Endoscopic resection for residual lesion of metastatic gastric cancer:A case report

Kaori Hayashi,Sho Suzuki,Hisatomo Ikehara,Hiroaki Okuno,Akira Irie,Mitsuru Esaki,Chika Kusano,Takuji Gotoda,Mitsuhiko Moriyama

Abstract

Key words: Gastric cancer;Liver metastases;Conversion;Endoscopic submucosal dissection;Chemotherapy;Case report

INTRODUCTION

For patients with stage IV gastric cancer,chemotherapy is a standard treatment option.Improvements in chemotherapy regimens have improved patient survival[1];for example,patients' median survival time is longer and the response rate continues to rise[2,3].However,treatment outcomes for metastatic gastric cancer(mGC)remain unsatisfactory.Regardless,the improved efficacy of chemotherapy has led to the ability to perform surgery on tumors that were originally regarded as technically or oncologically unresectable or only marginally resectable.Conversion surgery is one treatment option with the potential to improve survival outcomes[4].Yet,some factors prevent surgical resection,particularly advanced age,low performance status,and comorbidity,even if the patient achieves a complete response from chemotherapy.Many of these patients also experience difficulties with continuing intensive chemotherapy;thus,palliative treatment is often performed.Additionally,gastric stenosis and gastroparesis caused by local recurrence are major problems that decrease a patient's quality of life.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is a common practice used to resect early gastric cancer.It is a minimally intensive procedure that can preserve quality of life.Moreover,the procedure can resect the whole specimen,which allows for correct histopathological assessment.We report herein a case of a patient with mGC that responded to chemotherapy and who underwent a complete resection of the residual tumor using ESD.Twenty-nine months after the ESD,no local recurrence or distant metastases have been found.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 85-year-old Japanese male complained of difficulty swallowing and visited a hospital.He had a medical history of untreated abdominal aortic aneurysm and pulmonary phthisis.He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy to diagnose his symptoms,and a protruding lesion at the gastric cardia was found.Endoscopic biopsy confirmed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.Abdominal computed tomography(CT)showed no evidence of the tumor invading the muscularis propria and serosa,enlarged lymph nodes,or distant metastases.Therefore,this lesion was diagnosed as stage IA gastric cancer(cT1N0M0,7thedition of UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors).

Four months after diagnosis,the patient visited our institution for treatment of this lesion.It took a long time for the patient to visit because he could not decide which treatment to take,with his options being surgery and endoscopic treatment.The tumor(Figure 1A)grew to 20 mm in size,and abdominal CT result showed clear evidence of multiple mass lesions(range:10-30 mm)in the liver,suggesting metastases of his gastric cancer(Figure 1B);however,there was no evidence of the tumor invading the muscularis propria and serosa or of lymph nodes' swelling.Therefore,the diagnosis was changed to stage IV gastric cancer.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The clinical diagnosis was gastric cancer with liver metastases;stage IV(cT1N0M1).

TREATMENT

Although the patient was elderly,he was in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 and had adequate organ functions;therefore,chemotherapy was deemed appropriate.

S-1 and oxaliplatin combination therapy(SOX)were administered.S-1 was administered orally(100 mg/d),and oxaliplatin was deliveredviaintravenous infusion(70 mg/m2diluted in 500 mL of saline over 120 min).The patient underwent four cycles of SOX,beginning 1 mo after the diagnosis of mGC.Each SOX cycle lasted 3 wk,with S-1 administered daily on days 1 to 14 of each cycle,and oxaliplatin administered only on day 1 of each cycle.After SOX,the primary lesion decreased,although it was confirmed macroscopically,and endoscopic biopsy revealed no atypia.Additionally,CT confirmed no evidence of liver metastases.However,the patient had grade 3 sensory peripheral neuropathy(Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0;CTCAE4.0);thus,oxaliplatin was discontinued and S-1 was continued for two additional cycles.Thereafter,the primary lesion macroscopically appeared smooth and protruded,and it appeared similar to a submucosal tumor(Figure 2A).The endoscopic biopsy still revealed no atypia.CT results showed no lymph node swelling or distant metastasis(Figure 2B).Therefore,we determined that the patient had had a complete response to the chemotherapy.At that point,the patient's difficulty in swallowing had improved,but he had grade 3 anorexia and sensory peripheral neuropathy(CTCAE4.0);therefore,S-1 was discontinued.

Due to the patient's response to chemotherapy,conversion surgery was considered.The patient's liver metastases had completely disappeared and the primary lesion became unclear macroscopically;however,conversion surgery was difficult because of his advanced age and comorbidities.Although the biopsy specimen at the mucosa of the primary lesion revealed no atypia after chemotherapy,a residual tumor was suspected under the mucosal layer because it looked like there was submucosal tumor.Therefore,ESD was performed for the primary lesion.The lesion was resected with no complications.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The pathological diagnosis of the specimen was 28 mm × 12 mm,U,type 0-IIc,1.0 mm× 1.0 mm,well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma(tub1),ypT1b(SM),ly0,v0,pHM(-),and pVM(-)in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer(Figure 3A and 3B).After ESD,no recurrence was observed during the 29 mo follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Figure2 Objective image findings after chemotherapy.

