999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Evaluation of blended internet and face-to-face continuous medical education for cupping providers in Saudi Arabia

2021-03-17 08:24:12AbdullahAlMudaiheemNasserAlHamdanAbdullahAlBedahSaudAlSanadTamerAboushanabAhmedElolemyMohamedKhalil
TMR Non-Drug Therapy 2021年1期

Abdullah A.Al-Mudaiheem, Nasser A.Al-Hamdan, Abdullah AlBedah, Saud Al Sanad, , Tamer S.Aboushanab , Ahmed T.Elolemy,4,Mohamed K.M.Khalil

1National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine,Ministry of Health,Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.2Faculty of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.3College of Medicine, Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh,Saudi Arabia.4Faculty of Medicine,Tanta University,Tanta,Egypt.

Abstract Background: In regulating cupping therapy in Saudi Arabia, there was a need to develop a system for continuous medical and professional development for cupping practitioners.The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of blended-internet continuing-medical-education (CME) on knowledge, knowledge retention, and intellectual skills in cupping providers compared with conventional, face-to-face CME. Methods:Participants were recruited from a list of registered cupping providers (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists trained and licensed to practice cupping therapy) for a randomized, open, controlled trial.After providing informed consent, participants were allocated into three groups (classes).Classes were randomized to (1) blended-internet CME (n = 31); (2)conventional, face-to-face CME (n = 31); and (3) control group receiving no intervention (n = 32). Results:Posttest knowledge scores were increased to a greater extent by blended-internet CME training compared to conventional CME (P= 0.002)or no training (P <0.001).Similarly, knowledge retention was significantly higher in the blended-internet CME group compared to the conventional CME group (P = 0.011).Posttest skills scores immediately after the course were significantly higher in the blended-internet CME group compared to the conventional CME group(mean difference:1.408,95%confidence interval:0.728-2.088,P <0.001).Conclusion:Although the current study aimed to determine if blended-internet CME is as effective as conventional,face-to-face CME,the results showed that cupping providers who participated in blended-internet CME had significantly higher scores for posttest knowledge,knowledge retention,and posttest intellectual skills.

Keywords:Cupping therapy,Complementary medicine,Education,Internet,Saudi Arabia

Background

Methods

This was a class-randomized, open, controlled trial.Participants were recruited from a list of registered cupping providers (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists trained and licensed to practice cupping therapy).After providing informed consent,participants were allocated into three groups (classes).Classes were randomized into 1) blended-internet CME; 2) conventional, FTF CME; and 3) control group(waitlisted),receiving no intervention.

Interventional education activities were developed as follows.

Conventional CME

Three days of conventional CME, named “Updates on Efficacy and Safety of Wet-Cupping” was prepared by two experienced consultants in complementary medicine and based on National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health (NCCAM/MOH) publications [17, 18].They also identified specific learning outcomes based on the knowledge and intellectual skills delivered through the training program.The training was submitted to the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties for accreditation and was accredited with CME hours(Saudi Commission for Health Specialties accreditation number:17000040322).

Developing the blended-internet CME

The educational contents of two out of the three days of the conventional CME training were converted into a video-based, e-learning format.This video content was administered over five days as test-enhanced [19]learning in which each video was followed by a quiz to be answered.The e-learning was then followed by one day of FTF training focused on intellectual skills development.

Developing the e-learning platform

A group discussion at NCCAM assessed the relative merits of purchasing a Learning Management System software license and installing it on NCCAM’s servers versus using a commercial, web-based Learning Management System service.Based on the nature of the project and the available time frame for the project,the decision was made to subscribe to a web-based Learning Management System.In selecting a service provider, several factors were considered, including the value of subscription; platform ease of use for the administrator, instructors, and trainees; ability to customize the website, add quizzes, exams, and assignments; activity tracking; and being mobile and tablet friendly.

Evaluation of knowledge and intellectual skills

Knowledge score.One hundred true or false questions were prepared to cover the primary learning outcomes,with 30 of these questions each randomly selected for the pretest, posttest, and knowledge-retention tests.The tests were scored on a binary scale (0 points for incorrect answers and 1 point for correct answers)[20].

Knowledge retention.The knowledge score measured two weeks after the intervention was used as a measure of knowledge retention.This time point was selected due to feasibility and time limitations.Thirty true or false questions were administered with each question weighted equally.

