999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Genotypic characterization, invasion index and antimicrobial resistance pattern in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from clinical samples

2015-07-12 07:37:11BehroozSadeghiKalaniAbazarPournajafMansourSedighiAbbasBahadorGholamrezaIrajianFiruzehValianDepartmentofMicrobiologyFacultyofMedicineTehranUniversityofMedicalSciencesTehranIRIranDepartmentofMicrobiologyFacultyofMedicineIranU
Journal of Acute Disease 2015年2期

Behrooz Sadeghi Kalani, Abazar Pournajaf, Mansour Sedighi, Abbas Bahador*, Gholamreza Irajian*, Firuzeh ValianDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR IranDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR IranDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran

Genotypic characterization, invasion index and antimicrobial resistance pattern in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from clinical samples

Behrooz Sadeghi Kalani1, Abazar Pournajaf2, Mansour Sedighi2, Abbas Bahador1*, Gholamreza Irajian2*, Firuzeh Valian3
1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article history:

Received 9 February 2015

Received in revised form 11 February 2015 Accepted 12 February 2015

Available online 13 February 2015

Keywords:

Genotypic characterization

Invasion index

Antimicrobial resistance

Listeria monocytogenes

Objective: To evaluate antimicrobial resistance, invasion index and genetic profile in Listeria monocytogenes isolated from clinical samples. Methods: At all, 170 clinical samples were collected from patients with spontaneous abortions hospitalized in Shariati hospital in Tehran during June 2010 to August 2013. Invasion index was determined using HeLa cells. The multiplelocus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis (MLVA) was used for evaluation of genetic relatedness. Results: Out of 14 L. monocytogenes isolates, 4 (28.57%), 2 (14.28%), 0 (0%), 5 (35.71%) and 3 (21.42%) were isolated from placental tissue, urine, blood, vaginal and rectal swabs, respectively. High resistance to penicillin and multidrug resistant were found amongst isolates. The invasion index was in the range of 0.001-0.007. Seven different types were obtained by MLVA assay and type 2 and 3 with 4 strains were the most frequent type. Strains isolated from the vagina and the placenta of the same type were also more resistant to penicillin. Conclusions: Since MLVA is a high-throughput screening method that is fairly inexpensive, easy to accomplish, rapid, and trustworthy, it is well suited to interlaboratory comparisons during epidemiological investigations. Also further studies of larger samples from a variety of sources such as food and animal specimens recommended comparing by MLVA method.

Tel: +98-21-88058649

E-mail: Dr.irajian@gmail.com

Fax: +98-21-88058649

Abbas Bahador, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Tel: +98-9122207431

E-mail: ab.bahador@gmail.com

Fax: +98-21-88058649

1. Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a Grampositive bacteria that is ubiquitous in soil, vegetable and other ecological sources[1-4], and causes maternofetal infections, gastroenteritis and meningoencephalitis through its capability to cross the gastric, placental and blood-brain barriers, respectively[5]. Infection of pregnant women is significant because placenta is a proper niche for L. monocytogenes growth[6]. According to Food Net US, listeriosis was responsible for 30% of foodborne deaths from 1996 to 2005 and had a high mortality rate to 16.9%[7].

Although most isolates are susceptible to antibiotics, recently, several cases of antibiotic resistance has been reported[8]. Therefore, perform of the antimicrobial susceptibility test is essential for L. monocytogenes isolates[9]. Several laboratory tests have been improved for virulence determination of L. monocytogenes. These include in vitro cell assays, in vivo bioassays and methods for main virulence related proteins and their responsible genes[10]. The severity of disease caused by L. monocytogenes makes it essential to use of a technique that can quickly detect outbreaks and be used in identification of source and tracking. Serotyping, ribotyping, Amplified fragment length polymorphism and pulsed field gel electrophoresis were used previously for typing of L. monocytogenes. Althoughpulsed field gel electrophoresis has a high discriminatory power, the method is time consuming and expensive and it is also difficult to interpret[11,12]. In recent years, multiplelocus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis (MLVA) with agarose-gel separation has been described with good results[13-16]. The aim of this study is an evaluation of antimicrobial resistance, invasion index and genetic profile in Listeria monocytogenes isolated from clinical samples.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Bacterial isolation

During June 2010-August 2013 a total of 170 clinical samples were collected from a hospitalized woman with spontaneous abortion in Shariati hospital in Tehran, Iran.

