李志剛
磐石市明城鎮(zhèn)衛(wèi)生院,吉林 磐石 132300
傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)和微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療小兒疝氣療效對(duì)比研究
李志剛
磐石市明城鎮(zhèn)衛(wèi)生院,吉林 磐石 132300
目的探討微創(chuàng)手術(shù)和傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)治療小兒疝氣臨床效果。方法對(duì)來(lái)我院診治的90例患兒入院資料進(jìn)行分析,將其隨機(jī)分為兩組。對(duì)照組采用傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)治療,實(shí)驗(yàn)組采用微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療,比較兩組治療效果。結(jié)果實(shí)驗(yàn)組93.3%治療效果理想,高于對(duì)照組(80%)(P<0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組93.3%對(duì)我院治療總體滿意,高于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)時(shí)間為(11.37±2.63)min、術(shù)中出血量為(4.62±0.39)ml,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥為17.8%(8/45),低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。結(jié)論小兒疝氣發(fā)病率較高,采用微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療效果理想,值得推廣使用。
微創(chuàng)手術(shù);傳統(tǒng)手術(shù);小兒疝氣;臨床效果
小兒疝氣是臨床上常見的疾病,這種疾病在小兒腹股溝區(qū)發(fā)病率較高,患兒發(fā)病后臨床上主要表現(xiàn)為:腫塊等,給患兒帶來(lái)很大痛苦。近年來(lái),微創(chuàng)手術(shù)在臨床上使用較多,并且取得理想效果[1]。為了探討微創(chuàng)手術(shù)和傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)治療小兒疝氣臨床效果。對(duì)2013年4月至2014年 4月來(lái)我院診治的90例患兒入院資料進(jìn)行分析,分析報(bào)告如下。
1.1 一般資料
對(duì)來(lái)我院診治的90例患兒病歷資料等進(jìn)行分析,將其隨機(jī)分為兩組。實(shí)驗(yàn)中,男47例,女43例,患兒年齡為6個(gè)月~10歲,平均年齡為(3.3±1.2)歲。患兒中,78例單側(cè)疝氣,12例雙側(cè)疝氣,兩組對(duì)其治療方案等均完全知情權(quán),兩組患兒年齡、病情等差異不顯著(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
對(duì)照組采用傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)治療,具體方法如下:采取平行腹股溝韌帶斜切口,斜切口范圍3~5 cm,其他手術(shù)操作等和實(shí)驗(yàn)組相同。實(shí)驗(yàn)組采用微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療,具體方法如下:手術(shù)前對(duì)患兒進(jìn)行麻醉,并讓其保持仰臥姿勢(shì),將兩腿分開并微固定。在患兒側(cè)恥骨結(jié)節(jié)外側(cè)做一個(gè)長(zhǎng)為0.8~1.0 cm的切口,切口方向?yàn)闄M向方向,然后將患兒疝囊完全切除達(dá)其頸部,并對(duì)患兒機(jī)體采取高位結(jié)扎,手術(shù)后對(duì)患兒進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的抗感染等處理。
1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理方法
實(shí)驗(yàn)中,對(duì)患兒治療時(shí)的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行搜集,利用SPSS 16軟件進(jìn)行分析,并進(jìn)行χ2檢驗(yàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果采用(x-±s)表示。
本次研究中,實(shí)驗(yàn)組93.3%(42/45)治療效果理想,高于對(duì)照組80%(36/45),(P<0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組93.3%(42/45)對(duì)我院療效總體滿意,高于對(duì)照組77.8%(35/45),P<0.05。實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)時(shí)間為(11.37±2.63)min、術(shù)中出血量為(4.62±0.39)ml,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患兒無(wú)需住院,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率為17.8%(8/45),低于對(duì)照組手術(shù)時(shí)間為(19.75±3.56)min、術(shù)中出血量為(7.85±0.27)ml,住院時(shí)間為(4.98±1.8)d,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥為31.1%(14/45)。
小兒疝氣是臨床上發(fā)病率相對(duì)較低的先天性畸形,其發(fā)病率在0.8%~4.4%左右,患兒發(fā)病后主要以腫塊為首發(fā)癥狀。傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)雖然能夠改善患兒癥狀,但是效果不理想。近年來(lái),微創(chuàng)手術(shù)在小兒疝氣中使用較多,并取得理想效果。這種手術(shù)和傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)較多,手術(shù)過(guò)程中醫(yī)護(hù)人員能夠有效的避免疝囊對(duì)傷口的碰撞,能夠有效的降低感染等發(fā)生率。此外,患兒在腹腔鏡下手術(shù)能夠保證醫(yī)護(hù)人員足夠的手術(shù)視野,即便對(duì)于疝囊周圍出現(xiàn)大量膿液患兒也能夠有效清洗,避免手術(shù)腸間積膿。此外,對(duì)于病情未確診的患兒通過(guò)微創(chuàng)手術(shù)能夠幫助患兒進(jìn)一步探測(cè),幫助患兒確診,并且確診后能夠立即進(jìn)行手術(shù),避免了剖腹探測(cè)[2]。
綜上所述,小兒疝氣發(fā)病率較高,臨床上采用微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療效果理想,能夠提高臨床治愈率,值得推廣使用。
[1]陸曉生,彭昊,凌尚準(zhǔn),等.顯微鏡下手術(shù)治療單節(jié)段腰椎間盤突出癥的前瞻性研究[J].中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志,2009,23(8):909-912.
[2]劉衍民,李宇洲,李成昌.微型腹腔鏡小兒疝高位結(jié)扎術(shù)及臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].中國(guó)現(xiàn)代手術(shù)學(xué)雜志,2000,4(4):251-252.
A Comparative Study of Traditional Operation and Minimally Invasive Operation in Treatment of Children Colic Efficacy
LI Zhigang Ming town health center in Panshi,Panshi Jilin 132300,China
ObjectiveTo explore the minimally invasive operation and traditionaloperation in treatment of the clinical effect of pediatric hernia.Methods90 cases of patients admitted to our hospital were analyzed,and were randomly divided into two groups. The control group used the traditionaloperation treatment,the experimental group with minimally invasive operationtreatment,treatment effects were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe ideal effect in treatment of experimental group was 93.3%,higher than that of the control group(80%)(P<0.05); the experimental group of 93.3% in our hospital for the overall satisfaction,higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The experimental group operation time was (11.37±2.63) min,the amount of intraoperative bleeding was (4.62 ± 0.39)ml,postoperative complications was 17.8% (8/45),lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).ConclusionThe high incidence of pediatric hernia, ideal treatment effect of minimally invasive operation in clinical use,is worthy to be popularized.
Minimally invasive operation,Traditional operation,Children colic,Clinical effect
R726.5
B
1674-9316(2014)23-0127-02
10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-9316.2014.23.074