Then the poor young man again set forth2 as well as his horse could take him, begging his living as he went, and, somehow or other, he ended by reaching the home of the wind

Intellectual skills score.In the training program,fourteen evidenced-based-medicine queries were extracted from the NCCAM/MOH publication“evaluation of wet cupping therapy: a systematic review of a randomized clinical trial [17]”.The trainees were asked to (1) develop an appropriate clinical question, (2) perform a medline search for appropriate articles, (3) critically appraise a complete selected article, and (4) reach a conclusion regarding their question.Two queries were used to evaluate the skills scores before and after the training program.Each answer was evaluated by two independent trainers (consultants).The average of the scores from both trainers was used as the intellectual skills score[21].

Participants were assigned to one of the following three groups: (1) blended-internet CME consisting of five days of online instructional material using test-enhanced e-learning followed by one day of FTF training, (2) conventional CME consisting of three days of FTF training, or (3) control that received no intervention until after the study’s conclusion.The two interventional activities (blended-internet CME and FTF, conventional CME) were conducted in two different cities (Riyadh and Madinah) to prevent cross-dissemination of knowledge or a spillover effect.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome.To compare the knowledge score from 30 true or false questions within and between the blended-internet CME group, the conventional CME group, and the control group before and immediately after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes.To compare knowledge retention within and between the blended-internet CME group and the conventional CME group two weeks after the intervention; and to compare intellectual skills between the blended-internet CME group and the conventional CME group before and immediately after the intervention using two queries,each with a maximum score of five.

A questionnaire was designed to collect background variables and outcome measures.Variables included:demographic data, occupation, nationality, and the scores of the outcome results.

Statistical Analysis

Based on the results of a Shapiro-Wilk test,knowledge scores before and after the intervention did not show a significant departure from normality.Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was, therefore, used to compare postintervention scores using the baseline score as a covariate.Two-tailedP-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Sample size calculation

According to our noninferiority design, we calculated the sample size necessary to provide a 90% (1-beta)power to detect a 20% mean difference in the posttest knowledge score (non-inferiority limit: d), assuming a pooled standard deviation of 20% [20] with a significance level of alpha = 0.05.The above criteria gave a sample size of 18 in each group using a sealed-envelope site calculator [22].The sample size was doubled to include 40 in each group to allow for drop out and to end with at least 30 in each group.

Ethical consideration

The study was registered o n ClinicalTrials.gov(identifier: NCT03235895) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Fahad Medical City (the approval number: 17-292E, category:exempt).

Results

Sample characteristics

Of the 298 practitioners who received the invitation to attend the CME activities, 114 agreed to participate.Eighty cupping practitioners were allocated to the two CME interventions activities without knowing the intervention type (40 blended-internet CME; 40 conventional, FTF CME; and the remaining 34 as controls).Out of the 80 who started CME activities, 62 completed educational activities and completed the posttest (31 blended-internet CME and 31 conventional, FTF CME).Forty completed the knowledge-retention test two weeks after the course(23 blended-internet CME and 17 conventional, FTF CME).The participants assigned to the control group only completed the pre- and post-CME tests.More details are provided in the CONSORT chart(Figure 1).

Participants did not differ statistically with regards to age, gender, occupation, or nationality (Table 1).The mean age of the 16 males and 15 females in the blended-internet CME group was (40 ± 10.56) years;the 19 males and 12 females in the conventional, FTF CME group had a mean age of(42±13.90)years;and the mean age of the control group’s 17 males and 15 females was (38 ± 6.178) years.No statistically significant difference was found between the groups with respect to their duration of general experience since acquiring a basic degree (P= 0.45), duration of cupping experience before completing the cupping certification course (P= 0.45), or duration of cupping experience after completing the cupping certification course(P=0.16).

Baseline (pretest) mean knowledge and skills scores are reported in Table 2.No statistically significant differences were found between groups for pretest knowledge(P=0.31)or skills(P=0.46)scores.