2.2. Enrichment, culturing, morphological and biochemical identification

Firstly, 5mL from each of urine and blood samples and 20 g of the placental tissue were inoculated in to 50 and 230 mL of TSBYE (Tryptic soy broth plus 0.6% yeast extract, Merck, Germany). Also, every of fecal and vaginal swabs were inoculated into 10 mL of TSBYE. Then, all the samples were incubated at 4 ℃. After 2 weeks to 6 months incubation, aliquots from enrichment broth (TSBYE) were streaked on PALKAM Agar (Merck, Germany) and plates were incubated in 35 ℃ for 24 to 48 h. The green shiny colonies with diffuse dark shadow around them on PALCAM agar were doubted to be Listeria. Five typic colonies of Listeria were purified on Brain Heart Infusion agar (Merck, Germany) and recognized by morphological, cultural and biochemical tests. Approval of isolates was done by Gram’s staining, oxidase test, catalase reaction, voges proskauer (MR-VP), methyl red tests and fermentation of sugars (rhamnose, xylose, methyl α-D-mannopyranoside and mannitol). All the biochemically characterized isolates were tested for haemolysis on Sheep Blood Agar, Christie, Atkins and Munch Petersen (CAMP) test. The definite isolates as L. monocytogenes were stored at preservation medium including glycerol (15%) and pepton (1%).

2.3. Antibiotic susceptibility test

The susceptibility of isolates were established by the disk diffusion agar method as approved by CLSI guidelines M45-A2 for L. monocytogenes strains[17], and eight antibiotic discs, namely chloramphenicol (10 μg), penicillin G (10 U), tetracycline (25 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), trimethoprim (5 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg) ciprofloxacin (5 μg), (Himedia, India) were used. Also, L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 was used as the reference strain.

2.4. Invasion index determination

To assess the invasiveness of strains the HeLa cells were used. Strains were inoculated to the brain hearts infusion broth and then incubated at 37 °C for 24-48 h. Optical density was determined by spectrophotometry that 3×106and 3×107dilutions were prepared. Each strain adds to 2 well which one of the wells contains gentamicin but no other. Then plates incubated for 2 h and washing steps finely done by phosphate buffered saline for collapse of Hella cells, were presence of the Triton-X-100 and then the solution of the wells that contain the bacteria moved into brain heart infusion agar. After 24 h incubation in 37 ℃, colony count executed. Invasion index was determined by division of obtained bacteria after addition of gentamycin per number of counted bacteria before addition of the gentamycin.

2.5. DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for Gram-positive bacteria.

2.6. MLVA typing

In this study, Five VNTR loci (Lm-10, Lm-11, Lm-32, Lm-23, lm-TR6) and five related primer pairs that previously designed were used to perform MLVA Technique (Table 1)[18]. Specificity of all primers was confirmed by the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool.

For amplification of five loci that described above, PCR technique was used. The reaction mix involved of 1 μL of extracting DNA, 2.5 μL of 10×PCR buffer, 0.5 μL dNTP (10 mmol/L), 1.5 μL MgCl2(50 mmol/L), 0.4 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 unit/μL), 1.25 μL of each primer and deionized water to a final volume of 25 μL. Cycling parameters for the PCR protocol were as follow: denaturation at 94 ℃ for 5 min, followed by 31 cycles of denaturation at 94 ℃ for 30 s, annealing at 52 ℃ for 22 s, extension at 72 ℃ for 40 s and final extension at 72 ℃ for 5 min. These conditions were established using the thermo cycler (Eppendorf, Germany). Electrophoresis of PCR products was performed in 3% agarose gel for 100 min in Tris-acetate buffer and visualized by ethidium bromide staining, then illuminated by UV-trans illuminator and logged by a gel documentation apparatus (UVP Gel Seq Software, England). A 50 bp plus DNA ladder (fermentas) was used as a size reference.

2.7. Compute the number of tandem repeats

The following formula was used to compute the number of tandem repeats (TRS):

Where PPS refers to PCR product size; SLFR means the size of the left flank region; SRFR is the size of the right flank region.

