單錦妹 (江蘇省鹽城市第三人民醫(yī)院,江蘇鹽城224001)
無(wú)痛分娩技術(shù)在產(chǎn)科臨床中的應(yīng)用分析
單錦妹(江蘇省鹽城市第三人民醫(yī)院,江蘇鹽城224001)
目的:觀察、分析無(wú)痛分娩技術(shù)在產(chǎn)婦分娩過程中的應(yīng)用效果.方法:選擇2013-06/2015-08于我院產(chǎn)科采用無(wú)痛分娩術(shù)輔助分娩的250例產(chǎn)婦作為觀察組,以同期產(chǎn)科收治的常規(guī)分娩產(chǎn)婦250例作為對(duì)照組,對(duì)比觀察兩組產(chǎn)婦的預(yù)后、產(chǎn)程、鎮(zhèn)痛效果.結(jié)果:與對(duì)照組相比,觀察組的會(huì)陰側(cè)切率和剖宮產(chǎn)率顯著低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05),而觀察組的無(wú)痛分娩率則明顯更高(P<0.05).在產(chǎn)程方面,觀察組、對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦的平均產(chǎn)程分別為(7.19±2.58)h和(9.30±2.70)h,而觀察組、對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦中產(chǎn)程在8 h以內(nèi)者分別占58.0%和14.0%,與對(duì)照組比較,觀察組的產(chǎn)程也顯著更短(P<0.05).結(jié)論:無(wú)痛分娩技術(shù)可顯著縮短產(chǎn)程、減少產(chǎn)婦痛苦、降低剖宮產(chǎn)率、保障母嬰安全,值得在產(chǎn)科中推廣和應(yīng)用.
無(wú)痛分娩;產(chǎn)科;應(yīng)用;臨床價(jià)值
無(wú)痛分娩可提高自然分娩成功率、保障母嬰安全,在產(chǎn)科中具有廣闊的應(yīng)用前景,觀察、分析無(wú)痛分娩術(shù)在產(chǎn)婦分娩過程中的應(yīng)用效果,有助于臨床分娩技術(shù)的不斷改善與提高.本研究對(duì)我科接收的500例產(chǎn)婦進(jìn)行了分組對(duì)比試驗(yàn),并將具體研究情況報(bào)告如下.
1.1一般資料選擇2013-06/2015-08我院產(chǎn)科分娩的500例單胎頭位產(chǎn)婦,排除合并癥、麻醉藥物禁忌癥、早產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦,根據(jù)輔助分娩方式不同將上述產(chǎn)婦分為兩組行對(duì)比觀察.對(duì)照組250例接受常規(guī)分娩輔助,產(chǎn)婦年齡24~31(平均26.5±2.1)歲,其中初產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦、經(jīng)產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦分別有190例和60例;觀察組250例則接受鎮(zhèn)痛分娩(無(wú)痛分娩),產(chǎn)婦年齡25~32(平均26.7±1.8)歲,本組初產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦、經(jīng)產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦分別有205例和45例,組間產(chǎn)婦的年齡、分娩經(jīng)歷等基礎(chǔ)資料比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)意義(P>0.05).
1.2方法
1.2.1分娩輔助方法①對(duì)照組:本組250例產(chǎn)婦在分娩時(shí)由護(hù)士對(duì)其進(jìn)行安慰、鼓勵(lì),并由產(chǎn)婦按照護(hù)士指導(dǎo)的呼吸分娩法進(jìn)行分娩,本組產(chǎn)婦不予以鎮(zhèn)痛藥物,當(dāng)產(chǎn)婦發(fā)生難產(chǎn)或陰道撕裂、出血時(shí)應(yīng)行剖宮產(chǎn)、會(huì)陰側(cè)切以避免危險(xiǎn)發(fā)生,而在各個(gè)產(chǎn)程中護(hù)士也應(yīng)作好相應(yīng)的輔助護(hù)理工作.②觀察組:本組250例產(chǎn)婦在常規(guī)輔助護(hù)理基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)施鎮(zhèn)痛分娩,在第一產(chǎn)程子宮開口2 cm后對(duì)產(chǎn)婦行硬膜外麻醉,操作時(shí)應(yīng)正確選擇相應(yīng)型號(hào)的穿刺針,在腰椎L2~3或L3~4行置入刺針,硬膜外導(dǎo)管注入試驗(yàn)量1%利多卡因4 mL,測(cè)定麻醉平面正常后給予負(fù)荷劑量的0.1%羅哌卡因10 mL,阻滯平面控制在T10以下,接PCEA泵(0.1%羅哌卡因復(fù)合芬太尼1 mg/mL)10 mL/h,(追加劑量5 mL/次,鎖定時(shí)間15 min),產(chǎn)婦給藥15 min后,檢測(cè)產(chǎn)婦的針刺感覺消失平面、溫度感覺消失平面,判斷孕婦肌力,協(xié)助麻醉師做VAS評(píng)定(運(yùn)動(dòng)神經(jīng)阻滯程度按Bromage標(biāo)準(zhǔn)0~3級(jí)測(cè)定),排除蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔阻滯征象,至宮口開全后停藥.
1.2.2觀察指標(biāo)①產(chǎn)程:觀察、記錄從產(chǎn)前宮縮開始至胎兒娩出的時(shí)間,即由第一產(chǎn)程開始至第三產(chǎn)程完成所用時(shí)間,產(chǎn)程越短,則說明分娩過程越順利、產(chǎn)婦痛苦越小.②無(wú)痛分娩率:采用視覺模擬法對(duì)產(chǎn)婦分娩疼痛程度進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),并將其分為無(wú)痛(分娩過程腰腹無(wú)明顯痛感或輕微不適)、微痛(腰腹輕微酸痛)和劇痛(腰腹疼痛明顯、產(chǎn)婦難以忍受)三種,并將無(wú)痛和微痛產(chǎn)婦所占比率記為無(wú)痛分娩率.