Comparisons of knowledge scores, knowledge retention and skills score

There was a statistically significant increase in posttest knowledge compared to pretest scores in the blended-internet CME group(mean difference:10.032 points, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.3-11.8,P<0.001) and the conventional, FTF CME group (mean difference: 6.194 points, 95% CI: 4.467-7.920,P<0.0011).In the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest knowledge scores.There was no statistically significant decrease in knowledge retention in either CME group.There was a statistically significant increase in the skills scores of the blended-internet CME group (mean difference: 5.787 points, 95% CI:5.221-6.353,P<0.001) and the conventional, FTF CME group (mean difference: 4.387, 95% CI:3.77-5.1,P<0.001).

Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram.CME,continuing-medical-education.

Table 1 Sample characteristics

Table 2 Among-group outcome measures

Table 3 Paired posttest knowledge score comparisons between groups

A one-way, between-subjects ANCOVA was calculated to examine the effects of the interventions on posttest knowledge scores and knowledge retention while controlling for the effect of pretest knowledge scores.The adjusted means showed a statistical significant difference in posttest knowledge scores between groups (P< 0.001) (Table 2) and a statistically significant difference in knowledge retention(P=0.011)(Table 2).

Pairwise comparisons of posttest knowledge scores between study groups showed a statistically significant mean difference between all study groups (P<0.05),with 41.6% of the between-subject variance accounted for by the intervention (Table 3).The blended-internet CME group posttest knowledge score was significantly higher than that of the conventional CME (P= 0.002)or control groups (P<0.001), and the conventional CME group was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.001).Similarly, a pairwise comparison of the knowledge retention of the blended-internet and conventional CME groups showed a statistically significant difference(mean difference:2.563,95%CI:0.625-4.501,P=0.011).

A one-way, between-subjects ANCOVA was calculated to examine the effect of the interventions on posttest skills scores while controlling for the effect of the pretest skills score, which revealed a statistically significant difference (P< 0.001).Pairwise comparisons found that the difference was statistically significant between all study groups (P<0.05), with a higher posttest score in the blended-internet CME group compared to the conventional CME (mean difference: 1.408, 95% CI: 0.728-2.088,P<0.001)and control groups (P< 0.001).Additionally, the conventional group was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.001).

After controlling for pretest knowledge scores, the mean posttest knowledge score in the blended-internet CME group (mean: 21.988, 95% CI: 20.656-23.319)was significantly higher than that of the conventional CME group (mean:18.903,95%CI:17.586-20.220,P= 0.001), with nonoverlapping CIs (Table 4).The mean difference between the blended-internet CME and conventional CME groups was 3.084 (95% CI:1.209-4.960,P= 0.002) (Table 4), resulting in a nonnegative CI and a difference greater than the proposed 20%.Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.The alternative hypothesis is that the experimental intervention is noninferior to the standard intervention:H1:μe-μs >-d,21.99-18.9 >-3.78.

Discussion

This current, problem-based research aimed to solve the problem of providing the required CME hours to renew the registrations of the cumulative number of registered cupping providers.It was an attempt to transition complementary medicine CME to a digitalized, internet-based activity to enhance and speed CME completion.The primary objective was to compare a test-enhanced, internet-based CME to conventional, FTF CME.The current study a first in the field of Saudi Arabian complementary medicine.The results showed that traditional CME training blended with a test-enhanced, internet-based component can significantly increase knowledge,knowledge retention, and intellectual skills among cupping practitioners compared to conventional, FTF CME.The sample was homogenous, with no significant difference in participant ages, genders,occupations, nationalities, or years of cupping experience.Thus, the results of this study can be generalized to health care professionals qualified to practice complementary medicine.However, it cannot be generalized to traditional healers.

There was a significant change in knowledge within both intervention groups after the course, but with a greater improvement by participants in the blended-internet CME in posttest knowledge and skills compared to participants in the conventional CME group.This higher score can be explained in that the blended-internet CME group had more time to complete the learning material and prepare for the workshop (five days) with repeated visits to the website possible any time during the course, which reinforces their learning process[15,23].

The results of the current study are in agreement with the previously published research[13, 24].Richmond et al.conducted a meta-analysis of six trials comparing online health care professional training to conventional training, four assessing knowledge and two assessing practical skills, and found no difference between online and conventional training [13].Another meta-analysis by Cook et al.included 76 studies comparing internet-based learning with conventional methods in training pre- and postgraduates,and their findings showed no significant difference between the groups in knowledge, skills,behavior, or satisfaction [25].However,blended-internet education can benefit from the advantages of internet and FTF training to yield a greater impact on education and training outcomes[24,26].

