余永林


[摘要] 目的 評價補腎降壓方治療老年原發性高血壓的臨床療效。 方法 整群選取2012年5月—2014年11月該院收治的老年原發性高血壓患者151例,隨機分為兩組,其中觀察組76例,選用中藥補腎降壓方進行治療,對照組75例,選用西醫常規療法進行處理,觀察并比較兩組患者臨床療效以及各指標變化。 結果 觀察組臨床療效優良率為94.7%,對照組為82.7%,兩組患者臨床療效優良率比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。 結論 補腎降壓方治療老年原發性高血壓的臨床療效好,能明顯降低患者血漿醛固酮水平,不良反應較少,值得在臨床上予以推廣。
[關鍵詞] 原發性高血壓;血漿醛固酮;血漿腎素活性
[中圖分類號] R259 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2015)09(a)-0180-02
Feasibility and Safety Study of Antihypertensive Kidney Treatment in Essential Hypertension buck
YU Yong-lin
Department of medical, The center hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430051 China
[Abstract] Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of antihypertensive kidney treatment in elderly hypertensive. Methods 151 cases of patients from May 2012 to Nov 2014 in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. For 76 cases in the observation group, was chosed to antihypertensive medicine kidney treatment; for 75 cases in the control group, was chosed to Western conventional therapy. Observed and compared the clinical efficacy, and changes of each indexs of the two groups of patients after treatment. Results Excellent clinical efficacy in the study group was 94.7%, and the control group was 82.7%. Difference in superior clinical efficacy rate of the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of antihypertensive Kidney Treatment of essential hypertension is good, it can significantly reduce plasma aldosterone levels in patients, and has fewer side effects, so it deserved to be in clinical practice.
[Key words] Essential hypertension; Plasma aldosterone; Plasma renin activity
原發性高血壓是心內科的常見病癥之一,它是一種以體循環動脈壓力持續升高為主要特征的綜合性疾病,在對它的治療中,西醫治療初期降壓效果好,但隨著病情的發展,純西醫治療往往不能有效的控制血壓,防止并發癥的發生[1]。該研究整群選取2012年5月-2014年11月該院收治的老年原發性高血壓患者151例作為對象,評價補腎降壓方治療老年原發性高血壓的臨床療效,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
整群選取2012年5月—2014年11月該院收治的老年原發性高血壓患者151例,隨機分為兩組,其中觀察組76例,男性41例,女性35例,年齡(66.7±4.9)歲,病程(10.1±0.7)年,血漿醛固酮為(172.1±20.5)pg/mL,血漿腎素活性為(1.88±0.20)ng/mL,血管緊張素Ⅰ為(2.46±0.08)ng/mL,對照組75例,男性39例,女性36例,年齡(66.1±4.3)歲,病程(8.9±1.0)年,血漿醛固酮為(174.2±18.9)pg/mL,血漿腎素活性為(1.87±0.15)ng/mL,血管緊張素Ⅰ為(2.45±0.13)ng/mL。所用病例均得到患者知情同意,該項研究通過該院倫理委員會批準,兩組患者在年齡、性別等一般資料上差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。……p>