Mechanisms of ammonium removal from digested piggery wastewater by Oedogonium sp. assessed via isotope mass balance analysis

, , ,

1.Changsha Environmental Protection College, Changsha 410004, P. R. China; 2.Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, P. R. China; 3.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, P. R. China)

Abstract: Nutrient removal from digested piggery wastewater (DPW) using microalgae is of increasing interest as a secondary treatment prior to discharge to avoid environmental contamination. In this study, we investigated the main mechanisms involved in ammonium removal from DPW by Oedogonium sp. using the15N mass balance approach with a focus on the relationship between algal growth and ammonium removal and the dominant ammonium removal pathway. We noted 96.2% ammonium removal and 0.04～0.15 specific growth rate of Oedogonium sp. in the diluted autoclaved DPW during the incubation period and 94.1 % ammonium removal and -0.14～0.13 specific growth rate in the diluted raw DPW. Aeration provided a significant benefit to ammonium removal via the stripping effect, which was favored by the high pH in the experimental conditions. Isotope mass balance analysis indicated that bacteria present in the initial DPW had little effect on ammonium removal in the experiment. Algal uptake and gaseous loss were the dominant pathways for NH4—N removal from the diluted DPW using Oedogonium sp. cultures and accounted for 40.97% and 32.59% of the total 15N amount, respectively. Regression and path analyses between NH4—N removal and its main influencing factors indicated that to improve NH4—N removal efficiency, the levels of Oedogonium sp. and dissolved oxygen (DO) should be increased under weakly alkaline conditions.

Keywords:piggery wastewater; Oedogonium sp.; ammonium removal; mass balance; algal uptake

Anaerobic digestion by mesophilic or thermophilic bacteria is traditionally used as a primary treatment for piggery wastewater to reduce organic matter, waste volume, and odors and to recover biogas[1]. However, nutrient levels (especially ammonium) are not reduced during anaerobic digestion because the microorganisms employed are generally incapable of sufficient autotrophic metabolism of inorganic nitrogen[2]. The discharge of digested but otherwise untreated piggery wastewater results in excessive nutrient transport and induces aquatic eutrophication, groundwater contamination, and soil degradation[3]. For these reasons, many studies have focused on effective secondary treatments to remove nutrients from digested piggery wastewater (DPW) prior to disposal.

Most of the nitrogen retained in DPW after anaerobic digestion is in the form of ammonium nitrogen, which is readily available for use by algae in photosynthesis[4-5]. Previous studies have demonstrated that many genera of microalgae, such asChlorella,ScenedesmusandNeochloris, are capable of nutrient removal from digested livestock effluent via uptake into cells[6-7]. For example, ammonium at an initial concentration between 81 and 178 mg/L was completely removed within 21 days from digested and diluted dairy manure and then used as a nutrient supplement for the cultivation ofChlorellasp.[8].Scenedesmussp. removes ammonium at rates of 5.20～6.46 mg/(L·d) when seeded at a concentration range of 0.5～1.5 g/L in anaerobically digested livestock waste effluent[9].Neochlorisoleoabundansassimilates 90%～95% of the initial nitrate and ammonium in effluent after six days[10].

The reported NH4—N removal efficiencies vary by algae species, initial nutrient concentration, and environmental conditions. A comparison of the abilities of four green microalgae (HydrodictyaceaereticulatumLag.,Scenedesmusobliquus,Oedogoniumsp., andChlorellapyrenoidosa) and three blue-green algae (Anabaenaflos-aquae,OscillatoriaamoenaGom., andSpirulinaplatensis) to remove nutrients from diluted DPW suggests thatOedogoniumsp. is very effective at removing nutrients, especially NH4—N, which is present at an initial concentration of approximately 55 mg/L[11]. The use of microalgae for wastewater treatment offers other advantages, such as low cost, the possibility of recycling nutrients assimilated into algal biomass as fertilizer, and the discharge of oxygenated effluent into water bodies[3].