Of the 38 practitioners who registered for the platform, only one needed assistance with signing in.Technical support was provided during the course by email and phone.The dropout rate was nearly equal in both intervention groups, which does not indicatedifficulty with e-learning.Trainee adherence to and progress with the online course were monitored, and reminder messages were sent to trainees before course assignment due dates.

Table 4 Effect of intervention after controlling for pretest knowledge score as a covariate

This study has some limits.For feasibility reasons and because participants were living and practicing all over SA, CME type was randomized by class and not by participant.However, class randomization took place after course registration, and participants did not know which method they would be using until the start of the course.This level of randomization is commonly used in interventional educational programs[27, 28].Randomization can be conducted at different levels, such as individuals, classes, or schools,according to feasibility and study design [27, 29].The two interventional activities (blended-internet CME and conventional, FTF CME) were conducted in two different cities (Riyadh and Madinah) to prevent cross-dissemination of knowledge or the spillover effect [30].The short follow-up period (two weeks) to measure knowledge retention was another limitation due to the time limits of the study.Longer follow-up periods are needed.Different weighting reflecting the most important knowledge to be retained would also be an important additon to future studies.Also,measuring the impact of intervention on clinical practice would be an additional, crucial outcome measure.

Conclusion

In conclusions, although the current study aimed to determine if blended-internet CME is as effective as conventional, FTF CME, the results showed that cupping providers who participated in blended-internet CME had significantly higher posttest scores for knowledge,knowledge retention,and intellectual skills.Blended-internet CME can provide trainers with a broad spectrum of tools to create and deliver effective,quality education and to permit more time for practical sessions for cupping practitioners.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品内射视频| 不卡的在线视频免费观看| a毛片在线| 久久久久亚洲AV成人人电影软件 | 欧美一级黄片一区2区| 久久99国产乱子伦精品免| 精品久久777| 国产成人亚洲毛片| 国产成人三级| 国产在线啪| 国产精品999在线| 91精品啪在线观看国产| 五月六月伊人狠狠丁香网| 日韩高清在线观看不卡一区二区| 亚洲精品福利视频| 亚洲精品国产综合99| 欧美精品高清| 真实国产乱子伦视频| 国产精品va免费视频| 久操线在视频在线观看| 激情综合网址| 精品视频在线一区| 国产小视频免费观看| 国产在线观看一区精品| 无码精油按摩潮喷在线播放| 亚洲va欧美va国产综合下载| h视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美极品| 天天色综合4| 国产青榴视频| 久草美女视频| 综合网久久| 国产无码高清视频不卡| 国产精品一线天| 久草视频精品| 一本大道无码高清| 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩专区| 欧美在线一二区| 大乳丰满人妻中文字幕日本| 国产精品99久久久久久董美香 | 91精品国产福利| 欧美国产综合色视频| 国产欧美精品专区一区二区| 91麻豆精品国产91久久久久| 成人综合在线观看| 一级一级特黄女人精品毛片| 99久久性生片| 九九视频免费在线观看| 国产精品毛片一区视频播| 国产h视频在线观看视频| 欧美成人午夜视频| 成年A级毛片| 一级一毛片a级毛片| 毛片a级毛片免费观看免下载| 国产浮力第一页永久地址 | 中国丰满人妻无码束缚啪啪| 免费一级成人毛片| 澳门av无码| 国产在线视频导航| 国产成人亚洲无码淙合青草| 亚洲免费福利视频| 亚洲国产成人自拍| 久久国产亚洲欧美日韩精品| 97se亚洲综合在线韩国专区福利| 欧美午夜理伦三级在线观看| 久精品色妇丰满人妻| 亚洲天堂首页| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区区| 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa在线看片| 免费A级毛片无码免费视频| 免费啪啪网址| 国产精品白浆在线播放| 中文字幕在线日本| a国产精品| 欧美激情视频一区二区三区免费| 四虎综合网| 98精品全国免费观看视频| 四虎影视库国产精品一区| 动漫精品中文字幕无码| 一区二区三区高清视频国产女人| 2021国产v亚洲v天堂无码| 伊人久久婷婷|