The flanking regions size previously described[13,14]. Also,to calculate the molecular weight of PCR product from the images gained on the gel, gene tools software (Version 3.08) were used (Figure 1). After analysis and obtaining the molecular weight of PCR products, the number of TRS was calculated using the formula described above (Table 2) and isolates was typed. This means that strains that have 80% similarity or more were placed at one type and other strains placed on the other types.

Table 1Characteristics of selected TR loci for MLVA sub-typing of L. monocytogenes.

Table 2Types number, sources and the number of tandem repeats per lux of L. monocytogenes isolates.

2.8. Drawing of phylogenic tree

For this purpose, the number of tandem repeat of each locus converted to the corresponding sequences of isolates and the evolutionary tree of strains was drawn by MEGA software (Version 6.06).

3. Result

3.1. Bacterial isolation

In this study, 170 clinical samples were collected during the three years (2010-2013). Clinical specimen obtained from patients with spontaneous abortions hospitalized in Shariati hospital, including: placenta tissue, blood, urine, vaginal and fecal swabs that fourteen strains of L. monocytogenes were obtained. Maximum and minimum isolates of bacteria related to vaginal swab and blood sample with 5 and 0 isolates, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3Resources, the number and percentage of samples examined in this study.

3.2. Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The RT5 response of L. monocytogenes to 6 the various antimicrobial agents in this study is presented in Table 4. High resistance (57.14) to penicillin was found among isolates. Antibiotic resistance not found for ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, trimethoprim, and ampicillin.

Table 4Susceptibility of L. monocytogenes isolates to 8 antimicrobial agents.

No: Number of isolates; R: Resistant; I: Intermediate resistance; S: Susceptible.

Figure 1. Photograph by gene tools software (Version 3.08) environment for calculation of the size of PCR product.

3.3. Invasion index determination

The Results of invasion index are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Invasion index of L. monocytogenes strains.

3.4. MLVA typing

By using of MLVA technique, fourteen strains studied were located in seven different types that type 2, 3 and 4 strains were consist the most types (Table 2)Evolutionary relationships tree of strains presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Dendrogram of the MLVA results for the L. monocytogenes isolates. The dendrogram is constructed by MEGA 6.06 software.