Although anOedogoniumsp.-based secondary wastewater treatment process provides great potential for NH4—N removal from DPW, the main mechanisms involved require further investigation to optimize the design of the treatment system utilizing this alga. The stable isotope15N has been traditionally used to evaluate ammonium transformation pathways in ecosystems, such as wetlands, in situ mesocosms, and laboratory microcosms[12-13]. Thus, in this study, we used the15N mass balance approach to investigate the main mechanisms by whichOedogoniumsp. removes ammonium from DPW. We describe here the relationship between algal growth and ammonium removal, the influence of bacteria initially present in DPW upon ammonium removal, and the dominant ammonium removal pathway.

1 Materials and methods

1.1 Algae strain

Algal strains ofOedogoniumsp. were obtained from the Freshwater Microalgae Culture Collection of the Institute of Hydrobiology (FACHB-Collection), Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Cells were grown in culture media[14]at 25±2 ℃ in an incubator with a 12-h photoperiod. Cells in the exponential growth phase were filtered and then used in the experiments.

1.2 Wastewater

The DPW was collected from a piggery in Changsha, China; it contained 401 mg/L chemical oxygen demand (COD), 50.36 mg/L total phosphorus (TP), 525.4 mg/L total nitrogen (TN), and 508 mg/L ammonia nitrogen (NH4—N). Pretreatment in an autoclave reduced the COD, TP, TN, and NH4—N to 369, 17.88, 169.7, and 110 mg/L, respectively. Before being used as culture media, the raw and autoclaved DPW samples were diluted with distilled water at factors of 9.2 and 2, respectively, to reduce the toxic influence of the ammonia on algal growth and obtain initial ammonia concentrations of 55 mg/L.

1.3 Experimental operation

The experiment was carried out in an incubator set at 25±2 ℃ with a 12-h photoperiod.Oedogoniumsp. cells were cultivated in 2 L flasks with a total working volume of 1 L. Cultures were continuously agitated by atmospheric air bubbling (0.5 L/min). To investigate the fate of ammonium in theOedogoniumsp. microcosm and the effect of initial bacteria in wastewater on ammonium removal, 0.67 mg15N (as ammonium sulfate) was added with the diluted raw (DRW) or diluted autoclaved (DAW) DPW. To eliminate isotopic effects, the DRW or DAW treatments without the addition of15N were also arranged in triplicate. The initial inoculum density ofOedogoniumsp. was in the range of 300 mg/L dry weight for all treatments. DRW or DAW withoutOedogoniumsp. was prepared as the control in triplicate.

1.4 Analytical procedures

During the 9 days incubation period, 50 mL samples were taken for assay on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, and water evaporation losses were supplemented with distilled water before sample collection. NH4—N, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO) analyses were performed following standard methods[15]. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 4 000 rpm for 10 min and then transferred into a 10 mL tube for algal Chl-a content (mg/L) analysis[16]. The specific growth rate, μ (day-1), was determined on the basis of the Chl-a content[16]. At the end of the experiment, a mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific MAT 253, USA) was used to measure the15N composition of TN in water and dried cells after filtration. As algal uptake, stripping volatilization, and microbial removal are the three main N removal processes in theOedogoniumsp. microcosm, the15N mass balance analysis was expressed using equations modified from Zhang et al.[12].

Ms=Mi-(Mw+Mm+Ma)

(1)

Mm=Mc-Ma

(2)

whereMiis the initial15N load in wastewater,Mwis the final15N load in DRW wastewater,Msis the estimated15N loss by stripping volatilization in DRW,Mcis the15N uptake by the cells (algal and bacterial) in DRW,Mais the15N uptake by the algae in DAW, andMmis the estimated microbial N removal.

The regression and path analyses relating NH4—N removal in DAW and the independent variables were performed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Algal growth and ammonium removal efficiencies

During the incubation period,NH4—N concentrations decreased from the initial 55 mg/L to 3.2 mg/L (DRW) and 2.1 mg/L (DAW), and the NH4—N concentrations in the DRW and DAW controls decreased to 28.1 and 32.0 mg/L on day 9, respectively (Fig.1(a)). Meanwhile, the Chl-a content increased from 1.07 to 3.35 mg/L (DRW) and 1.29 to 4.13 mg/L (DAW) (Fig.1(b)). Data related to the growth rate ofOedogoniumsp. and the ammonium removal rate are summarized in Table 1. Most of the NH4—N was removed during the first five days, accounting for 64.1%～70.4% of NH4—N removal in both treatments. By day 9, 96.2% (DAW) and 94.1% (DRW) of NH4—N was removed. After an initial adjustment to the new growth conditions, after day 3Oedogoniumsp. grew rapidly and at a steady, specific growth rate.

