actual computation, the parameters,(s,t)for Uzawa-HSS iteration method,(s,β)for GMSS iteration method and s for regularized iteration method have been chosen to be the experimentally found optimal ones that minimize the total number of iterative steps of these methods.Tab.1 reports the iteration number (IT), CPU time, relative residual (RES) and error (ERR) of the tested iteration methods with respect to different values of time-step size Δτ.From Tab.1, it can be observed that the GMSS requires lowest IT and CPU times, which implies that the GMSS is superior to the other methods in terms of computing efficiency.

Figure 11:Variation of the nonlinear displacement u2 with time τ

7 Conclusion

The main purpose of the current paper is to propose a new MDD theory called threetemperature nonlinear generalized anisotropic micropolar-thermoelasticity.This theory forms a new and good research point in thermoelasticity, and the scientific community will be interested in studying this research point in the following years due to its numerous low-temperature and hightemperature applications.The problems related to the proposed theory are very difficult to solve analytically.Therefore, we propose a new boundary element technique for solving such problems.For comparison purposes with other researchers in the literature, we only considered the onedimensional one-temperature heat conduction model as a special case of our three-temperature heat conduction model.The numerical results confirm the validity and exactness of our suggested technique, where the BEM results are in excellent agreement with the results of FDM and FEM.

The GMSS iteration method has been implemented for solving the resulting linear systems in order to reduce the iterations number and CPU time.The implemented GMSS iteration method is quickly convergent without needing complicated calculations and.On the other hand, it is anticipated that the GMSS iteration method with the optimal parameters(s,β)would be much better and superior than Uzawa-HSS and regularized iteration methods for solving the resulting linear system from BEM.How to select the optimal parameters(s,β)for GMSS iteration method is a very practical and interesting problem that still needs further research and can be suggested as a future work through the current study.

The numerical results of our considered study can provide data references for mechanical engineers, computer engineers, geotechnical engineers, geothermal engineers, technologists, new materials designers, physicists, material science researchers and those who are interested in novel technologies in the area of three-temperature micropolar generalized thermoelastic materials.Application of three-temperature theories in advanced manufacturing technologies, with the development of soft machines and robotics in biomedical engineering and advanced manufacturing,thermoelastic response will be encountered more often where three-temperature radiative heat conduction will turn out to be the best choice for thermomechanical analysis in the design and analysis of micropolar generalized thermoelastic materials and structures.

Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their useful suggestions and comments which gave rise to the opportunity to revise and improve this paper.

Funding Statement:The author received no specific funding for this study.

Conflict of Interest:The author declares that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.