4. Discussion

The incidence of listeriosis in pregnancy is 12 per 100 000, compared with a rate of 0.7 per 100 000 in the common people[19]. Almost one-third of reported human listeriosis cases is reported during prenatal period, which can result in spontaneous abortion (CDC, 2005). Reports of listeriosis from humans in Iran are unclear, either because of losing on recognizing the isolate, unsuitable isolation techniques or absence of awareness. In the present study, of 170 samples collected from women with spontaneous abortions, 14 isolates were identified as L. monocytogenes. Contamination rate of samples in women with spontaneous abortion was 4 (7.5), 0 (0), 2 (5.7), 5 (14/2) and 3 (8.5) for placental, blood, urine, vaginal and rectal swab, respectively. Diverse incidence rates of L. monocytogenes has been described from some countries. In 2007, Kaur et al. collected 305 samples from 61 patients with spontaneous abortions that four isolates were identified as L. monocytogenes[20]. In the same year (2007) in Belgrade, one L. monocytogenes isolate was separated from 958 clinical samples[21]. In a report in 2013, Soni et al., isolated five (1.7%) L. monocytogenes out of the 300 clinical samples[22]. The variance reported among the studies can be due to variances in the population under study include culture, race, nutrition, ecological region and also laboratorial diagnosis methods. Since listeriosis is rare, there are no prospective in vivo studies on antibiotic regimens and routinely for treatment of patients penicillin plus an aminoglycoside is used. Nevertheless, reports of resistant isolates of L. monocytogenes in recent years have caused concern[6,8,22-24]. In the present study, L. monocytogenes was highly sensitive to ampicillin (100%) and trimethoprim (100%), sensitive to ciprofloxacin (78.57%), tetracycline (64.28%), streptomycin (85.71%) and norfloxacin (64.28%) but resistant to penicillin G (57.14%).Sensitivity of totally strains to ampicillin, similarly seen in the study of Barbosa and colleague. In their study resistances to nitrofurantoin (n=99), tetracycline (n=2), erythromycin (n=10), gentamicin (n=1) ciprofloxacin (n=18), and rifampicin (n=1) also were observed[25]. In confirmation with our study about resistance to penicillin, Prazak et al. reported one isolate of L. monocytogenes that was sensitive to all antibacterial agents except penicillin[26]. In our study there were strains that were resistant to two or even three antibiotics and two drug-resistant strains have been observed that provide evidence of emergence of multiresistant L. monocytogenes strains, pointing to an increase in the potential menace to human health that poses to this pathogen. In addition, in 2010 a study was conducted on clinical samples in France. The emergence of resistance to tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones was observed but not reported any case of resistance to penicillin[8]. Penicillin resistance in our present is lack of resistance to these antibiotics in the above studies, probably due to differences in drug use patterns among the two countries and the indiscriminate use of antibiotics, and also there is sometimes using of antibiotic without a doctor’s recommendation in our country. The invasion index was in the range of 0.001-0.007. Strains 8 and 9 have the invasion index over 0.005, Invasion index of these strains were between 0.006 and 0.007, respectively. These strains were obtained from placental tissue. In study of counter in 2006, the invasion and intracellular growth of 18 strains of L. monocytogenes were valued. Index invasive strains were mostly between 0.001-0.007. Only one strain isolated from salmon has a high invasion index (between 0.001-0.7) and was concord with the results of the existent study[27]. In study of Roche et al., on strains with low pathogenicity (low virulence), isolates were investigated complete phenotypically and genotypically to be able to cause little aggressive. In this study, invasion index in strains with low virulence was fewer than one-thousandth[28]. After recognizing strains, typing is very essential. This study is the first report of typing of L. monocytogenes by the MLVA technique in Iran. In this study, five loci (LM10, LM11, LM32, LM23, LM-TR6) used for MLVA-typing. This technique successfully discriminated each of isolates and 7 different types obtained that type 2 and 3 with 4 strains were the most abundant types. Murphy et al., in 2006, for the first time were able to differentiate forty-five foodborne L. monocytogenes strains using the MLVA. They used the six loci and MLVA successfully discriminated among the isolates[13]. Discriminatory power loci used in this study were consistent with the results of the present study. In 2008 Lindstedt et al. studied 79 strains of L. monocytogenes isolates from Sweden and these isolates were divided in 28 MLVA Profile, successfully[29]. In another study, Chen et al. isolated 46 strains of L. monocytogenes from food samples and were typing by the MLVA, with results of the present study corresponded[30]. In this study further strains isolated from the vagina and the placenta were in a similar type[3,4]. It is interesting that the strains isolated from the vagina and the placenta of the same type were also more resistant to penicillin. This findings show that the source of infection could be same and strains that are available to the vagina can also invade the placenta and have high resistance to penicillin and thus can cause abortion. These results highlight the role of L. monocytogenes in abortion. Also, results of the antimicrobial resistance of isolates are indicative of emergence of multiresistant L. monocytogenes strains, that pointing to an increase in the potential menace to human health posed to this pathogen. Hence, antibiotic susceptibility testing for on time and precise treatment especially in pregnant women are crucial. Given the importance of finding potential sources of contamination, particularly in epidemics, using a rapid and cheap technique with high contrast resolution is essential. MLVA technique is proper for these purposes, and due to its simplicity, it is recommended. It also recommended further studies onto larger samples from variety of sources such as food and animal specimens to be compare using MLVA.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments:

The authors are indebted to staff and members of the department of Medical Microbiology of Iran University of medical sciences for cooperation.

References

[1] Weis J, Seeliger HPR. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl Microbiol 1975; 30(1): 29-32.

[2] Moshtaghi H, Garg SR, Mandokhot UV. Prevalence of Listeria in soil. Indian J Exp Biol 2003; 41(12): 1466-1468.

[3] Sauders BD, Durak MZ, Fortes E, Windham K, Schukken Y, Lembo AJ Jr, et al. Molecular characterization of Listeria monocytogenes from natural and urban environments. J Food Prot 2006; 69(1): 93-105.

[4] Sauders BD, Overdevest J, Fortes E, Windham K, Schukken Y, Lembo A, et al. Diversity of Listeria species in urban and natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78(12): 4420-4433.