Fig.1 Changes in NH4—N concentration and Chl-a content of DRW and DAW over time

Table 1 Specific growth rates of Oedogonium sp. and ammonium removal rates during the incubation period

Nitrogen often exists as ammonium in anaerobically digested wastewater[17]; thus, we focused our investigation of microalgal nitrogen removal on ammonium. Algal growth and ammonium removal rates were higher for DAW than for DRW, which could be due to the relatively higher initial concentration of P in DAW than in DRW, while both treatments had similar initial NH4-N levels. In the case ofNannochloropsissp. cultivated in nutrient media, a lower N∶P supply ratio favors biomass productivity and nutrient removal[18]. It is worth noting that 41.8%～48.9% of the ammonium removed was observed on day 9 in the DRW and DAW controls without algal uptake.

2.2 Changes in pH and DO concentration

From an initial pH value of 9.0, the pH of the DRW and DRW controls decreased to 8.3 and 8.4 on day 9, respectively. The pH of DAW decreased from 9.3 to 8.0 on day 3 and reached a pH of 7.7 on day 9. The DAW control followed a similar trend, reaching a pH of 7.8 on day 9 (Fig.2(a)). These data demonstrate that during ammonium removal, the pH of the wastewater was maintained within 7.7～9.3 and mostly > 8.0. Such high values (> 8.0) favor ammonia stripping due to the shifting equilibrium from NH4to ammonia (NH3)[19]. Therefore, the extent of ammonia removal with time can be explained by NH3volatilization.

The DO concentrations in DRW and DAW increased from 4.9 and 4.7 mg/L to 6.3 and 5.8 mg/L on day 1, respectively, and then remained between 6.0 and 6.4 mg/L for both treatments. The DO concentration of the DAW control increased to 6.3 mg/Lon day 1 and then remained around 6.2 mg/L, while that of the DRW control ranged from 5.7～6.4 mg/L after day 1 (Fig.2(b)). Molecular oxygen is normally released during photosynthesis when treating wastewater with microalgae[20]. However, DO saturation (6.2 mg/L) can be maintained by appropriate aeration, which is favorable for algal cell growth and algal ammonia uptake[9]. The net algal growth rate without aeration is enhanced 1.7-fold by aeration. Moreover, the ammonium removal rate in algal cultures with aeration is approximately three times that of algal cultures without aeration[9]. At the same time, aeration contributes to ammonium removal by stripping ammonia out of wastewater directly; this process is highly favored at high pH[19]. Therefore, the NH4—N removal rate in this experiment was probably due to gas loss by NH3volatilization under conditions of high pH conditions and the stripping of ammonia by aeration in the controls as well as in DAW and DRW. These results are consistent with the aforementioned observation that 41.8%～48.9% of ammonium was removed in the controls without algal uptake.

Fig.2 Changes in pH and DO concentrations for DRW and DAW over

2.3 15N mass balance analysis

The15N mass balance inOedogoniumsp. cultures at the end of the incubation period is shown in Fig.3. We assumed that the influence of the other microorganisms on ammonium removal was negligible compared to the initial bacteria in DRW and the added algae. Based on the value of15N uptake byOedogoniumsp. in DAW and DRW with isotope and the equations (1) and (2), the estimated quantities of15N in the final wastewater, algae, and bacteria were 0.12, 0.27, and 0.06 mg, respectively, accounting for 17.31%, 40.97%, and 9.13% of the initial 0.67 mg15N in the DRWOedogoniumsp. culture. The residual15N ratio in the final wastewater at day 9 was higher than that of NH4—N in the final DRW without isotope, indicating that14N is preferentially incorporated relative to15N. This has been observed previously in studies on nitrogen isotopic fractionation associated with N uptake and assimilation by microorganisms[21-22]. Mass balance analysis showed that 0.22 mg15N disappeared from theOedogoniumsp. culture, indicating that 32.59% of the added15N was lost through gas. Ammonia stripping could be considered an important pathway for NH4—N removal from DRW; the results of the15N tracer analysis showed that NH4—N removal from DRW could be mainly attributed to NH4—N incorporation intoOedogoniumsp. and gaseous loss.