1.3統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理采用SPSS17.0軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)分析,以率(%)表示相關(guān)計(jì)數(shù)資料,并對(duì)組間計(jì)數(shù)資料采用x2檢驗(yàn),P<0.05表示差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,
觀察組的會(huì)陰側(cè)切率和剖宮產(chǎn)率顯著低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05),而與對(duì)照組相比,觀察組的無(wú)痛分娩率則明顯更高(P<0.05).在產(chǎn)程方面,觀察組、對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦的平均產(chǎn)程分別為(7.19±2.58)h和(9.30± 2.70)h,而觀察組、對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦中產(chǎn)程在8 h以內(nèi)者分別占58.0%和14.0%,與對(duì)照組比較,觀察組的產(chǎn)程也顯著更短,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05,表1).

表1 兩組產(chǎn)婦的分娩結(jié)局、產(chǎn)程、鎮(zhèn)痛效果比較[n=250,n(%)]
自然分娩過程中往往伴隨著劇烈的疼痛,這種痛感給產(chǎn)婦的心理、生理上帶來了巨大的痛苦.生理的疼痛往往提示存在胎位不正、難產(chǎn)、出血等產(chǎn)科并發(fā)癥,而心理上的壓力更能促使產(chǎn)婦放棄自然分娩而選擇剖宮產(chǎn)的方式終止妊娠,然而有研究指出,不符合剖宮產(chǎn)指征的產(chǎn)婦行剖宮產(chǎn)后可給母嬰的安全帶來較大隱患和不確定影響,恰當(dāng)?shù)姆置浞绞剑ǚ置漭o助)對(duì)于提高自然分娩成功率、減輕產(chǎn)婦痛苦、保障母嬰安全具有關(guān)鍵意義[1].
在產(chǎn)科臨床中,常規(guī)輔助、無(wú)痛分娩是兩種常用的分娩輔助方式,常規(guī)分娩主要采用心理干預(yù)、專業(yè)指導(dǎo)的方式來引導(dǎo)產(chǎn)婦完成自然分娩.實(shí)際分娩過程中,在分娩疼痛的作用下,患者的依從度往往較差、同時(shí)伴隨著較大的心理壓力,這也影響了輔助分娩的效果[2];無(wú)痛分娩也稱作鎮(zhèn)痛分娩,是指在分娩過程中對(duì)產(chǎn)婦的腰腹部實(shí)施局部麻醉以減輕其分娩痛感,同時(shí)保持產(chǎn)婦的正常體力、意識(shí)和活動(dòng)能力的輔助分娩方式.相關(guān)研究也證實(shí),無(wú)痛分娩具有方便、安全、有效等優(yōu)勢(shì),在產(chǎn)科臨床中具有重要應(yīng)用價(jià)值[3].本研究對(duì)上述兩種分娩方式進(jìn)行對(duì)比發(fā)現(xiàn),觀察組產(chǎn)婦的會(huì)陰側(cè)切率和剖宮產(chǎn)率更低、產(chǎn)程更短、無(wú)痛分娩率更高,且組間指標(biāo)比較,差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05).無(wú)痛分娩鎮(zhèn)痛效果良好,且具有安全、方便、適應(yīng)癥范圍廣等優(yōu)勢(shì),可顯著縮短產(chǎn)程、減少產(chǎn)婦痛苦、降低剖宮產(chǎn)率、保障母嬰安全,值得在產(chǎn)科中推廣和應(yīng)用.
[1]郝曉存.無(wú)痛分娩技術(shù)在產(chǎn)科臨床應(yīng)用分析[J].河南醫(yī)學(xué)研究,2014,23(3):95-96.
[2]申紅艷.無(wú)痛分娩在產(chǎn)科中的應(yīng)用[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)藥指南,2015,13(6):143.
[3]林元恒,伍彩雯,劉靜.無(wú)痛分娩技術(shù)的應(yīng)用效果及其對(duì)分娩過程的影響[J].吉林醫(yī)學(xué),2015,36(14):3075.
Clinical application of painless delivery in the department of obstetrics
SHAN Jin-Mei
The Third Peope’s Hospital of Yancheng,Yancheng 224001,China
AIM:To observe and analyze the clinical application effect of painless delivery.METHODS:A total of 250 cases of pregnantwomen underwent painless delivery and admitted into our hospital from June 2013 to August 2015 were selected as observation group,and 250 cases underwent normal delivery in the same period as control group.The prognosis,delivery process and the analgesic effect of pregnant women in the two groups were compared and observed.RESULTS:The rates of perineal side incision and cesarean section in the observation group were lower than that in the controlgroup(P<0.05),while the rate of painless delivery in the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).The average duration in observation group and control group were 7.19±2.58 hours and 9.30±2.70 hours respectively,and those delivered within 8 hours accounted for 58.0%and 14.0%respectively;There was statistically significant difference.CONCLUSION:Painless delivery can significantly shorten the delivery process,reduce maternal pain,decrease the rate of cesarean section,and protect the safety of mother and child,which isworthly of promoting in the department of obstetrics.
painless delivery;obstetrics;application;clinical value
R714.3
A
2095?6894(2015)08?078?02
2015-07-11;接受日期:2015-08-01
單錦妹.本科,主任醫(yī)師.研究方向:產(chǎn)科.Tel:0515?81606311E?mail:1958720075@qq.com