[5] Lecuit M. Understanding how Listeria monocytogenes targets and crosses host barriers. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005; 11(6): 430-436.

[6] Lotfollahil L, Nowrouzi J, Irajian G, Masjedian F, Kazemi B, Eslamian L, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Listeria monocytogenes in spontaneous abortions inhumans. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011; 5(14): 1990-1993.

[7] Barton Behravesh C, Jones TF, Vugia DJ, Long C, Marcus R, Smith K, et al. Deaths associated with bacterial pathogens transmitted commonly through food: foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet), 1996-2005. J Infect Dis 2011; 204(2): 263-267.

[8] Morvan A, Moubareck C, Leclercq A, Hervé-Bazin M, Bremont S, Lecuit S, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from humans in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54(6): 2728-3271.

[9] Vela AI, Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Latre MV, Rodríguez AA, Domínguez L, Moreno MA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from meningoencephalitis in sheep. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001; 17(3): 215-220.

[10] Liu D, Lawrence ML, Austin FW, Ainsworth AJ. A multiplex PCR for species- and virulence-specific determination of Listeria monocytogenes. J Microbiol Methods 2007; 71(2): 133-140.

[11] Miya S, Kimura B, Sato M, Takahashi H, Ishikawa T, Suda T. Development of a multilocus variable-number of tandem repeat typing method for Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b strains. Int J Food Microbiol 2008; 124(3): 239-249.

[12] Fugett EB, Schoonmaker-Bopp D, Dumas NB, Corby J, Wiedmann M. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of temporally matched Listeria monocytogenes isolates from human clinical cases, foods, ruminant farms, and urban and natural environments reveals source-associated as well as widely distributed PFGE types. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45(3): 865-873.

[13] Murphy M, Corcoran D, Buckley JF, O’Mahony M, Whyte P, Fanning S. Development and application of Multiple-Locus Variable number of tandem repeat Analysis (MLVA) to subtype a collection of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 115(2):187-194.

[14] Sperry KEV, Kathariou S, Edwards JS, Wolf LA. Multiplelocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis as a tool for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes strains. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46(4): 1435-1450.

[15] Saleh-Lakha S, Allen VG, Li J, Pagotto F, Odumeru J, Taboada E, et al. Subtyping of a large collection of historical Listeria monocytogenes strains from Ontario, Canada, by an improved multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79(20): 6472-6480.

[16] Lunestad BT, Truong TT, Lindstedt BA. A multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from Norwegian salmon-processing factories and from listeriosis patients. Epidemiol Infect 2013; 141(10): 2101-2110.

[17] Ebersbach T, J?rgensen JB, Heegaard PM, Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC, Poulsen M, et al. Certain dietary carbohydrates promote Listeria infection in a guinea pig model, while others prevent it. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 140(2-3): 218-224.

[18] Li X, Huang B, Eglezos S, Graham T, Blair B, Bates J. Identification of an optimized panel of variable number tandem-repeat (VNTR) loci for Listeria monocytogenes typing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 75(2): 203-206.

[19] Janakiraman V. Listeriosis in pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008; 1(4):179-185.

[20] Kaur S, Malik SV, Vaidya VM, Barbuddhe SB. Listeria monocytogenes in spontaneous abortions in humans and its detection by multiplex PCR. J Appl Microbiol 2007; 103(5): 1889-1896.

[21] Stepanovi? S, Vukovi? D, Djuki? S, Cirkovi? I, Svabi?-Vlahovi? M. Long-term analysis of Listeria monocytogenes vaginal carriage frequency in Belgrade, Serbia (short communication). Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2007; 54(2): 195-199.

[22] Soni DK, Singh RK, Singh DV, Dubey SK. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from Ganges water, human clinical and milk samples at Varanasi, India. Infect Genet Evol 2013; 14: 83-91.

[23] Chenal-Francisque V, Charlier C, Mehvish S, Dieye H, Leclercq A, Courvalin P, et al. Highly rifampicin-resistant Listeria monocytogenes isolated from a patient with prosthetic bone infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 1829-1830..

[24] Nwachukwu NC, Orji FA, Iheukwumere I, Ekeleme UG. Antibiotic resistant environmental isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from anthropogenic lakes in Lokpa-Ukwu, Abia State of Nigeria. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2010; 4(7): 1571-1576.