To our knowledge,this is the first report describing the efficacy of ESD to prevent local recurrence and help maintain quality of life for a patient with mGC.Effective chemotherapy,followed by complete resection with negative margin using ESD,contributed to a good clinical course.

SOX was an effective and safe chemotherapeutic treatment in our patient's case.A previous phase III study(G-SOX study)showed that SOX was not inferior to S-1 plus cisplatin therapy(CS)inefficacy[5].Regarding safety,SOX has shown better tolerability than CS in elderly patients,with a lower frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events,as well as lower occurrence of increased creatinine levels[6].In clinical practice,SOX is administered more frequently than CS because of its feasibility.

In this case,the patient achieved a complete response for multiple liver masses,and the primary lesion size decreased from SOX,but it was difficult to continue chemotherapy due to adverse events(i.e.,peripheral sensory neuropathy and anorexia).Recently,conversion surgery has been proposed and clinically performed following successful chemotherapy.Some studies showed that a microscopically margin-negative(R0)resection for a primary lesion after a good response to chemotherapy improved survival outcomes for mGC patients[7,8].Additionally,cytoreductive or volume-reduction surgery has not shown survival benefits in similar patients[9,10].Satoet al[11]reported a 5-year overall survival(OS)(median survival time of 47.9 mo)of 48.6% in patients with stage IV gastric cancer who had undergone R0 resection after chemotherapy.Additionally,R0 resection led to a significantly longer OS than did R1(microscopic residual tumor)and R2(macroscopic residual tumor)resections.Similarly,in patients with stage IV gastric cancer who had a gastrectomy after chemotherapy,OS was significantly longer from R0 resection only(median OS =19.2 mo)[12].

Based on newly proposed classification categories for stage IV gastric cancer[13],our case was Category 2.Category 2 is indicative of the absence of macroscopic peritoneal dissemination,with marginally resectable metastatic lesions that are oncologically or technically unresectable.Furthermore,the proposed treatment strategy for Category 2 is conversion surgery,if the patient achieves a satisfactory response to chemotherapy.Therefore,our case was theoretically a good candidate for conversion surgery;however,the patient was elderly and had an untreated large abdominal aortic aneurysm.Moreover,the patient was concerned about decreased performance status due to total gastrectomy.

In cases in which the patient cannot undergo surgery and continue intensive chemotherapy,similar to the case of our patient,most patients shift to less-intensive chemotherapy or supportive care.In the current standard chemotherapy,subsequent chemotherapies are not always less-intensive.In clinical practice,some reports state that less intensive monotherapy was conducted for frail patients[14,15].Nishimuraet al[16]reported that irinotecan monotherapy after refractory response to fluoropyrimidine,platinum and taxanes showed modest activity.However,in these reports,even though most patients' PS were 0-1,their prognoses were poor.For frail patients,if chemotherapy may decrease PS level and worsen prognosis,then supportive care is often chosen as the best alternative.Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic strategies for these patients to manage localized tumors[17,18].However,in this case,radiotherapy was not conducted due to comorbidity.

Figure3 Result of gastric submucosal dissection.

Local tumor progression is a problem in many of these patients.Gastric stenosis,obstruction,gastroparesis,bleeding,and pain are common conditions caused by local recurrence or advanced primary lesions that ultimately decrease a patient's quality of life.For these cases,there are some available strategies,such as palliative gastrectomy,palliative gastrojejunostomy,or endoscopic stent.In this case,the patient did not suffer from obstruction at the end of chemotherapy.Although biopsy results both during and after chemotherapy were categorized as Group 1,the primary lesion appeared similar to a submucosal tumor.Considering that a lesion sometimes exists at the submucosa like an inverted polyp[19],a residual tumor was suspected.If the residual tumor had remained and grown,there would have been a risk of obstruction.Therefore,ESD was used to first confirm the residual tumor and then resect the lesion completely.The results of this case suggest that when clinically possible,conversion surgery is a better treatment option,because a tumor may remain even without macroscopic evidence of the disease.

ESD is a less-intensive treatment and common practice to resect early gastric cancer,rather than surgical resection[20,21].ESD enables resection of the whole lesion,thereby allowing a correct histopathological assessment.Furthermore,the procedure is safe and effective in elderly patients.Abeet al[22]reported that the complication rate(bleeding and perforation rates of 3.2% and 2.8%,respectively)of ESD was similar in elderly(≥ 80 years)and non-elderly patients with early gastric cancer,indicating that ESD was a safe procedure,even for the elderly.Additionally,Watanabeet al[23]reported no significant differences in adverse events(i.e.,rate of perforation,postoperative bleeding,aspiration pneumonia,or stricture)among patients with early gastric cancer,regardless of age.Several studies reported that endoscopic therapies,such as ESD,for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy ensured safety.Furthermore,endoscopic therapy can be locally controlled and may improve both overall and disease-specific survival rates[24,25].In the presented case,we achieved local control from the resection using ESD,which may provide therapeutic improvements in both local control and survival outcomes for the patient.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion,we presented a rare case of a complete resection with negative margins using ESD for a remnant submucosal lesion after chemotherapy for mGC.The patient has been alive for the past 29 mo after ESD,with no sign of local recurrence.