Fig.3 15N mass balance in Oedogonium sp.

2.4 Ammonium removal regression and path analyses

The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze the normality of NH4—N removal in DAW as the dependent variable. The resulting Shapiro-Wilk statistic is 0.950 (pvalue of 0.736 > 0.05), which means that the dependent variable (Y) is distributed normally, that is,Yis a normal variable for regression analysis. The regression equation to define the relationship betweenYand the main influencing factors or independent variables, namely, DO (X1), pH (X2), and Chl-a content (X3), was established by stepwise regression using quadratic polynomials expressed as follows:

(3)

The correlation coefficient resulting from the equation is close to 1 (R=0.994) with a small standard deviation (S=0.045), indicating the high accuracy of fit of the equation.

The correlation values between different independent variables and NH4—N removal are shown in Table 2. The results suggest that the degree of influence of the three independent variables on NH4—N removal is ranked as follows: Chl-a content > DO > pH. However, it is often difficult to clearly show which variable plays the major decisive or restrictive role on the dependent variable based on subdividing the correlation coefficient between different variables. Path analysis can check whetherXihas a significant effect onY, and most importantly, it determines whetherXidirectly or indirectly affects the dependent variable through other independent variables.

Table 2 Correlation coefficients between different variables

The path analysis yields the path coefficient between three independent variables and NH4—N removal (Table 3). Among the three independent variables, Chl-a content has the greatest direct effect onY(P3y) followed by pH, and DO has the smallest direct effect. An analysis of various indirect path coefficients demonstrated that, despite the large value ofP2y, the indirect effect of pH onYthrough DO and Chl-a content produced a large negative value (P21y= -1.192 andP23y=-1.956), and the correlation coefficientR2ybetween pH andYis highly negative (-0.966). The Chl-a content had the greatest indirect effect onYthrough DO, yielding an indirect path coefficientP31yof 0.542, while DO had the second greatest indirect effect onYthrough Chl-a content, yielding an indirect path coefficientP13yof 0.207. Therefore, Chl-a content plays an important role in NH4—N removal. To improve NH4—N removal, Chl-a content and DO must increase while the pH is maintained in a weakly alkaline range.

Table 3 Path coefficients between different variables

3 Conclusion

In conclusion, 96.2% ammonium removal and 0.04～0.15 specific growth rate ofOedogoniumsp. were observed in DAW during the incubation period, while 94.1% ammonium removal and -0.14～0.13 specific growth rate ofOedogoniumsp. were observed in DRW. High pH and aeration provided a significant benefit to ammonium removal by NH3volatilization and the stripping effect during the incubation period.15N isotope mass balance analysis indicates that bacteria initially present in DPW have little effect on ammonium removal inOedogoniumsp. cultures in DRW, as this occurs primarily through algal uptake, ammonia volatilization, and stripping processes. The statistical analysis between three independent variables and NH4—N removal indicates that increased levels ofOedogoniumsp. and DO under weakly alkaline conditions can improve the efficiency of NH4—N removal. Using the ammonium-based isotope tracing method, we hypothesize thatOedogoniumsp. is effective for treating DPW with high ammonium loading under adapted DO and pH values. Thus, culture conditions should be evaluated to improve the efficiency of nutrient treatment when microalgae are used for the secondary agricultural wastewater treatment process. Further investigation of whetherOedogoniumsp. has the capacity to simultaneously remove other pollutants, such as phosphorus and heavy metals, will be useful in assessing the practical potential of this organism as a biological agent for secondary treatment of DPW. In addition, as it affects the growth of algae, the influence of light time on ammonium removal will be further studied.

Acknowledgements

This work was nancially supported by the Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (No. 19C0026), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017JJ5061). We gratefully acknowledge anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.