[25] Barbosa J, Magalh?es R, Santos I, Ferreira V, Brand?o TR, Silva J, et al. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance patterns of food and clinical Listeria monocytogenes isolates in Portugal. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2013; 10(10): 861-866.

[26] Prazak MA, Murano EA, Mercado I, Acuff GR. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from various cabbage farms and packing sheds in Texas. J Food Prot 2002; 65(11): 1796-1799.

[27] Conter M, Di Ciccio P, D’Orio V, Vergara A, Zanardi E, Ghidini S, et al. Preliminary notes on invasion and proliferation of foodborne Listeria monocytogenes strains. Vol. XVI. Annali della Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria; 2006, p. 175-182.

[28] Roche SM, Gracieux P, Milohanic E, Albert I, Virlogeux-Payant I, Témoin S, et al. Investigation of specific substitutions in virulence genes characterizing phenotypic groups of lowvirulence field strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71(10): 6039-6048.

[29] Lindstedt BA, Tham W, Danielsson-Tham ML, Vardund T, Helmersson S, Kapperud G. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis of Listeria monocytogenes using multicolour capillary electrophoresis and comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. J Microbiol Methods 2008; 72(2): 141-148.

[30] Chen S, Li J, Saleh-Lakha S, Allen V, Odumeru J. Multiplelocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) of Listeria monocytogenes directly in food samples. Int J Food Microbiol 2011; 148(1): 8-14.

doi:Document heading

*Corresponding authors: Gholamreza Irajian, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲伊人久久精品影院| 91精品专区国产盗摄| 国产第一页亚洲| 国产精品高清国产三级囯产AV| 亚洲国产精品成人久久综合影院| 欧美一级黄片一区2区| 国产精品99一区不卡| 欧洲亚洲一区| 亚洲日韩高清在线亚洲专区| 国产精品污污在线观看网站| 亚洲狼网站狼狼鲁亚洲下载| 成年人久久黄色网站| 日韩精品一区二区深田咏美| 日本高清在线看免费观看| 中文字幕无码制服中字| 精品亚洲国产成人AV| 成人国产一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女偷拍| 国产午夜不卡| 国产精品人莉莉成在线播放| 日韩无码白| 九色91在线视频| 视频二区欧美| 国产呦精品一区二区三区网站| 美女国内精品自产拍在线播放| 国产色偷丝袜婷婷无码麻豆制服| 亚洲天堂在线视频| 激情无码视频在线看| 青青国产视频| 色视频久久| 亚洲黄色片免费看| 三级国产在线观看| 毛片手机在线看| 亚洲欧美国产五月天综合| 久久婷婷五月综合97色| 国产欧美日韩91| 国产欧美日韩精品第二区| 国产粉嫩粉嫩的18在线播放91 | 2020久久国产综合精品swag| 国产在线视频导航| 欧美色视频在线| 99九九成人免费视频精品 | 性喷潮久久久久久久久| 精品人妻无码中字系列| 中文国产成人精品久久一| 国产91蝌蚪窝| AV色爱天堂网| 欧美黄网在线| 秘书高跟黑色丝袜国产91在线| 精品无码国产自产野外拍在线| 无遮挡国产高潮视频免费观看| 在线一级毛片| 婷婷开心中文字幕| 亚洲综合久久一本伊一区| 在线看免费无码av天堂的| 在线a网站| 人妻出轨无码中文一区二区| 日本免费一级视频| 亚洲成A人V欧美综合天堂| 在线另类稀缺国产呦| 国产乱论视频| 一级一级一片免费| 99国产精品免费观看视频| 亚洲毛片在线看| 蝌蚪国产精品视频第一页| 精品亚洲欧美中文字幕在线看| 欧美精品在线观看视频| 欧美一区二区自偷自拍视频| 丰满的熟女一区二区三区l| 国产sm重味一区二区三区| 小13箩利洗澡无码视频免费网站| 欧美中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品冒白浆免费视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放傲雪网 | 国产真实乱了在线播放| 国产青榴视频| 国产亚洲精久久久久久久91| 亚洲成人在线网| 丰满少妇αⅴ无码区| 久久综合成人| 亚洲第一香蕉视频| 国产在线观看91精品亚瑟|